• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Syria and UN Security Council Decision

Status
Not open for further replies.
Media literacy as in swallowing the kool-aid of an entirelly different set of biased media corps like you do?


Maybe you can explain to me why, according to Pardalis, the "regimes" (and media) of Iran, Venezuela, Russia and Syria would have "the same agenda"? A nefarious agenda, apparently. Looks to me like a Shia Theocracy, a progressive "socialist" Latin American democracy, a secular former super power with a democracy with a clear authoritarian touch, and an Arab secular police state in reform. What's their common agenda?

Independence, maybe?

Nah, guess they hate you for your freedoms. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Maybe you can explain to me why, according to Pardalis, the "regimes" (and media) of Iran, Venezuela, Russia and Syria would have "the same agenda"?

Everyone in the world (except you) knows that these countries are allies, and continuously help one another financially, militarily, and diplomatically.
 
Maybe you can explain to me why, according to Pardalis, the "regimes" (and media) of Iran, Venezuela, Russia and Syria would have "the same agenda"? A nefarious agenda, apparently. Looks to me like a Shia Theocracy, a progressive "socialist" Latin American democracy, a secular former super power with a democracy with a clear authoritarian touch, and an Arab secular police state in reform. What's their common agenda?

Independence, maybe?

Iran is obviously anti-west, anti-Israel and anti-Jews in general. Israel and the US are the main enemies. Agenda: Avoid western influence in the Middle East, weaken Israel's position.

Venezuela is run by a complete nutbag who is extremely anti-US. Pretty much everything the US does is "evil". Agenda: Attack the US in any way possible (rhetorically of course).

Russia is led by an ex-KGB officer who is anti-west and pro-authoritarian. Moreover, Syria's regime is a long-time ally of Russia. Agenda: Attack the west and protect the Syrian regime.

Syria is an authoritarian dictatorship that's fighting a rebellion. Agenda: Avoid Western influence in order to beat up on the rebels.

Common agenda: Keep the West out of Syria, come what may, no matter how many civilians that die. It would be a black eye on Western interventionist policies and would weaken the position of the US and especially Israel.

Not that hard when you excerzise some actual thinking.

Nah, guess they hate you for your freedoms. :rolleyes:

I live in Sweden. I don't think anyone hates us. Except for Norwegians.

Now, about that kool-aid you're drinking... Could you explain to me why it's more media literate to take the word of a state-sposored propaganda outlet than a Western media corp?
 
You claimed that Meyssan "is paid by the Iranian government". You showed that he works for several non-alligned media outlets, which is hardly news. Long way to go.

Journalists get paid for their work, especially when they say they are making documentaries for the channel, and these channels are controlled by the autocracies.

As a member I KNOW that this isn't the case.
Stop joking and answer my question.

You said Robert Anton Wilson "saved your soul", you brought this up. Does this mean you believe the Illuminati control the media in the West?
 
Last edited:
Common agenda: Keep the West out of Syria, come what may, no matter how many civilians that die. It would be a black eye on Western interventionist policies and would weaken the position of the US and especially Israel.


This would be all nice and dandy if not the "western" media was caught again and again to willfully spout the lies of governments and millions of innocent civilians would have died in a bogus "war on terror" in the last decade. They are still telling lies, like i've shown in this thread with diverse sources only united in their independence. I would take the word of everyone (in fact i'm trying to find the truth in sum of all of them) over that of the pre$$titudes fed with talking points by the agencies, said talking points repeated by the disgusting, completely insane Hillary Clinton on behalf of the "international community". It's deeply rotten. And the common agenda is Capitalism/Imperialism. Hope that answers your question.
 
This would be all nice and dandy if not the "western" media was caught again and again to willfully spout the lies of governments and millions of innocent civilians would have died in a bogus "war on terror" in the last decade.

I don't know if the media has ever actually been caught lying. They have been "caught" reporting stories that turned out not to be true, but given the information they had, those can hardly be called lies. Of course, there are exceptions. Climate Science has been lied about a lot, but that's mostly by ideologically driven journalists and not by decree from management. A couple of so called "news outlets" like the AFP has been known to partake in a fair bit of lying as well, but again, it's mainly because of ideology.

None of this has any bearing on what I wrote, of course. It's a complete non-sequitur.

They are still telling lies, like i've shown in this thread with diverse sources only united in their independence.

I think you are making a logical fallacy here. You do realize that your sources are under scrutiny here, don't you? You can't really use those same sources as a roundabout way of reaffirming the veracity of themselves.

I would take the word of everyone (in fact i'm trying to find the truth in sum of all of them) over that of the pre$$titudes fed with talking points by the agencies, said talking points repeated by the disgusting, completely insane Hillary Clinton on behalf of the "international community". It's deeply rotten.

I think your hate is blinding you here.

And the common agenda is Capitalism/Imperialism. Hope that answers your question.

Not really. Again, why is it more media literate to take the word of a state-sponsored propaganda outlet than a Western media corp?
 
You mean if my statement that Bob saved my soul from CT thinking means that I think the western media is controlled by the Illuminati? Is that your question?

You must think they are controlled by the same entities, since you brush them off as being the same.

BTW, you weren't saved from CT thinking, you still believe a plane didn't crash at the Pentagon. You're knee deep in it.
 
Last edited:
I think i've reached and am reaching my intended audience, with the help of the inventors of the Nazi left.

I don't even know what you're talking about anymore.

Is this a competition for you? Just an argument in a slew of arguments on the internet that must be won?

You do realize that people are actually dying, right? Like, right now?

ETA: I'd ask you again (third time) to answer my question, but I know you won't, so I won't bother.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom