You italicized "double digits" to emphasize how ridiculous a system that allows that is, I think, as if a 10 or 15 percent difference with victory going to the recipient of fewer votes is outrageous.
I wonder if you have given thought to just how far out of whack the system actually is.
It seems that under our current system, at its extreme, an outcome as far out of balance as 22% to 78% could allow the "22% getter" to claim victory.
I find that jaw-droppingly ludicrous.
Yes. Although politically unlikely you could win 50% +1 person in each of the following states:
Wyoming, D.C., Vermont, North Dakota, Alaska, South Dakota, Delaware, Rhode Island, Maine, Hawaii, Idaho, Nebraska, West Virginia, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Kansas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Iowa, Connecticut, Oklahoma, Oregon, Kentucky, Louisiana, South Carolina, Alabama, Colorado, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Maryland, Tennessee, Arizona, Indiana, Massachusets, Virginia, and New Jersey.
And, assuming no faithless electors or other shenanigans, win the Presidency on 50.19% of the EC vote... on the back of 21.91% of the United States popular vote.