Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[DGM]

You bring up physics. New physics is needed to understand the WTC attacks.

I don't understand why you just don't use this new physics to build a time machine and go back and see how they did it.

Just draw a few more cartoon panels. Just think of the attention you'll get.

 

[R.A.F.]

Are you personally in possession of any of the so-called plane passenger's remains?

Are you saying that there are no remains?...are you that ignorant?

 

[R.A.F.]

You bring up physics. New physics is needed to understand the WTC attacks.

Since you have no education in physics (another of your lies), then you are in NO POSITION to be telling anyone, anything.

 

[WTC Dust]

Perhaps that is because nobody has any evidence that such an office exists, whereas there are entire dossiers on those individuals who boarded the planes who were connected to terrorist groups, along with evidence that they had indeed boarded the planes involved in the events of 11 Sep. 2001.

Which is simpler: hypothetical offices or real people?

My cartoons are a representation of how I believe the terrorist acts of 9/11 were physically carried out. Specifically, I believe that individuals were controlling advanced weaponry from computer terminals. I do not believe that anybody hijacked any airplanes.

Nobody in the field of 9/11 truth is saying this except me. I drew the cartoon because most people learn better with cartoons, including myself.

Entire dossiers on dozens of individuals does not change the physics of steel buildings. You catch my drift? Even if I am 100% wrong about the hijackings, I'm not wrong about the properties of steel.

Steel is amazingly strong. Crashing a dozen semi-truck tankers full of hydrocarbon fuel into the side of the WTC would have resulted in a dented building and a bright orange, short lived fire. At the end of a few hours of fire fighting, you'd have an almost entirely intact steel cage with burn damage to the interior. If you filled up the entire WTC to the brim with hydrocarbon fuel, and set it alight, you'd end up with a steel cage. It might be warped and droopy in places where it got extra hot and stayed extra hot for a few hours, but it wouldn't be gray and dusty, and it wouldn't have exploded all over lower Manhattan.

 

[R.A.F.]

My cartoons are a representation of how I believe the terrorist acts of 9/11 were physically carried out.

Translation...I have no relevant skill set, nor relevant evidence that 911 was an "inside job", so I'll just make crap up.


There...fixed that for ya...

 

[WTC Dust]

Here's a few images of the multi-colored gray dust I'm talking about.

 

[R.A.F.]

Steel is amazingly strong.

Now you're a friggin' metallurgist?


This is just getting sad....it's not that much fun making fun of fools, particularly when they are so damn DENSE they can't tell when they are being laughed at.

 

[WTC Dust]

One year later, Ground Zero was still putting off fumes.

 

[WTC Dust]

8+ years later, the Deutsche Bank was still putting off fumes.

 

[R.A.F.]

Even if I am 100% wrong about the hijackings, I'm not wrong about the properties of steel.

I thought your posts could get any stupider....I was wrong...

 

[Orphia Nay]

Are you personally in possession of any of the so-called plane passenger's remains?

Are you personally in possession of the office and computers in your cartoons?

Your question is equally silly as mine. Likely sillier.

 

[WTC Dust]

Now you're a friggin' metallurgist?


This is just getting sad....it's not that much fun making fun of fools, particularly when they are so damn DENSE they can't tell when they are being laughed at.

I'm a chemist. Yes, I'm a biochemist, but that's still a chemist.

You might not know what biomedical science is, but it is primarily chemistry.

 

[WTC Dust]

I thought your posts could get any stupider....I was wrong...

Can you relieve my stupidity, then, and tell me why they needed smoke removal equipment in a years-long dead building (the Deutsche Bank)?

 

[WTC Dust]

Nobody's Paying Attention to the Deutsche Bank

Can anyone suggest why they needed smoke removal equipment in a years-long dead building, the Deutsche Bank?

Can anyone suggest why the smoke removal equipment failed?

P.S. I've got my own answers, I just want to see you all try and explain this. Remember, I lived next door to the Deutsche Bank and would smell whiffs of the WTC stench occasionally when I was walking the dogs.

 

[R.A.F.]

I'm a chemist. Yes, I'm a biochemist, but that's still a chemist.

Sorry, but NO...one is not synonomous with the other...

You might not know what biomedical science is...

You just assume that anyone who disagrees with you must be stupid, Huh?


You really shouldn't smoke before posting...

 

[WTC Dust]

Here's the article.

 

[R.A.F.]

Can you relieve my stupidity...

Sorry, but I don't "do" stoners...

 

[DGM]

Can you relieve my stupidity, then, and tell me why they needed smoke removal equipment in a years-long dead building (the Deutsche Bank)?

Ventilation. They were working with torches and other equipment inside the building. You do know they were disassembling the building.

 

[brazenlilraisin]

Oh I know. The "smoke" (haw haw) removal machine was really a fume neutralizer. The dismantling was really work to remove evidence of the non self-quenching effects of DEW. Ah HA! Find the receipt for the fume neutralizer and you'll have your perps.

How am I doing?

 

[dafydd]

Ventilation. They were working with torches and other equipment inside the building. You do know they were disassembling the building.

And not with tin openers.