• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

A new investigation for 9/11. Why?

Oh my...

The second question, what time did Bush become aware of the attacks.

I am curious why they wish to no this for starters (though I know why certain paranoid people want to know), WHY is it relevant?

Secondly, didn't bush become aware that it was a TERRORIST attack when Andy Card leaned into him and told him of the second plane.

So how was it not adequately answered.

Thirdly, For those paranoids who think Bush is hiding either (A) orchestration of, or (B) purposely allowing the attacks, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK HE WILL TELL THE TRUTH UNDER OATH???

TAM:)
 
Thirdly, For those paranoids who think Bush is hiding either (A) orchestration of, or (B) purposely allowing the attacks, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK HE WILL TELL THE TRUTH UNDER OATH???
Cause the oath is under their super duper telepathic mind control of Xavier as he leads the Teenage Mutants on their quest for the holy grail.
 
Cause the oath is under their super duper telepathic mind control of Xavier as he leads the Teenage Mutants on their quest for the holy grail.

Well all comedy aside, the question goes to the point that the vast majority of these victim family members almost certainly are neither LIHOP or MIHOP. If you presume the president and his minions are evil enough for either of the LIHOP/MIHOP scenarious, then you have to presume that they are evil enough to lie, oath bedamned, so what good is having them under oath???

TAM:)
 
Well all comedy aside, the question goes to the point that the vast majority of these victim family members almost certainly are neither LIHOP or MIHOP. If you presume the president and his minions are evil enough for either of the LIHOP/MIHOP scenarious, then you have to presume that they are evil enough to lie, oath bedamned, so what good is having them under oath???

TAM:)
Why would there be a second investigation that would be nothing more than a colossal waste of time and money? I mean seriously TAM, if I were to shoot someone in full view of thousands of eyewitnesses, what good would an investigation be into my guilt or innocence? If you want to entertain the ignorant delusions of the severely mentally challenged TM go right ahead.
 
I agree. A second investigation is a waste of time, unless it is very specific and very focused. If it could be reasoned that following up on the money trail and international backing of the hijackers would be worth while, then I would be ok with such a focused investigation. The rest of it, I think, is as you have said, a complete waste of time and money.

TAM:)
 
I agree. A second investigation is a waste of time, unless it is very specific and very focused. If it could be reasoned that following up on the money trail and international backing of the hijackers would be worth while, then I would be ok with such a focused investigation. The rest of it, I think, is as you have said, a complete waste of time and money.

TAM:)
TAM, if I shot someone in full view of thousands of witnesses what good is an investigation into who gave me the money to buy the gun going to do? Is it going to change my guilt? Another red herring of the mentally challenged TM is exactly what this is. Follow it at your own peril.
 
It says private funding. From where? How do people know that you aren't just making things up (Like the twoof movement does) just to get people to sign?
If they can raise 10 million a year through the petition they can also do it now. They haven't. Please stop entertaining the delusions of the mentally incompetent.
 
It says private funding. From where? How do people know that you aren't just making things up (Like the twoof movement does) just to get people to sign?


I would suggest actually reading the petition, instead of speculating based on what I've said previously.
 
Exactly! They want an investigation, let them pay for it.
However, I get the impression they want the government to pay for it...using our tax dollars, of course.

And they want the magic "supena power" that makes everyone tell the truth.
 
And they want the magic "supena power" that makes everyone tell the truth.

I think the going is this: when there is a new investigation the powers that be will be so afraid of the truthers, after all they made their foundations tremble, that they dare not do anything but tell the truth. Then the truthers will get the princess and half of the country and they will rule, adored by everybody.
 
From the list of luminaries heading up that commission it's a wonder they didn't ask Ronald McDonald to preside.
 
deep your ANSWER to this was not an answer at all; Please explain how the people below are anywhere near qualified to conduct a "new" investigation:


William pepper - not an engineer, not a person that has extensive knowledge about terrorist ogranizations, not a politician who handles foreign affairs. Dont see how he is qualified

Lorie Van Auken - what is her expertise in teh above other than being a wife of a victim on 9/11?

Edgar Mitchel - what expertise in the above does a ex astronaut have?

Ed Asner - what does an actor have to do with all things 9/11?

Gumbleton =- why a relgious leader?

and two senators ? why would you have those who work for the govt on your new "investigation" team?
 
deep your ANSWER to this was not an answer at all; Please explain how the people below are anywhere near qualified to conduct a "new" investigation:


What qualifications would you expect?

They're going to vote to determine who else gets added to the commission (with an upper limit on the number of members). They will also bring in subject-matter experts wherever appropriate.
 
What qualifications would you expect?

If you have to ask this question, then you only demonstrate how CLUELESS the entire 9/11 "Truth" movement is and how completely OUT OF TOUCH with reality they are.
 
I would imagine:

Investigators
Detectives
Police officers

People like that. Not victims. They are immeadiatly biased. But, you claim to have an "independant" investigation. BS
 
If you have to ask this question, then you only demonstrate how CLUELESS the entire 9/11 "Truth" movement is and how completely OUT OF TOUCH with reality they are.


If that's the case, then I guess very few people will vote in favor of it. It's not like this is being forced on anybody.

The 52,000 people who signed the petition already seem to like their choices.
 
Ok, wait, earlier it was 67,000. So which is it????

Even 52,000 is ONLY .65% of NEW YORK CITY wants a NEW investigation. Sad really!!

PS, My math was completely wrong yesterday.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom