DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
The controllers in the tower a Regan National saw the plane disappear from view, then saw the smoke in the area of the Pentagon. They would have easily seen the "flyover".
8 out of 8 at Citgo station
- Thread starter 911kongen
- Start date
-
- Tags
- aa77 cit edward paik north of citgo
Childlike Empress
Banned
Childlike Empress
Banned
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
It doesn't really matter(I've seen it). What he drew (if he did it without coaching) does not match where he was and what he could actually see. There are way too many inconsistencies to consider him to be a reliable eyewitness(if his testimony was reported accurately).
Last edited:
The Big Dog
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 29,742
What if he does not "feel' like it?
funk de fino
Dreaming of unicorns
I can see why you may not want to bring it eh? Where was he when he saw Flight 77?
Childlike Empress
Banned
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
CE:
Do you have a definitive location as to where he was when he(Paik) made his observation of the aircraft?
Do you have a definitive location as to where he was when he(Paik) made his observation of the aircraft?
No semantics. Just the truth.
At 9:25 a.m., the control tower at Dulles airport observed an unidentified vehicle speeding towards the restricted airspace that surrounds the capital. [Washington Post, 12 September, 2001] The craft was heading toward the White House. "All of a sudden, the plane turned away. ...This must be a fighter. This must be one of our guys sent in, scrambled to patrol our capital and to protect our president... We lost radar contact with that aircraft. And we waited. ... And then the Washington National controllers came over our speakers in our room and said, "Dulles, hold all of our inbound traffic. The Pentagon's been hit." [Danielle O'Brien, ABC News, 24 October 2001]
That is your official story. You have nothing else. You could look for eye witnesses like CIT but you probably don't want to do that.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Liar!
Have you not seen Danielle's response to "truthers" earlier in this thread? It sucks to be you.
Last edited:
funk de fino
Dreaming of unicorns
They thought it was military. They lost radar contact but the track was given later. Its all there on the NTSB website.
Bolded part is also a lie. C130 pilot, eyewitness to that flight dissappearing near the Pentaagon at the same time as an explosion. No fly over.
Come on DGM. You called me a liar once. I proved you wrong.
You as a debunker claim to know the truth. So bring it. Because I'm getting tired of knocking down nonsense or showing how the likes of you can't even debunk nonsense. I really feel like I'm the skepic around here and all of you are trying to support some religion.
Why don't you really know what happened to the point where you can put it all to rest? Why doesn't this concern you?
Arus808
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 6,204
no you didn't
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
1. You have never shown that I called you a liar and proved me wrong.
2. You quoted Danielle O'Brien out of context when you know full well (in this very thread) what she saw and meant by her comment..
That makes you a liar.
three times considering you said you corrected me once before.
I will "man up" if you show that I'm wrong. (adults are like that)
Last edited:
That's what I said. They also thought it was a fighter.
That's what I said. So you don't have radar.
later? later don't cut it for the same reasons you cut down CIT. You got nothing.
Yeah right. I'm sure it is. Can they give me an accounting of the plane debris yet? Or do you have an excuse for that too?
You know what? Just prove your magic already. This is a forum for skeptics not religion.
Arus808
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 6,204
Algebra, more than one radar tracked the plane. They lost the radar when the crash happened. When a plane disappears off the radar, seconds before a crash, where did that plane go? Since there was no fly over (the radar would have tracked that), there is only one obvious conclusion as to what happened to the plane
There you go twisting the events and claims by those who were there.
DID you contact AA and UA about their missing planes yet? you had 2 weeks. What did you do during your hiatus. Go through withdrawals from the beat downs you get here?
There you go twisting the events and claims by those who were there.
DID you contact AA and UA about their missing planes yet? you had 2 weeks. What did you do during your hiatus. Go through withdrawals from the beat downs you get here?
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Childlike Empress
Banned
Stay on topic or get your butts reported.
Actually always quite funny where such a single line bump or comment can and predictably does lead. But who am i to judge the ways of the rationalists?
Actually always quite funny where such a single line bump or comment can and predictably does lead. But who am i to judge the ways of the rationalists?