Occupy Wall Street better defend its identity

Status
Not open for further replies.
The sorry bastard who introduced the senate bill which ultimately let the banksters run wild and start creating investment instruments out of total crap was not a Jew. He was an arrongant WASP from Texas. He introduced the bill at a time when Grover's punks controlled both houses of congress, and America has been paying for it ever since, while he and his wife live high on the hog from the bribes that the least ethical of the banksters paid for her lobbying efforts.
And when BO's punks controlled both the Senate, House and white house, they did what to change it?
 
And when BO's punks controlled both the Senate, House and white house, they did what to change it?

Yopu can't turn that one back on the Democrats. They told Grover where to stick it.

The GOP has run like a pack of Pavlovian dogs. Grover rings the bell and they are ready for dinner.

Democratic planning sessions are a cat roundup. We kind of like people to think.
 
Fail. Evidence that the GOP filibustered the Dems specific legislation restricting/repealing the creation of derivatives and the investment in them.
Just one example of many.

Grover's punks don't let anything good even clear the applicable committee if killing it does not make them look like they want soldiers to starve.
 
Yopu can't turn that one back on the Democrats.
Democratic planning sessions are a cat roundup. We kind of like people to think.
So they can't get it together enough to fix the things you claim the GOP screwed up, even when they control the WH, Senate, and House. Pretty lame.

The GOP filibustered the wall street reform bills that were brought up by the Democrats.
Just admit that you don't have the evidence that the GOP filibustered the Dems specific legislation restricting/repealing the creation of derivatives and the investment in them, rather than floundering around and throwing out stuff, hoping to save face.
 
Asks the guy who denies the Communists killed and tortured millions of people.
Two questions:

Who was that?

What the hell has that to do with the fact that Grover's punks are feeding the rich out of our pockets?
 
So they can't get it together enough to fix the things you claim the GOP screwed up, even when they control the WH, Senate, and House. Pretty lame.

The Senate is a strange place, it takes a while to get rid of the useless members. There are still Democratic senators who snuck in when the party was shifting to the right. The senate rules give them too much power when the split is close. Still, the majority of Democrats were trying to getthings done while a few of them toyed with the idea of trying to win the hearts and "minds" of the right-wingers. That can be fixed. Only about ten Democrats need to be replaced.

As for Grover's punks in the Senate, you can't fix stupid. Send therm all home.
 
Still, the majority of Democrats were trying to getthings done while a few of them toyed with the idea of trying to win the hearts and "minds" of the right-wingers.
So no evidence that when BO's punks controlled both the Senate, House and white house, they did or even attempted to do anything restricting/repealing the creation of derivatives and the investment in them?
 
It's funny because BooKitty says the movement is about piecemeal legal reforms and Bikerdruid says it's a revolution and you'll be murdered if you get in their way.

Which one is it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom