Syria and UN Security Council Decision

[Childlike Empress]

I'm still waiting for the answer. You keep dancing around it.

I asked you if i've assessed your question correctly and you dodged. So, is this your question (#456)?

 

[Childlike Empress]

ETA: I'd ask you again (third time) to answer my question, but I know you won't, so I won't bother.

kthxbye.

 

[Pardalis]

I asked you if i've assessed your question correctly and you dodged. So, is this your question (#456)?

I asked my question in plain English in post 439.

Now answer.

And answer uke2se's question.

 

[Pardalis]

kthxbye.

I'm perseverant, so I'll ask his question:

Why is it more media literate to take the word of a state-sponsored propaganda outlet than a Western media corp?

 

[Childlike Empress]

The answer to your laughably ignorant question is of course no, Pardalis. No. And I wasn't joking the first time i've answered it.

 

[Pardalis]

Why is it more media literate to take the word of a state-sponsored propaganda outlet than a Western media corp?

BTW, you can't be part of the Illuminati, because it doesn't exist.

 

[trustbutverify]

Won't You Help?

All over the world iron-fisted sociopaths are being victimized by mobs of sub-humans selfishly pursuing some scrap of freedom and self-determination. Many of these so called "people" have had their instant coffee spiked with hallucinogenic drugs by Zionist agents.

You can help. The Assad Foundation provides a place where genocidal dictators can turn when it seems like the whole world has turned against them.

We ask that you look into your heart and make a donation. You will receive a photo and a thank-you letter from an incredibly wealthy and grateful murdering thug. You will also be in some pretty good company.

Time is running out. Won't you help?

 

[Pardalis]

Childlike, why is it more media literate to take the word of a state-sponsored propaganda outlet than a Western media corp?

The question is pretty straight-forward.

 

[Pardalis]

Funny that Childlike thinks Le Monde, the NY Times, Reuters, CNN, Al Jazeera, The Globe and Mail all have the same agenda and are conspiring together, but thinks see that the sates of Iran, Syria, Russia and Venezuela don't.

Nah! They're just "independant".

 

[Virus]

They're resisting imperialism. Or something.

 

[Pardalis]

They're resisting imperialism. Or something.

"Imperialism" being democracy, free press and free speech.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Last week:

BAGHDAD — The departure of al-Qaida-affiliated fighters from Iraq to join the rebellion against Syrian President Bashar Assad in Syria has had one benefit, Iraqi officials say: Violence has dropped in this country, in some areas by as much as 50 percent in just a few months.

 

[Virus]

Childlike, I was wonder if you could settle a little matter. Do you support the Assad regime because he's an enemy of the West and therefore an ally of convenience or do you support him because you personally believe in the vision of a tyrannical, fascistic and totalitarian society?

 

[Childlike Empress]

None of the above. I don't support Assad at all, I support International Law and the Syrian people and do my part in preventing them from facing the hellish fate of the Libyans by providing an objective view (or the other side, if you will), which is lacking in the hysterical, ultra-corrupt and openly lying corporate media of "the West". Actually, taking the opportunity to show the cracks in the propaganda facade is an even more important personal motivator in of itself than anything about Syria.

 

[trustbutverify]

Childlike, I was wonder if you could settle a little matter. Do you support the Assad regime because he's an enemy of the West and therefore an ally of convenience or do you support him because you personally believe in the vision of a tyrannical, fascistic and totalitarian society?

Why not both?

 

[trustbutverify]

None of the above. I don't support Assad at all, I support International Law and the Syrian people and do my part in preventing them from facing the hellish fate of the Libyans by providing an objective view (or the other side, if you will), which is lacking in the hysterical, ultra-corrupt and openly lying corporate media of "the West". Actually, taking the opportunity to show the cracks in the propaganda facade is an even more important personal motivator in of itself than anything about Syria.

Translation: If rape, torture and murder are necessary to fight the "Great Satan", than so be it.

 

[uke2se]

None of the above. I don't support Assad at all, I support International Law and the Syrian people and do my part in preventing them from facing the hellish fate of the Libyans

Ah, the hellish fate of the Libyans after their "protector" Ghadaffi fell:

I bet those fireworks are full of CS gas.

by providing an objective view (or the other side, if you will),

"Objective" meaning "biased".

which is lacking in the hysterical, ultra-corrupt and openly lying corporate media of "the West".

So instead we should trust the government owned propaganda outlets CE likes because they tell her what she already believes. Apparently that's more "media literate".

Actually, taking the opportunity to show the cracks in the propaganda facade is an even more important personal motivator in of itself than anything about Syria.

I'm confused. You're working to show the cracks in the propaganda facade that you're presenting as factual sources?

 

[Childlike Empress]

I'm confused.

It shows.

 

[angrysoba]

There is an important interview here with a British photographer who was evacuated after being injured in Homs:

http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16181228

 

[uke2se]

It shows.

Might want to respond to all the points in a post rather than trying to squeeze in a pathetic excuse for a putdown. It would show a bit more class, and it would show that you're actually an intelligent person.