Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 61,684
How?
Because when you're angry enough, laws don't matter. Neither do the property rights of others.
Provided, of course, that you're on the right side.
How?
Because when you're angry enough, laws don't matter. Neither do the property rights of others.
Provided, of course, that you're on therightLeft side.
I lean towards 'talk is cheap'. ymmv.So as long as she got paid for it you wouldn't mind?
I have to admit you haver the courage of your convictions!
People who oppose fractional reserve banking are, quite simply, nuts. Fractional reserve quite simply means that banks cannot take all of their depositors' money and lend it out; they are required to reserve a fraction of that money. Let's assume for a second that fractional reserve banking is eliminated, and the banks cannot lend out any of their depositors' money. What would happen? Well, you know all those fees that you hate that the bank charges you every month? They'd go through the roof, because now instead of the interest on bank loans paying salaries for all the tellers and those nice bank buildings, instead you'd be paying for it.
So when we hear railing about fractional reserve banking, we know the person is insane. And people who are insane about the banks usually bring the Jews into it pretty quickly, because for many centuries Jews were the bankers of Europe due to the Christian strictures against usury (the charging of interest).
The biggest problem with raising the reserve limits (which is all that 100% reserve banking really means in an accounting or economic sense) is not fees as such but instead various restrictions and probably fees for withdrawing your deposits and a much higher debt-to-equity ratio for banks than under the current scheme.
The libertarian types who oppose fractional reserve banking surprisingly argue that the financial sector is one which needs much more government intervention while all other sectors require little or none. Somehow they think that financial service professionals need an ominous state apparatus to control their activities but nobody else does.
The JihadJane types are simply Eustace Mullins copycats who use the code words "capitalist", "banker", and "American" to mean Jews.
It's a complex interplay of brain chemistry in the limbic system.How?
The sad fact is that there are a few genuine anti-semites on this board.
Well, I have seen threads on JREF where posters who betray no anti-semitism, yet who want to talk about the Fed, or Fractional reserve banking elicit, 'the joos' comment or something similar.
So when we hear railing about fractional reserve banking, we know the person is insane. And people who are insane about the banks usually bring the Jews into it pretty quickly, because for many centuries Jews were the bankers of Europe due to the Christian strictures against usury (the charging of interest).National Socialist Germany did not use the Jewish banking system and they did pretty well in recovering from the Depression.
Though I find your question absurd I suppose it deserves a serious reply none the less.How?
The odds of what? Political expression? 4 died at Kent state. What did that prove? People died protesting totalitarian regimes like China and the soviet union. What did that prove?The odds are getting worse.
The odds of what? Political expression? 4 died at Kent state. What did that prove?
Agreed 100%. As are people who oppose the Volker rule.People who oppose fractional reserve banking are, quite simply, nuts.
National Socialist Germany did not use the Jewish banking system and they did pretty well in recovering from the Depression.
.gif)
Obamaville LA group released from custody. And yes, they fit the California stereotype:
Oh, the humanity!
So if your wife cheated on you openly, would that be okay? I just find it really strange, I'll admit.
Furthermore, if a teacher was discovered to have done porn, and was asked to resign by the district, would you believe that the district did the wrong thing??? I know you'll probably worry about overprotection, but I do believe teachers must try to the best of their abilities to be moral beacons for their students. And that means standards as small as not having been working in porn in the past or present.
School (at its best) is a place where children learnabout diversity.
I've often strugled to convey this sentiment but could never quite put into words. Well said.School (at its best) is a place where children learn about diversity. Diversity isn't a rainbow coalition around a campfire with everyone singing "Row Your Boat" in rounds. It's the realization that we're all different and some people may be outside your comfort level but they're still worthy of your respect.
Asks the guy who denies the Communists killed and tortured millions of people.
Yeah, the ones doing the complaining are young and they've just realized that the people they've been told will protect them, won't. That passion and zeal count for nothing and that they can be treated as less than human. It's a harsh lesson. One that most often gets taught to people who are willing to buck the status quo.
It's also an impossible point to empathize with if one has never acted on their convictions, or has only done so within safe limits.