• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Proving the Aurora Theater Shooting's official story false

Do you think mass murders are a recent phenomenon?

Charles Whitman is a particularly gruesome example of why they are not. He climbed up in a tower at the University of Texas and started shooting at people on the ground. He killed 17 people and wounded 32. He was shot and killed by a police officer eventually.
 
gatekeeper says he know people who were affected because they knew people who were shot in Norway. Sounds like gibberish, I say prove it. :p
What's with the tongue smiley? Did you realize that you overstepped a line and decide to admit to trolling?

Oh, and wonderful demonstration of reading comprehension there (highlighted).

And you can't deny the pictures that the press put out are laughable. They don't resemble the same bloke, yet that is what it is supposed to represent.
Perhaps you've never seen photographies other than those at cluesforum, or even had any taken of yourself, but this too is actually fairly common. I can put pictures of myself side by side and find lots of "inconsistencies" from photo to photo. What kind of camera and upload quality was used plays in, as does angle and lighting, not to mention what I'm wearing, what my hair looks like, and my facial expression at the time. I, like everyone else, look like different people in different pics, especially if you are predetermined to find differences.

So that a "mug shot" should look different than what looks to be a portrait shot should come as no surprise to anyone, except maybe the posters at cluesforum.

OneTime is likely a smear campaign disinformant troll. Ignore it.
Collegue of yours?
 
This is stupendously funny! You do realize that people who investigate crimes, look at the available evidence, and sometimes spend DAYS gathering it, right? BTW, thanks for the stundie!!

Perhaps you could ask him to find Lord Lucan. Thrre is so much evidence not there it ßhould take like five minutes...
 
OneTime is likely a smear campaign disinformant troll. Ignore it.

irony-meter-exploded.jpg
 
[qimg]http://i44.tinypic.com/33epp3b.jpg[/qimg]

(picture taken from cluesforum)

So, if I was to ask "was the camera held at the same height for both these pictures" would that be enough for you to realise why they are the same person?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rampage_killers

Rampage killings go pretty far back. In addition to the verifiable accounts listed at Los Wikis there are legendary accounts in Celtic lore, European tales Baltic/Russian tales and others.


In 1913, a guy walked into a school in Bremen (Germany) with a gun and killed 5 children. Apparently he was motivated by Jesuit conspiracy theories, which today would probably make a number of self-declared "researchers" on the internet who like that flavor of CT scream "psy-op". The same year a man killed his wife and his four children in Stuttgart (also Germany), then took a train to a nearby town where he shot 12 people. The first-mentioned is not even on those Wiki lists, as probably are dozens of other verifiable rampage killings.
 
What's with the tongue smiley? Did you realize that you overstepped a line and decide to admit to trolling?

Oh, and wonderful demonstration of reading comprehension there (highlighted).

Perhaps you've never seen photographies other than those at cluesforum, or even had any taken of yourself, but this too is actually fairly common. I can put pictures of myself side by side and find lots of "inconsistencies" from photo to photo. What kind of camera and upload quality was used plays in, as does angle and lighting, not to mention what I'm wearing, what my hair looks like, and my facial expression at the time. I, like everyone else, look like different people in different pics, especially if you are predetermined to find differences.

Not to mention that many illness can change a person's appearance and affect. In fact some forms of severe mental illness fall into this category.
 
There is no motive for a human being to go and wield bullets at random people like that, the story doesn't make sense.

Perhaps there is no motive for a healthy human being to do that, but the brain is a complex organ and when it goes off the baseline settings, it can go pretty far off the baseline settings.

The infinite variety of human behavior can be fascinating, amusing, and terrifying.

ETA: the reason truth is stranger than fiction is that fiction has to make sense.
 
Last edited:
gatekeeper says he know people who were affected because they knew people who were shot in Norway. Sounds like gibberish, I say prove it. :p

I suppose since you simply make stuff up or lie when you post (as documented below), you seem to think that everybody else does as well. I suspect that most posts on this and many BBs are genuine and honest, and that since you cannot understand what a non troll is, you cannot understand how others can actually be honest when they post on a BB.

Is honesty and truth a mystery to you?

You provide evidence for nothing at all, but expect others to jump when you say "frog" while at the same time sitting back, and being utterly incapable of doing what you ask of members of this forum.

Here is your lie:

Just because the news says a man dressed in a batman outfit shot up a cinema doesn't make it true.

Find a reliable news report which said this. Did you just make it up (a lie) deliberately distort what was said at the time (trolling) or make a stupid comment because you thought it was funny (stupidity)

Pick a box.

Norm
 
Last edited:
I'm not doubting for a second that acts of violence with weapons used are committed locally, but we are talking about a completely different kettle of fish here. No matter how much acid or shrooms or whatever pharma drugs they hand out to kids these days, is consumed, a person is not gonna go into a cinema of random people and try to kill them all. This just does not happen in reality. Only in the horror fantasy world that the media portrays does this occur.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_school_massacre
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungerford_massacre
 
In 1913, a guy walked into a school in Bremen (Germany) with a gun and killed 5 children. Apparently he was motivated by Jesuit conspiracy theories, which today would probably make a number of self-declared "researchers" on the internet who like that flavor of CT scream "psy-op". The same year a man killed his wife and his four children in Stuttgart (also Germany), then took a train to a nearby town where he shot 12 people. The first-mentioned is not even on those Wiki lists, as probably are dozens of other verifiable rampage killings.

Let's not forget the worst school killing ever (The Bath School Disaster) was a 1927 bombing in Michigan. Thirty-eight schoolchildren killed.

Technology and the means for mass killings change, and perhaps the number of horrifying events seems greater now than previously (but whether this is because of increase in killing capacity, or the fact that such killings are more widely publicized or what, I don't know), but evidently this kind of horrible event is not unprecedented.

For that matter, I can't say with certainty that the number of such events have increased over the long run, but I'd be surprised if not.
 
Is honesty and truth a mystery to you?

Honesty or truth, whatever you want to call it, aren't often prevelant characteristic traits that I see in today's 'society'. Friends and family lie to each other for various reasons, some as innocent as lying to someone to protect their feelings. People lie all the time and can justify it whatever way they like. People lie on their cv's to get jobs they other wise wouldn't be able to get, and once they're in the door the deceitful nature of humans and capitalism means that the lies don't stop there. The higher up it goes in the world of big business, the more dog eat dog it gets, and many under hand and dishonest, dis truthful, acts take place. Example, Do you think Richard Branson or Alan Sugar made their billions by being 100% honest creatures, of course you shouldn't, they told many a lie, white-lie, and trampled on weaker competitors to get where they are.

The notion of truth is barely conceivable in the modern world. You wont find truth in the adverts that we're bombarded with, or on sky tv, from what I gather even the low level free masons don't have access to much 'truth'. The internet is a big place, luckily, so at least honesty and truthful people are found all over cyber space. It's a shame some of you guys take the official line stance, because the evidence of fakery in the media goes back a long time. Here's a couple of examples of people who have set the trend for modern day fakery:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._T._Barnum

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orson_Welles

As for me saying he was dressed like batman, that was what I had thought the story went like. I had forgot about it until I came on this forum board randomly and seen the thread. But you can replace batman outfit with whatever outfit he was supposed to be wearing and my statement is still valid, as I still don't think it happened regardless of what he was supposed to be wearing.
 
Honesty or truth, whatever you want to call it, aren't often prevelant characteristic traits that I see in today's 'society'. Friends and family lie to each other for various reasons, some as innocent as lying to someone to protect their feelings. People lie all the time and can justify it whatever way they like. People lie on their cv's to get jobs they other wise wouldn't be able to get, and once they're in the door the deceitful nature of humans and capitalism means that the lies don't stop there. The higher up it goes in the world of big business, the more dog eat dog it gets, and many under hand and dishonest, dis truthful, acts take place. Example, Do you think Richard Branson or Alan Sugar made their billions by being 100% honest creatures, of course you shouldn't, they told many a lie, white-lie, and trampled on weaker competitors to get where they are.

The notion of truth is barely conceivable in the modern world. You wont find truth in the adverts that we're bombarded with, or on sky tv, from what I gather even the low level free masons don't have access to much 'truth'. The internet is a big place, luckily, so at least honesty and truthful people are found all over cyber space. It's a shame some of you guys take the official line stance, because the evidence of fakery in the media goes back a long time. Here's a couple of examples of people who have set the trend for modern day fakery:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._T._Barnum

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orson_Welles
:confused:

As for me saying he was dressed like batman, that was what I had thought the story went like. I had forgot about it until I came on this forum board randomly and seen the thread. But you can replace batman outfit with whatever outfit he was supposed to be wearing and my statement is still valid, as I still don't think it happened regardless of what he was supposed to be wearing.
Sometimes I wonder if all you CTers are all the same person. You're that predictable and similar in how you argue.

"I don't even know the basics about this case, but when I came upon this thread I thought I would lecture you anyhow".
Sigh.
 
I see you're quick off the mark there again Safe-Keeper. The thing is, after all the previous psy ops like 9/11, London 7/7 and so on, they all start looking the same so now I only bother to look at bits of what you call a 'case' because from where i'm sitting it all looks fabricated and surreal.



Edited a user name. Please refer to forum members by their user names. Do not alter a name for the purpose of insult or incivility.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Loss Leader
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see you're quick off the mark there again Safe-Keeper. The thing is, after all the previous psy ops like 9/11, London 7/7 and so on, they all start looking the same so now I only bother to look at bits of what you call a 'case' because from where i'm sitting it all looks fabricated and surreal.

The families of the victims of these massacres do not believe that the deaths of their loved ones were fabricated. Forget the CT fan mindset and have a bit of common decency.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Back
Top Bottom