• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AE911Truth.org to Ryan Mackey: "Debate our Rocket Scientist"

R.Mackey said:
I don't think it has any particular significance. You will note that I have never argued on the basis of my authority. Only reason it ever came up is because people asked me what I did for a living, and how I came to understand the basics of science. But I can imagine literally hundreds of professions that would provide an equally useful grounding.
Click to expand...

I know that....I have been very impressed with your arguments so far and I have looked for errors in your math/physics and have found none.

You do a good job of not "arguing from authority" so my comment wasn't anything personal at you...it was more of a curiousity....

I work/have worked with many types of engineers and scientists, including "rocket scientists" so I dont have anything against the aero guys.

R.Mackey said:
However, in this case, it's obviously meant to respond to me personally. Which tells you just how misguided, and how petty, AE911T is.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah definately....them saying "debate OUR rocket scientist" is obviously a childish challenge to you personally.
 
R.Mackey said:
But I can imagine literally hundreds of professions that would provide an equally useful grounding.
Click to expand...

Sadly enough, people like me who's profession comes nowhere close to any sort of structural or mechanical engineering apparently know and understand enough to see how truthers are wrong.

It is truly a sad state of affairs. I am having to go through and try to explain to an electrical engineering student on ATS how NIST could not have simply run their model tens of thousands of times to account for all the variations in input and investigations are not done by ignoring the recorded evidence until you have entirely finished your simulations.

I watched your recent debate by the way Ryan and I think I have lost the stomach for such things. A good performance nonetheless.
 
newton3376 said:
Not to drail the thread but.....

Why is it that "rocket science" has this prestige about it as if it is more difficult than other areas of science?
Click to expand...

It is just easier to appreciate the skill of an engineer who can send an object millions of miles to hit a target that he cannot even see, rather like hitting a hole-in-one on a golf course a hundred miles from the tee.

ETA: This is, of course, about as easy for a real scientist as it is for Gage and Griffin to locate their gluteals with both hands and a mirror.
 
Last edited:
bio said:
I have the impression, that we live in parallels-worlds. I saw no "refuting" in Roberts tergiversations.
Click to expand...

I would have to agree! I live in the real world, you and the rest of the truth movement live in a fantasy world.

Try watching the debate again, then post the points Gage got correct.
 
leftysergeant said:
It is just easier to appreciate the skill of an engineer who can send an object millions of miles to hit a target that he cannot even see, rather like hitting a hole-in-one on a golf course a hundred miles from the tee.
Click to expand...

I guess I can see the point you are making there...

leftysergeant said:
ETA: This is, of course, about as easy for a real scientist as it is for Gage and Griffin to locate their gluteals with both hands and a mirror.
Click to expand...

ROFL
 
Brain scientist;
hmmm a functional MRI of a CTist?..................

perhaps a long session on the couch talking over their relationship with their fathers?.............

Nah, I like rocket surgeon better, has more CT cache.
 
stroke.jpg
 
leftysergeant said:
It is just easier to appreciate the skill of an engineer who can send an object millions of miles to hit a target that he cannot even see, rather like hitting a hole-in-one on a golf course a hundred miles from the tee.

ETA: This is, of course, about as easy for a real scientist as it is for Gage and Griffin to locate their gluteals with both hands and a mirror.
Click to expand...

Don't forget the part about having the ball swoosh into the hole and then get itself back to the tee. lol
 
Ryan,

"Our rocket scientist" was sarcasm. You are referred to as a "NASA scientist"

What is your degree in?
What did you do at NASA that qualifies you to analyze what caused the collapse of WTC 1, 2, and 7?

Or are you just a concerned citizen?
 
Christopher7 said:
Ryan,

"Our rocket scientist" was sarcasm. You are referred to as a "NASA scientist"

What is your degree in?
What did you do at NASA that qualifies you to analyze what caused the collapse of WTC 1, 2, and 7?

Or are you just a concerned citizen?
Click to expand...


If you believe RM's analyses are wrong you should be able to point where, how and why he is wrong.

You can't. Firstly, because RM usually has got it right. Secondly, because, even if RM where wrong on some issue you lack the knowledge and skill to point out his error.

That's the reason you have to resort to this Ad Hominem.
 
NutCracker said:
If you believe RM's analyses are wrong you should be able to point where, how and why he is wrong.

You can't. Firstly, because RM usually has got it right. Secondly, because, even if RM where wrong on some issue you lack the knowledge and skill to point out his error.

That's the reason you have to resort to this Ad Hominem.
Click to expand...
Ad Hominem? :D:D:D:D:D

I asked a civil question. What are Ryan's qualifications?
 
bio said:
I have the impression, that we live in parallels-worlds. I saw no "refuting" in Roberts tergiversations.
Click to expand...

srsly?

Can you explain the discussion of R. J. Lee's paper which discusses the iron rich spheres? I mean, Gage was embarrassingly wrong. I never flatly claim something like this but for him to say that the paper was talking about how they had no idea what those spheres were obviously shows that he did not read the paper. Essentially he was just pulling an answer out of his ass.

OMG I cannot believe you said this bio, Mark Roberts pointed out sooo many things. I really would like you to respond to this post, please.

OT this seems childish of the AE911T, ok it plainly is childish. Besides, I can take on ANY of them and I'm a freaking anthropology undergrad!
 
Christopher7 said:
Ad Hominem? :D:D:D:D:D

I asked a civil question. What are Ryan's qualifications?
Click to expand...


You fail to target RM's arguments, you target his credentials in the hope of discrediting him.

That's an Ad Hominem.

Boy, 5 grins.. 5! One really has to explain the most basic of matters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom