So arguing against religion is disgusting? And the fact that 1.6 billion believe in it gives it credence?
ANTPogo said "It almost disgusts me that I have to do the above,..." The 'above' being highlighting errors which are easily avoided by reading reliable sources which are freely available. Plus, that you are making generalisations about a large group of people with very obvious differences of opinion regarding their beliefs.
However, I think 'disgust' is a bit of a strong word. Why?
Because I think your mistakes are honest. So many of your comments have had no real understanding of the posts you quoted that I feel you have a genuine difficulty with reading comprehension. I realise there's no way of saying that without making it sound like a personal attack, but I intend it as a defence of you: you are not mean or intentionally bigoted. I would say you are a good person, just not able to follow a conversation. You tend to see in words what you expect to see rather than what is present. Which is why you see reflexive defense of Islam from people who have criticised Islam -- I provided examples to Bill Thompson, ANTPogo linked to a thread where she criticised some aspects of divorce. (I think that was one of my examples, too).
Perhaps it would be more instructive to link to a conversation where things went better. You asked:
What I don't understand is why you argue so hard in defense of Islam. Is it the exoticness of it? Is it because you think they're the poor oppressed minority?
It's been explained, but you didn't get it. To correct your generalisations is not the same as saying there is no instance in which what you say applies.
It might help to give an example in which people discussed the understanding of another religion:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=147318
In post 5, Marksman comes in to correct the opening post. What do you think his motives were? How was his position on the matter dealt with by other people in the thread? What about when Parky (Thunder), who identified himself as a Jew, said:
correct. this is a Khabbalistic belief, one that I have NEVER heard of before.
i was taught, that all souls will be resurrected when the Messiah comes. but reincarnation???? this is not a jewish idea.
Are the references which show this is wrong a defence of reincarnation and/or Judaism?
When Parky says:
If a Catholic priest said something like this, the ADL and other groups would rise up in comdemnation. But because this is a rabbi, silence prevails.
=(
Do you feel anykind of empathy for his position?
Does this sound familiar?:
First off, I don't believe in karma, so please don't think I scrib to the rabbi's beliefs. I've studied them -- I don't accept them.
Please read the thread. You'll see my own position changing. As well as other people understanding what Marksman was saying. It's a matter of bringing about understanding to people who had gotten things wrong.
Plus you'll see a debate on a topic which you, perhaps, are less emotional about. Maybe then you will see what is happening here.
Again, I say this to you becuase I think it is worth my time to say this to you. It is not like when I post responses to Bill Thompson, which I now do only because I think people other than Bill might benefit from them.