A Challenge for Oliver: This is America

[Giggywig]

I also asked Bush why war and why there are so many Bush-lite in U.S..

Never got a good answer...

Good for you. I don't see how this is relevant. It seems to me you are trying to derail the conversation. It's ok, if you know you are wrong you don't have to say anything else. Or you can start talking about something unrelated.

 

[Ziggurat]

He calls himself a Jew, so I call him a Jew.

Time travel: Ion's new excuse for his antisemitism. Well, at least it's got chutzpah.

Watch, Ion will now take my use of the word "chutzpah" as evidence that I'm Jewish.

 

[Ion]

Good for you. I don't see how this is relevant...

Me I see.

You are a Bush-lite.

 

[Ion]

Time travel: Ion's new excuse for his antisemitism. Well, at least it's got chutzpah.

Watch, Ion will now take my use of the word "chutzpah" as evidence that I'm Jewish.

Well you say so in that Jew gold quote.

And you play to the gallery too.

 

[Giggywig]

Me I see.

You are a Bush-lite.

I see you decided to go for option B) talking about something unrelated. In this case some sort of adhom. Good, that's settled then. you admit you were wrong. Thanks for playing.

 

[Ziggurat]

Well you say so in that Jew gold quote.

No, I said I had Jew gold. I could have stolen it off a Jew myself, doesn't necessarily mean I'm a Jew. Not to mention, that quote comes after you called me a Jew. God, you're a tool. A desparate, pathetic, mewling little tool.

 

[Ion]

I see you decided to go for option B) talking about something unrelated...

"...something unrelated..." my foot, Giggy.

The thread is about A Challenge for Oliver: This is America and my reply to This is America applies to you as you being like millions of Americans a Bush-lite.

 

[Ion]

No, I said I had Jew gold. I could have stolen it off a Jew myself, doesn't necessarily mean I'm a Jew...

And Bush said that Iraq was getting uranium from Nigeria just in jeer.
And Bush commuted Libby's sentence for obstruction of justice, just in jeer.

And you spoke of stealing Jew gold, just in jeer.

You are playing Politicallly Correct American stereotypes -like stealing the Jew gold- to the gallery here.

 

[Ziggurat]

And Bush said that Iraq was getting uranium from Nigeria just in jeer.

Wrong on three counts. First off, Bush said Iraq sought uranium, not that it had obtained it. Secondly, he said Africa, he didn't specify Nigeria. And thirdly, the phrase is "in jest", not "in jeer".

You are playing Politicallly Correct American stereotypes -like stealing the Jew gold- to the gallery here.

 

[Ion]

Wrong on three counts. First off, Bush said Iraq sought uranium, not that it had obtained it. Secondly, he said Africa, he didn't specify Nigeria. And thirdly, the phrase is "in jest", not "in jeer".
...

And Mengele too said that he could seek the make of super humans, not that he had obtained it.

So by your 'logic' Bush would be scot free to use Mengele's ideas when waring for oil for his buddies.

In today's The San Diego Union Tribune Bush links one more time 9/11 and Iraq, which is a lie.

But it must have been in jest, and that's acceptable for you.

 

[Giggywig]

"...something unrelated..." my foot, Giggy.

The thread is about A Challenge for Oliver: This is America and my reply to This is America applies to you as you being like millions of Americans a Bush-lite.

One question for you: what is my stated position on Bush and Iraq? With a quote, if you don't mind.

 

[Ion]

You said that Bush succesfully appointed Wolfowitz to the World Bank.

It must have been such a success that Wolfowitz got kicked out when Bush got pressure from Europeans.

 

[Giggywig]

You said that Bush succesfully appointed Wolfowitz to the World Bank.

It must have been such a success that Wolfowitz got kicked out when Bush got pressure from Europeans.

Was Wolfowitz at the World Bank for 2 years yes or no? You see Ion, he was successfully appointed to the World bank, whether you like it or not. That the Europeans then successfully ousted him 2 years later does not rewrite history.
And that was a statement of fact, not my position on the issue, so please try again. What is my stated position on Bush or Iraq?

 

[Ion]

Being for 2 years there and criticized is not being sussessfully appointed.

Is another of Bush failures.

 

[Giggywig]

Being for 2 years there and criticized is not being sussessfully appointed.

Is another of Bush failures.

NOW it is a failure. But, whether you like it or not, he was successfully appointed. If Bush had been unsuccessful, Wolfowitz would have never even been there.

 

[Ion]

No he wasn't sussesfully appointed.

What did he accomplish in order to be kicked out promptly?

I re-iterate:

Bush has only these failures to show in two terms.

 

[Giggywig]

No he wasn't sussesfully appointed.

What did he accomplish in order to be kicked out promptly?

I re-iterate:

Bush has only these failures to show in two terms.

Why do you insist on trying to redefine words? Bush nominated Wolfowitz, he was confirmed, and he took the position. Success. Just admit you made an error and move on. You can point that his man left the World Bank under less than desirable circumstances all you want. Take the time to be accurate about your criticisms.

And before you forget... what is my stated position on Bush and Iraq?

 

[Ion]

Wolfowitz was not succesfully nominated by Bush at the World Bank.

Bush failed.

 

[Giggywig]

Wolfowitz was not succesfully nominated by Bush at the World Bank.

Bush failed.

Bush nominated Wolfowitz to the World Bank, he was confirmed, and he took up the job. Your statement is incorrect.

 

[Ion]

And how succesful were Wolfowitz and Bush at the World Bank, if Wolfowitz got the boot?

None.