You are getting there. Try again, though. Take a look at the actual evidence with a more objective critical eye and maybe you'll see it.
Ahemmm, I guess I am gloating a bit about the thread, especially considering all the baggage that went with it.
But that part about contributing, naahh, I don't think so. I was trying to find the PMF and there were so many forums when you search Google for "Knox forum" that I couldn't find it. Could someone fill me on on what PM stands for or post the link again? I'm just curious.
Oh, thanks. I guess I really am not up on my Filomena, and assumed she was quoted BECAUSE she was the former roommate. Thanks for the clarification.
The human brain has a hardwired function called confirmation bias. If we aren't aware of it and don't make a conscious effort to override confirmation bias then our brains simply filter out as invalid any 'facts' that contradict what we've come to earnestly believe.
Can someone please explain to me how, after essentially two trials, a convicted criminal for a prosecutor, proven lies by police, prosecution, forensics testimony (shown on video no less), can there still be those who will still only believe the lies spread by the prosecution propaganda campaign that started 4 years ago. Lies that have either never been proven to be true or have been disproved during this appeal trial? I've gotten so frustrated and angry at another site I just finally had to stop responding because I was getting really snarky in my posts. I just cannot wrap my head around this way of viewing this trial. I'm generally a pro prosecution person! I almost always view what the defense does as smoke and mirrors to find any kind of reasonable doubt, but this case went beyond my reasonable doubt threshold into complete did not do it. Which in all honesty has only happened one other time. The judge said, paraphrasing here, that they didn't do it, not that there was reasonable doubt. The judge said there was no break in staging, it was a break in. I'm totally befuddled and frustrated at the attitude of some!!!!
Right, it was a stunning victory for the defense. Hellman basically ruled that the whole theory of Knox and Sollecito's involvement was an error and a fantasy. This is why I was shocked that CNN ran that piece tonight (I posted the link here, but no one took notice ) , saying that we will never know the truth, that Knox and Sollecito might actually have been part of the murder, etc.Something I found interesting from the verdict after both viewing the video and reading a translation. Not only did the court find that Amanda and Raffeale did not commit the murder, but they ruled that the crime of staging a crime scene "did not exist". Basically, they ruled that the staged break-in was not staged!!
Isn't that what so many of us have been saying all along?
Thanks. Guess I was looking for forum, but now that you name it, I recall the web site. It's been a while since I kept up with this thread. Which makes me wonder if Fiona will ever come back? I wish she would. We rarely agreed in the financial threads, but one needs people with different views if one wants to learn anything.
Yes but that seems like so many years ago....Really? PMS..errr PMF? And you started this thread?
No, it was PMF. Remember, I haven't been following this thread for a very long time. Like Fiona but for different reasons, it became too hostile and I saw no reason to put up with it. I guessed wrong that it stood for 'P.M. Forum' but I recall now the 'murder file' website. I remembered the Friends of Kercher group, but had forgotten about the other.
