9/11 Truthers - Post Your Conspiracy Theory Here

orphia nay said:
Decision time, pagan. Keep making "hit 'n' run" posts like you have been, or state your theory. I've just posted this to you (but you have the option of stating your theory here. The format of your post should remain basically the same as I have suggested):









:D Yep. I was thinking something similar.

Also, what are "supina powers"? "Court Summons to Produce Documents" with a cape and the ability to leap tall buildings with a single bound?
Click to expand...


Nope, I'm not going to start a new thread following your formula. I don't like to be railroaded. As I already have stated in a previous reply.

Subpoena. Yes, that was what I meant. You've to have a little understanding of my somewhat limited English. It is not my mothertongue.
 
pagan said:
Subpoena. Yes, that was what I meant. You've to have a little understanding of my somewhat limited English. It is not my mothertongue.
Click to expand...

You're not a native speaker of 'lucid' either, are you?
 
WildCat said:
This is a challenge to the 9/11 truthers. Since the accepted version of events on 9/11 are available in the 9/11 Commission Report and the NIST publications, I'd like to hear your version of events.
Click to expand...

Not gonna happen.

You're talking to people who think asking stupid questions is somehow the same as providing solid proof.
 
pagan said:
Nope, I'm not going to start a new thread following your formula. I don't like to be railroaded. As I already have stated in a previous reply.
Click to expand...

wow, you sure have a real misunderstanding of "railroaded"

since, we've never gotten on SOLID story (meaning, they are able to string all the 'theories' out there to make a plausible story ) of what happened on 9/11, and you seem to be the only one thus far that has at least a 12th grade education, that template is basically what we are looking for in truther claims.


How about something more simple:

I, Pagan, believe _____________ happened because of ______________. The following source : _____________________ proves what I stated above.

Why can't you truthers provide something as simple as that?
 
Arus808 said:
*snip*
How about something more simple:

I, Pagan, believe _____________ happened because of ______________. The following source : _____________________ proves what I stated above.

Why can't you truthers provide something as simple as that?
Click to expand...


The "proves"-part, Arsus - the "proves"-part... Sad, but true. :covereyes
 
Arus808 said:
How about something more simple:

I, Pagan, believe _____________ happened because of ______________. The following source : _____________________ proves what I stated above.

Why can't you truthers provide something as simple as that?
Click to expand...

Because then they'd have to actually stick to a topic, and it would be much harder to play the "I didn't say I believed that!" card.

They'd rather post a load of the same-old-same-old, and force us to devine what they do believe out of the dregs of their postings. Anything we get wrong can then be held against us.
 
pagan said:
Nope, I'm not going to start a new thread following your formula. I don't like to be railroaded. As I already have stated in a previous reply.
Click to expand...


Interpretation: I have absolutely no understanding of the technical issues under discussion, as I learnt what little I know from Loose Change and similar sites. I am concerned that if I do state a case of any sort, it will be shown as the rubbish that it is.

You've to have a little understanding of my somewhat limited English. It is not my mothertongue.
Click to expand...

There area considerable number of us here who do not have English as a first language, so I'm afraid that's not really going to cut it as an excuse other than for minor grammatical or spelling issues.
 
pagan said:
<snippage by TjW>
Subpoena. Yes, that was what I meant. You've to have a little understanding of my somewhat limited English. It is not my mothertongue.
Click to expand...

That's okay, subpoena is not a native English word.
 
CTers are downgraded these days. Most don't have a full theory, and if they do, they won't say it. Unless, in the spur of moment, some news come out, which vagely support their theory, then they'll reveal it by saying "I TOLD YOU SO, SEE?".
That's the same as me :D (though I don't really have anything yet)
 
Bumping so truthers can post the results of 5 years of hard research... surely you have something by now?
 
Quod erat demonstrandum, baby!

On the boxcutter thing: even if the "boxcutter" story were lame, why would the perps make up a lame cover story?

Since they were conceiving and executing the entire plot, the perps could just as easily have given the hijackers Uzis--or said they had Uzis. The whole "boxcutter" flap proves there was no conspiracy. Quod erat demonstrandum, baby!
 
I've also heard it called a "bale" cutter by farmers, since they cut the thick plastic straps (or older twine straps) that hold bales of hay/straw together. If someone hands you a big knife and calls it a "bale cutter", I doubt you'll be stumped as to what to do with it.
 
pagan said:
I wish I could do that. But, we simply don't know what happened that day. Well, we are sure about at least one thing and that is that the Gov't version, the official conspiracy theory. The one about 19 Mulim cokeheads equipped with boxcutters is false. There is simply no evidence for it.

The only way to find out is to have a new investigation as independent as possible, I would love to see representatives from the 911 truth movement and from the victim families in the commission.
Supina powers and total access to all archives would also be needed.
Click to expand...

from the November & December 2001 issues of Scientific American
<snip>
8. Is the claimant providing an explanation for the observed phenomena or merely
denying the existing explanation?
This is a classic debate strategy--criticize your opponent and never affirm what you believe to avoid criticism. It is next to impossible to get creationists to offer an explanation for life (other than ``God did it''). Intelligent Design (ID) creationists have done no better, picking away at weaknesses in scientific explanations for difficult problems and offering in their stead. ``ID did it.'' This stratagem is unacceptable in science.

9. If the claimant proffers a new explanation, does it account for as many phenomena as
the old explanation did?
Many HIV/AIDS skeptics argue that lifestyle causes AIDS. Yet their alternative theory does not explain nearly as much of the data as the HIV theory does. To make their argument, they must ignore the diverse evidence in support of HIV as the causal vector in AIDS while ignoring the significant correlation between the rise in AIDS among hemophiliacs shortly after HIV was inadvertently introduced into the blood supply.
<snip>
Click to expand...
The Author: Michael Shermer is founding publisher of Skeptic magazine and author of The Borderlands of Science.

pulled from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~korista/baloney.html
 
PerryLogan said:
On the boxcutter thing: even if the "boxcutter" story were lame, why would the perps make up a lame cover story?

Since they were conceiving and executing the entire plot, the perps could just as easily have given the hijackers Uzis--or said they had Uzis. The whole "boxcutter" flap proves there was no conspiracy. Quod erat demonstrandum, baby!
Click to expand...

I guess if the terrists did have uzis, the troofers would be saying: "how the hell did they get those weapons past security, plastic knives would be 100 times easier to sneak past the metall detectors than submachine guns. Inside job!!!"

So no matter what weapons the hijackers had, they will always be "proof" of an inside job.
 
Elizabeth I said:
Supina?
Click to expand...

TjW said:
Well, you see, there are those CTs who have been tokin' a bit and so are very relaxed on the couch in Mom's basement. They're supine. Then there's those CT's who are really blasted, unconscious on the floor. They're supina.

I suspect he is parroting "subpoena", but didn't understand what it was he heard.
Click to expand...

:D

I thought maybe he misunderstood and meant to say he has discovered plans by the masters of the NWO to overcome us all with the power of Supima:

What does Supima mean?
The name "Supima®" is a licensed trademark owned by Supima and its members. It is used to promote textile and apparel products made of 100% American Pima cotton, but is strictly controlled by the grower organization. The name "Supima" is an abbreviation for Superior Pima.

You see? It's obvious. They are "superior." There's a secret meeting taking place in New York THIS MONTH, where they will complete their plans for world domination:

January 23 - 25 Supima Premium Fabric Show
Gotham Hall
36th and Broadway
New York, New York

For more information on Supima Premium Fabric Show, please click on the link below:
http://www.supima.com/whatsnewdetail.cfm?Itemnumber=1434

Laugh if you want, but will it be so funny when you're choking on wads of cotton?
 
CHF said:
Not gonna happen.

You're talking to people who think asking stupid questions is somehow the same as providing solid proof.
Click to expand...

I actually made an effort making a similar thread on another forum - but I had even lower standards. I only asked everyone to give their belief on what happened - without the need to provide any proof whatsoever. One (1) truther gave his view. The rest... well why break the safe hideout behind "Im just asking questions"... (almost all "non-truthers" responded however)

Cheers,
SLOB
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom