I love the number of people that are so certain that using extreme violence on someone for doing nothing other than following you is acceptable behaviour.
Oh, that's right. Medical examiner described Zimmerman's injuries as " very insignificant".
And the police have already stated that for a self defence claim no injury needs to be sustained so the extent of his injuries is irrelevant, other then that he did in fact have them. The police have also stated that victims of assault often over emphasize how seriously they were assaulted because they go into a state of panic.
We have no real evidence TM was trying to absh
GZ's brains in,also we DO have evidence that GZ followed TM then against police advice and approached TM.
Really? What evidence do we have that GZ followed TM? The evidence is that GZ didn't know where TM had gone, how do you follow someone when you have no idea where they went?
What evidence do we have that GZ approached TM? How do you know that TM didn't approach GZ? The consensus of the witnesses appears to put the start of the conflict at or about the T and since TM wasn't at the T when GZ walked through the first time, it would seem unusual for the conflict to start there if GZ approached TM.