8 out of 8 at Citgo station

[jaydeehess]

Read it again. My contention was that anything north of Columbia Pike doesn't match the official data, and this is correct as you know.

So you are dumping the north of the Citgo idea. Good to know.

 

[332nd]

You've debunked nothing. That's why you are still here in 2010. That alone should tell you something already.

It tells me that truthers are like every other CT group. They want to it the CT so bad that no amount of evidence will convince them otherwise.

What should tell you something is the fact that in 10 years, in a time period where information is more readily available than ever before, when some truther vids have millions of hits, the truth movement can't even get 500 people together to go to DC or GZ and demand a new investigation.

 

[Thunder]

No jobs huh? Is it the economy?

Would anyone here like to debunk anything at all anytime soon?

the fact is, you guys haven't thrown us anything new to debunk for quite a while. all the major debunking was done by 2008.

 

[beachnut]

Read it again. My contention was that anything north of Columbia Pike doesn't match the official data, and this is correct as you know.

Part of the shadow of 77 went over Paik's office, this puts 77 on the south flight path as Paik points to from his office.

If you want to spew delusions; oops, no matter how many times you spew your delusion of NoC, it is not going to come true as you can't present a CIT flight path that is real. Only 77's shadow was north of Columbian Pike, and the shadow follows 77 to the Pentagon impact, almost.

This is cool you ignore the FDR for no logical reason, you don't have a clue what the RADAR data means or do you have the time to study it, but you accept the lies of CIT to be your reality. Good for you. Did you just stop your anti-depression medicine? That could cause delusions like those you have. Good luck. Maybe Craig is suffering from withdraw from anti-depressants. Could explain the delusions and his inability to understand his own witnesses who point to the real flight path you guys can't figure out.

Is Paik your key witness? Or the other guys pointing to the south flight path?

 

[Thunder]

I the truth movement can't even get 500 people together to go to DC or GZ and demand a new investigation.

oh...just you wait. 9/11/2010 is gonna be the big one!!!!

 

[jaydeehess]

Mostly we just sit and watch the idiots debunk themselves.

Read it again. My contention was that anything north of Columbia Pike doesn't match the official data, and this is correct as you know.

So you are dumping the north of the Citgo idea. Good to know.

One wonders if CE will be telling the CiT to move their path SoC but north of the commonly accepted flightpath(you know, the one the DFDR data indicates)

 

[jaydeehess]

Part of the shadow of 77 went over Paik's office, this puts 77 on the south flight path as Paik points to from his office.

.

Even astronomy indicates that the CiT are incorrect

 

[jaydeehess]

What time is the debunking scheduled for? It's getting late. Some of us need to get up for work tomorrow.

uh, A34, the CiT contention of a NofC flightpath has been debunked. Even CE seems to agree.

 

[Baylor]

Part of the shadow of 77 went over Paik's office, this puts 77 on the south flight path as Paik points to from his office.

If you want to spew delusions; oops, no matter how many times you spew your delusion of NoC, it is not going to come true as you can't present a CIT flight path that is real. Only 77's shadow was north of Columbian Pike, and the shadow follows 77 to the Pentagon impact, almost.

This is cool you ignore the FDR for no logical reason, you don't have a clue what the RADAR data means or do you have the time to study it, but you accept the lies of CIT to be your reality. Good for you. Did you just stop your anti-depression medicine? That could cause delusions like those you have. Good luck. Maybe Craig is suffering from withdraw from anti-depressants. Could explain the delusions and his inability to understand his own witnesses who point to the real flight path you guys can't figure out.

Hey beachnut I have a question. You might know it since you're an Air Force guy. How big of an object can a RADAR detect. I know it can detect airplanes because it's metal, but can it detect something like Homeland Insurgency's wife. She's bigger than an airplane but she's made up of cheese and not metal. Would a RADAR be able to detect her?

 

[jaydeehess]

oh...just you wait. 9/11/2010 is gonna be the big one!!!!

no, no, no, it won't be realllly big until the ten year anniversary, THEN the TM will be out in massive force. (probably at least a few dozen)

 

[jaydeehess]

Hey beachnut I have a question. You might know it since you're an Air Force guy. How big of an object can a RADAR detect. I know it can detect airplanes because it's metal, but can it detect something like Homeland Insurgency's wife. She's bigger than an airplane but she's made up of cheese and not metal. Would a RADAR be able to detect her?

Primary radar can pick up flocks of geese, so I'd say yes, it could pick up the Flying Nun or any other like object.

 

[Baylor]

There are several South of Citgo witnesses that truthers ignore.

 

[332nd]

Stop living in 1969 already. That's not how things are done today. I mean you are here aren't you?

You

http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com...s_iraq_protest_washington_195_eng_15sep07.jpg


Aren't

http://www.greatdreams.com/political/bush-war-criminal.jpg


Aware

http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/files/2009/04/teapartyspittsburgh-600x399.jpg

Of

http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/dc_from_monument.jpg

Anything

http://kellenebishop.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/tea-party-protest-chicago.jpg
http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2005/03/19/turkey_iraq_protest_ist105.jpg

The

http://heatusa.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/iran_protests.jpg
Internet
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41457000/jpg/_41457104_trafsqcrowdafp.jpg

Are

http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/060429/060429_protest_vmed_1p.widec.jpg

You?

http://www.ccmep.org/2002_articles/Iraq/newyork.jpg

Do not hotlink images.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson

 

[Thunder]

You

http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com...s_iraq_protest_washington_195_eng_15sep07.jpg

I still find it quite surprising, quite amazing, and a testiment to the sanity of the American people, that 9-11 Truther marches gather soooooo few people.

It shows that while we do still entertain some lunacy, we try to keep it to a minimum.

 

[Garb]

I'll post this again since CE and Algebra seem to have missed it.

Am I the only one who thinks it is pointless to discuss the NOC arguments (which asserts that the plane FLEW OVER the Pentagon) when there is an abundance of witness testimony that states Flight 77 COLLIDED with the Pentagon?

Even if we disregard the pole damage, generator damage, pentagon damage, plane parts, and whatever else you can think of.

Seriously. Eight people think they saw the plane go NOC. According to the rest of the evidence (which once again dwarfs the NOC witnesses), that can't be true. End of story.

If either of the two could explain to me how I'm wrong I would appreciate it.

Do any of you have jobs?

I currently go to a University, does that count?

Does it make a difference?

 

[leftysergeant]

Do any of you have jobs?

I'm semi-retired. It use to be my job, however, to sort out physical evidence to determine whether someone was lying about how a fire developed. I have some experience that helps me determine that the twoof movement is full of nuts and liars and dimbulbs.

Frankly, I find it hard to believe that there are people with the money to start a business who would be dumb enough to hire people who show some of the mental and moral defects that some twoofers show here.

 

[beachnut]

Reported? lol Why? Because you can't debunk anything? What does that tell you?

How do you debunk truthers who ask if people have jobs? Doubt a truther would have a job if his boss finds out he is delusional on 911 after 8 years.
Reported you to 911 truth for doing nothing for two weeks, when you could have gathered your evidence and broke the biggest story ever, and the death blow to rational people, and taken over with your delusions about 911.

... Does off topic tripe reveals a zero evidence stand and the fact truthers can't see the CIT witnesses in CIT videos pointing to the real (official as 911 truth calls all things real) flight path. You prefer posting your extensive evidence in the form of coded messages which resemble off topic trite comments while having trouble logically analyzing the CIT videos.

They point to 77 real flight path, to the south. The humor, Craig naration continues as his own witnesses refute his very words; ..., north is behind the two guys in the parking lot and to the right of the other.

I was laughing when CIT presented witnesses pointing south. Which is the real flight path? How do you dismiss the FDR and RADAR data? And how many families have you contacted with your failed moronic ideas to tell them the verified DNA is not real? Have you called CBS?

Or is all of 911 truth ...

Working hard at failing for 8 years...

 

[triforcharity]

The pole damage is interesting. CIT claims it was done by government stooges in the middle of the night. The government claims it was done by AA77. I don't think it was either. I think there was a sale on ding dongs and Homeland Insurgency's wife got a little excited and ran them down. It's a good theory backed with facts and evidence (see sig for details).

You win the thread!!

 

[Thunder]

Or is all of 911 truth ...
http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/standup.jpg
Working hard at failing for 8 years...

this is one of the more motivated truthers.

 

[nicepants]

Accusing Craig Ranke of asking leading questions is more than laughable.

If Craig did, in fact, ask leading questions, do you think that would indicate a bias on his part? Do you think that asking leading questions while conducing interviews/investigations of this type calls the credibility of the statements made by the eyewitnesses into question?