Second verse
Same as the first!
Do not jump into conclusion that because the prophecy of the 2012 OG in London of the spirit failed, everything else that he says is wrong. I have been saying that not everything that the Devil says is bad. Learn to discern the truth from falsehood. Pick up what you think will be good for your soul and discard what is evil.
I am confident you remember telling us this, because you have cut and pasted it into many of your posts. Today will be a memorable day, because
I am going to take
your advice!
Let's use the post
linked to here as an example of how to read with discernment. I shall keep only what is "good", which, for purposes of this exercise, we will define according to the Victorian housekeeping maxim as
what we know to be useful or believe to be beautiful.
Ready to begin?
20120823.0135
@pakeha, #3741
Redundant. Out it all goes.
Ka Apaz was born on 1939-05-05. I think before this, her spirit lived in a Spanish woman. I will look for the name and other info in one of the tapes. Since you are in Spain, you may check this out whether this woman existed or not. I think the bodies in which Reneliniyindi lived do not decay. Incorruptible. They are as if just sleeping. It is because there is no spirit in them.
The tapes are full of gibberish, with or without that much-vaunted background music. It is not our job to find evidence of an unnamed Spaniard for you. Any body may be preserved provided it is properly embalmed--not because lack of spirits act as a prophylactic against decay. And I have no conception how you might preserve the body of someone who never ever existed!
Oh dear, that entire paragraph is just a waste. Perhaps we'll do better with the next.
Most of the time, it is the spirit of Ama who appropriates the physical body of Ka Apaz. However, sometimes, the Blessed Virgin Mary talks. Saint Evangeline, a cherubim, (named by the people) speaks with a nasal twang (“ngongo”). There is Santa Cecilia who speaks very fast. There is Angelina Imden of England who collects the bodies in which Reneliniyindi lived all around the world. There are also other male personalities, like San Gabriel. I cannot remember the others.
I myself do a splendid impersonation of Katharine Hepburn, especially at parties where martinis have been poured freely by the hostess. Hence, your paragraph proves nothing, and must be excised.
Isn't this fun?
You said:
Does anyone really take this seriously?
068 – “Ang kaluluwa at ang uod” (The soul and the maggot)
056 – “Ang sugarol na abogado” (The gambling lawyer)
003 - “Ang sawimpalad na inhinyero” (The broken-hearted engineer)
My reply:
Yes, there are people who listen to those you mentioned because they give lessons. Did you know that there are only three people in this world who while still alive were being eaten by maggots? They were King Herod the Great (who killed innocent children), Adolf Hitler (for starting World War II), and Mariano(?) Chico of Baliwag, Bulacan, Philippines. This happened to Chico because he charged exorbitant interest rate.
Red-penciled for
Godwinning the thread!!! As well as for the misinformation about maggots.
Notice in the first two messages that you mentioned, they were conversations between Ama and some listeners. Ama’s answers were extensive. The third is mainly an exposition of Ama about us, the engineers of our own soul.
That's a childish and inept metaphor, which dooms this paragraph. We don't have souls, and if we did, they would not resemble choo-choos.
The giving of money to Ka Apaz is on a voluntary basis, or not at all. You know, if only Ka Apaz charges those she had healed, she could have amassed a fortune. But until now, at age 73, she is still poor.
Have you seen her bank balance? Until you have done proper research, you have no real idea of what she is worth, do you?
Oops, my poor red pencil is worn down to the nub. Hang on while I find a new one. Okay, I'm ready for the next delectable bit of prose.
Thank you for your readiness to translate Spanish text to English. I noticed in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Spanish_monarchs , Charles I is followed by Philip II (Felipe II). Where is Philip I (Felipe I)? The Philippines was discovered by Magellan for Spain in 1521 and was named Las Islas Filipinas by Villalobos after the Crown Prince Philip II.
You earn no points for citing Wikipedia, which is edited by rank amateurs* and is infested by trolls and vandals. You have been told several times that Philip I of Spain was the husband of Queen Isabella's daughter Juana, known as "the Mad" for her insanitary habit of carting corpses around on her travels, among other odd behaviors. While she was also Henry VIII's sister-in-law, that does not make her any more relevant to our inquiry than the rest of Philip's relatives--or indeed, Philip himself.
No, I can't let this immaterial paragraph stand. Sorry.
ETA:
*I know this, because I am an editor over there.
Also, in the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_era, the year began with year one in what is 38 BC. The year 38 BC is only five years away from my determination of the birth of Jesus Christ in 33 BC. The Wikipedia entry says that “the Hispanic era probably began in the 3rd century” and lasted until the 14th century.
I think the Spanish era uses the purely lunar calendar. For example, the year 201 in the 3rd century of the Julian solar calendar is equivalent to year 239 in the Spanish era. To know what year 1 of the Spanish era is, it would be 32 BC. Jesus was born in 33 BC as per my determination based on Ama’s revelation of May 23.
Why was the Spanish era abandoned in the 14th century AD? Because the Spaniards were using the Julian solar calendar whereas the Spanish era was using the purely lunar calendar.
Pure gibberish.
But take heart--we are almost done.
What is the relevance of these to the thread? You say that Ka Apaz is just faking Ama so the prophecies did not happen. I would say that Ama gave the prophecies. Ama also revealed the May 23 birth of Jesus. He also gave the above expositions. If Ka Apaz is faking Ama, why would she give the May 23 date and make those extemporaneous expositions?
Yes, that beastly scoundrel Ka Apaz is faking all the voices, all of the idiotic revelations, and has probably been cheating on her taxes since 1959. (I have no evidence for that last bit of invective. So sue me.) Nobody knows the birthdate of Jeebus. And the reason she made "those extemporaneous expositions" (you should stick to simpler words, my friend; you can't carry off the pretense of erudition), is because she had an eager audience of unsophisticated religious zealots.
Whew! I'm exhausted. Let's see what's left of the useful and/or beautiful from your post, shall we?
<Not one word of that post is true, useful or beautiful, saith teh blue sock monkey.>
