Eek. The newspaper review on Sky News is showing a side headline in tomorrow's Times which alludes to the Kercher family "not being ready to forgive". I hope that this is either an invention or a misinterpretation. If that's based on something that anyone from the Kercher family has said after the verdicts, then I'm saddened and dismayed, and my view on the Kerchers will be changing.
That might just be a report of what Lyle said at the press conference, and I think Aline (?) or Steph Kercher might have echoed it. Something to the effect of needing closure before forgiveness.
I think that British Consulate representative might best have served their needs if he'd given them a phone number of a good English (or Scottish or Welsh) lawyer, one at least familiar with the Italian legal system and its munificent wonders. For one thing, as Fine pointed out last week, the money coming from the courts to pay the Kercher's legal fees has just evaporated. I dunno, maybe there's something else Italy does for the families of victims to pay their bills, or perhaps the UK does, but I don't think they can afford Maresca's wages on the government's dime. Going by the numbers listed by Fine (from somewhere in Massei as I recall) it appears the Kerchers may now owe Maresca hundreds of thousands of Euros.
I recall an interesting discussion I came across down the
Rabbit Hole once, probably from way back, when as I recall it they were discussing the hiring of Maresca. The point was made that if the victim's family hires a lawyer and there's a 'civil part' then the case (if it's of this serious nature of course) virtually always ends up in a conviction. Some of them, being bunnies and all, didn't understand the causation fallacy there and assumed that the Kerchers just hiring a lawyer 'guaranteed' a conviction all the way through, whereas more cogent actors over there made the point it doesn't quite work like that, the main factor is of course strength of case, and lawyers will turn down the civil part if there's no virtual certitude of victory unless they have deep-pocketed clients.
This suggests to me that it's
possible that one of the reasons for Maresca's desperate tactics was he knows he has to win to get paid--or he's going to have to bill (presumably) John Kercher. I also noticed Tom over there was interested in the resolution of the civil case before PMF went down, and I'm pretty damn sure he was one of the participants in that discussion I noted previously.
I dunno, what do you think? Is this the face of a humanitarian? What happens if he sues for his fee in Italy, will it be honored in the UK?