8 out of 8 at Citgo station

cemetery.jpg

cemeteryv.jpg
 
Childlike Empress said:
I can tell where it is (again, "behind the trees" is not the point) because i know where the view is taken from and i know where the flight paths are. I marked it for you (exactly enough) in the following overview:

cemeteryiv.jpg
Click to expand...
You posted a real flight path, and a bunch of impossible flight paths. It is impossible to fly all the yellow paths, it is call physics. You debunk yourself when you post the CIT flight paths. Which one is the real one; the cyan path. oops

After 9 years you could learn physics, why did you fail? The equation to figure out g load is easy, Balsamo and CIT will not figure it out. Balsamo spreads lies, it is his job to fleece those who lack knowledge.


PLEASE tell me how the lampposts were faked! PLEASE! Have you been to the United States; the traffic is not going 200 mph, we stop and watch idiots faking things; we call the police, we take picture, we hate liars, we hate authority, we loath stupidity. This why the lairs at CIT have failed to do more than sell DVD to idiots, a phase a lot of Americans go through; and idiot phase. CIT have to fake the idiot phase to fleece the people currently afflicted with temporary stupidity. What is your excuse for apologizing for the CIT idiots?

Any clue how the lampposts were faked with the exact time people watched a plane clip them? Any clue at all?

How was the RADAR data faked, when I have requested RADAR products they download them and they give them to me, it is NTAP or something like that. With the RADAR data I can get all, or the exact plane I want, this is a known service, we use it all the time in the USAF, many of the USAF planes do not have Black Boxes, we have to solve why it happened, the old fashion way.


Why have you failed for over 9 years to figure 77 impacted the Pentagon? When you add up the things the MIB had to fake, DNA, FDR, RADAR, it actually adds up to thousands of people in on 911, which makes it impossible. When you consider Watergate, a real conspiracy, it involved a few people compared to the idiotic fantasy you have on 911, just at the Pentagon.

Most Americans can see behind trees, because they have leaves and branches. But your lie is noted, you are no making up lies based on ignorance. RADAR proves you are a liar, and you can't debunk the RADAR. You failed, too bad Oktoberfest is so far away. Lucky I have some ashcans of Fosters, an unlimited supply. Behind the trees, that is so lame. Too bad you can't do FDR, like Balsamo and CIT, you don't do much more than spread lies. Them make money, you make up lies and post them.
 
Last edited:
I have asked funk de fino and twinstead many times during the last year to comment on beachnut's lies. They refused to do so but continue to participate in threads on the topic trying to get people to look somewhere else. In my book that shows that they weren't fooled at all by his machinations. They too are deliberately misleading the public.
 
Childlike Empress said:
I have asked funk de fino and twinstead many times during the last year to comment on beachnut's lies. They refused to do so but continue to participate in threads on the topic trying to get people to look somewhere else. In my book that shows that they weren't fooled at all by his machinations. They too are deliberately misleading the public.
Click to expand...

Paik was in the office = SOC

You have been fooled by the most foolish. It doesn't get any better than that. Unlike you, I have experiece in aerospace including FDR. Your witterings are some of the funniest I have ever seen.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Cute. I was talking about adults. Provide evidence or retract your statement immediately.
Click to expand...

Adults?? I'm in my mid 50sm, earn six figure salary, got a degree in enginning and a master in business......you are what?

Please explain how Morin could have seen a plain through a building? I don't mind if you can him a liar and/or, fair enough he might possibly be one but lets not keep up the pretense that his statement suggests anything other than a SoC route.

Ms Zakhem was across Columbia Pike from where Morin was and said the plane flew over her and Columbia Pike so again impossible to be NoC. CIT know this and call her a Shill.
 
Childlike Empress said:
I have asked funk de fino and twinstead many times during the last year to comment on beachnut's lies. They refused to do so but continue to participate in threads on the topic trying to get people to look somewhere else. In my book that shows that they weren't fooled at all by his machinations. They too are deliberately misleading the public.
Click to expand...


There is no obvious lie in that post. be specific as to what exactly you think are lies.:confused:
 
The view from the "View"... some liberties taken with the airplane type.
And Google didn't put their camera car at the right place.. not doubt under orders from the NWO.
 

Attachments

  • Pentagon-SouthView-low-A.jpg
    Pentagon-SouthView-low-A.jpg
    120 KB · Views: 2
Childlike Empress said:
I have asked funk de fino and twinstead many times during the last year to comment on beachnut's lies. They refused to do so but continue to participate in threads on the topic trying to get people to look somewhere else. In my book that shows that they weren't fooled at all by his machinations. They too are deliberately misleading the public.
Click to expand...

I don't see the lies you speak of, but regardless, good thing all this squabbling about what witness saw what and where they were and all those different paths would be soundly overridden by the preponderance of physical evidence in a court of law, wouldn't it CE? In fact, I would imagine it would probably piss off any judge if you kept insisting that your eye witnesses override the physical evidence.

Unless you have evidence of tampering. Then it's a whole new ballgame.

ETA: and yea, I'm like a broken record. The SUBSTANTIAL physical evidence overrides your witnesses. QED
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
I have asked funk de fino and twinstead many times during the last year to comment on beachnut's lies. They refused to do so but continue to participate in threads on the topic trying to get people to look somewhere else. In my book that shows that they weren't fooled at all by his machinations. They too are deliberately misleading the public.
Click to expand...

Gee, and right after that I asked you to post Paik's first path where he drew the path South of Citgo.

Anyhow, you seem to know something that we don't. Did Craig share the entire video with you yet? Oh, wait, you are again citing to their fictional movie.

Tsk tsk.

lulz1!
 
twinstead said:
I don't see the lies you speak of, but regardless, good thing all this squabbling about what witness saw what and where they were and all those different paths would be soundly overridden by the preponderance of physical evidence in a court of law, wouldn't it CE? In fact, I would imagine it would probably piss off any judge if you kept insisting that your eye witnesses override the physical evidence.
Click to expand...


I also pointed you to my posts later on that page, where i deliver the original "Edwardpointsnorth.gif". It's still up, i've checked.

And no, i don't think that the physical evidence would override the eyewitness testimony in a court of law. If you have new evidence of a crashed 757 at the Pentagon, please post it in the appropriate thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom