Foolmewunz
Grammar Resistance Leader, TLA Dictator
You really need to read the post I was replying to, because your counter-argument is moot. If you did read the post, and believe that 'learning history' is the same as children espousing hard political views, training children to be 'vigilant against fascism' and 'radicaliz[ing] them politically', then your argument is downgraded from moot to simply wrong.
You made a one-line comment, not addressing the topic of the thread in any other fashion. Perhaps you need to do a better job of honing your arguments. I addressed that which was written which was a smackdown of Travis for not being a kid. How is anyone to read your post any other way?
But my post was springboarding off your post, yet addressing a common argument throughout the thread.