• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

They must be in it for the money. Not.

Liars always have a motive to lie. The debunkers lie to protect Israel and the neoconservatives who instigated and profit from 9/11.

So then clearly your motive for lying is your hatred for neoconservatives and Israel, since you are the only one bringing them up. As if we didn't already know this about you.

You don't even know the definition of the word debunker. If you did you would realize that by calling others "debunkers", you are pretty much admitting that you are spewing bunk, which is BS and lies.
 
They must be in it for the money. Not.

Liars always have a motive to lie. The debunkers lie to protect Israel and the neoconservatives who instigated and profit from 9/11.
911 truth is 911 Lies. Gage makes the profit from 911, and the rest of 911 truth has no idea what happened on 911. Jesus was Jew, ironically debunkers are protecting Jesus? lol, 911 truth, 12 years of silly claims, shooting for infinity.

RADAR takes care of the no plane claims, the video and eye witnesses are extra credit. When will you attempt to refute the RADAR data? How can you, you have no knowledge how it is collected.
 
They must be in it for the money. Not.

Liars always have a motive to lie. The debunkers lie to protect Israel and the neoconservatives who instigated and profit from 9/11.

I like the way you use fancy footwork to avoid the cogent points I made upthread. Nice bob-and-weave work. It suggests to me, however, that you haven't any real answers to the questions and comments I've made.
 

Were the passengers aboard those planes a figment of someone's imagination Clayton? There's nothing fake or "doctored" about what happened to them. Every time you claim "no planes", then "no passengers" becomes your claim as well.
 
The videos were doctored.

How?

Please begin by explaining how the videos were first located in order to be doctored.

With potentially vast numbers of possible witnesses over many square miles around, both locals and tourists, any of whom had plenty of time to grab a video camera after being alerted to the first crash, how would you plan to go about finding all of the videos? For now, feel free to ignore the problem of thousands of direct eye witnesses and just concentrate on the videos problem if you like.
 
It was used as an expletive. When spoken it portrays shock or surprise or other emotion. It is always spontaneous.

Writing it was not spontaneous.


It's a person attacking Christians by pretending to be shocked.

Can we perhaps drop the feigned offense and bizarre interpretations and return to the important matter of how an energy beam turned the WTC into foam?
 
Well, what does CM want? I mean Jesus did die because he was weak and stupid.

Hey, I have an idea.

CM's pretend sensitivity was silly. Let's not give him a gratuitous chance to continue it. Let's not be honestly offensive on purpose.

Just a thought.
 
If the "NY Good Day" footage was the only clip that existed it might be noteworthy to discuss the logo placement or the drop-out glitch. But it is one of 30 clips of the same event, taken from 30 different angles and distances. The video compilation you linked upthread is nearly identical to one I've linked to you repeatedly.

Actually, the "NY Good Day" footage remains a big problem for no-planers as does all the other footage from the LIVE broadcasts. The second plane was captured live by seven different cameras from six news stations. No viable theory exists as to how fake planes could have been inserted into the live broadcasts. The only solution they have is to employ the "unknown top secret technology" argument, a "deus ex machina" which relegates the theory to the realm of science fiction.
 
Actually, the "NY Good Day" footage remains a big problem for no-planers as does all the other footage from the LIVE broadcasts. The second plane was captured live by seven different cameras from six news stations. No viable theory exists as to how fake planes could have been inserted into the live broadcasts. The only solution they have is to employ the "unknown top secret technology" argument, a "deus ex machina" which relegates the theory to the realm of science fiction.

Welcome to the forum. Not a bad first post.
 
The non existant holgram technology, still non existant, the energy beam weapons that would require huge generators that every one some how did notice........
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom