Would you like me to take you through the claims of Thornhill and Talbott about the 'electric comet'? Nothing they predicted happened. Because nothing they predicted can happen. They said nothing about ambipolar fields arising to maintain quasi-neutrality. Want me to post what the electric comet 'model' (lol) actually says? Have you forgotten? Your woo totally failed. A long time ago. Why are you still here?
So, replying to myself to remind Sol88 what his 'model' (lol) claimed;
ELECTRIC COMET MODEL:
> Comets are debris produced during violent electrical interactions of planets and moons in an earlier phase of solar system history. Comets are similar to asteroids, and their composition varies. Most comets should be homogeneous—their interiors will have the same composition as their surfaces. They are simply “asteroids on eccentric orbits.
> Comets follow their elongated paths within a weak electrical field centered on the Sun. In approaching the Sun, a charge imbalance develops between the nucleus and the higher voltage and charge density near the Sun. Growing electrical stresses initiate discharges and the formation of a glowing plasma sheath, appearing as the coma and tail.
> The observed jets of comets are electric arc discharges to the nucleus, producing “electrical discharge machining” (EDM) of the surface. The excavated material is accelerated into space along the jets’ observed filamentary arcs.
> Intermittent and wandering arcs erode the surface and burn it black, leaving the distinctive scarring patterns of electric discharges.
> The jets’ explode from cometary nuclei at supersonic speeds and retain their coherent structure for hundreds of thousands of miles. The collimation of such jets is a well-documented attribute of plasma discharge.
> The tails of comets reveal well-defined filaments extending up to tens of millions of miles without dissipating in the vacuum of space. This “violation” of neutral gas behavior in a vacuum is to be expected of a plasma discharge within the ambient electric field of the Sun.
> It is the electric force that holds the spherical cometary coma in place as the comet races around the Sun. The diameter of the visible coma will often reach millions of miles. And the visible coma is surrounded by an even larger and more “improbable” spherical envelope of fluorescing hydrogen visible in ultraviolet light.
> The primary distinction between comet and asteroid surfaces is that electrical arcing and “electrostatic cleaning” of the comet nucleus will leave little or no dust or debris on the surface during the active phase, even if a shallow layer of dust may be attracted back to the nucleus electrostatically as the comet becomes dormant in its retreat to more remote regions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, that is what the .pdf produced by the comedy duo Thornhill and Talbott claimed. It is also what Talbott himself came on this very forum to claim would be seen at 67P. None of it was seen. For obvious reasons. With the complete failure of that woo, Sol now thinks he can claim the comet is electric because there are ambipolar electric fields which arise to maintain quasi-neutrality! And why does he do that? Because he knows very well that the electric comet 'model' (lol), as proposed by the mythologists T & T, was a complete failure. Surprising absolutely nobody.