• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
tmd2_1 said:
Believe what you want to believe...it's all in that video..and it would take you about 15 seconds to find more videos of the subject. I would post them...but I know what your response will be. If you really want to you can find them yourself.
Click to expand...

Tell me, how much gas and shoe leather have you gone through investigating 9/11?
 
tmd2_1 said:
Yeah i'm difficult to communicate with. The members of this forum...seem to seek nothing more then to ridicule and disrespect anyone who dares to disagree, and present evidence contrary to their dogma.
Click to expand...

Faith does not constitute evidence.

Every talking point put forth by some other individual and referenced by you as "evidence" has already been considered, debunked and dismissed.

The fact that it may be new and noteworthy to you doesn't mean that it has any meaning to the rest of us.

You want validation of your religon, there are plenty of websites where yiu'll be another voice in the amen chorus, and other than that, not much of anyone will listen to you.
 
Craig4 said:
Tell me, how much gas and shoe leather have you gone through investigating 9/11?
Click to expand...

What is the point in that question? I mean the answer is not much...but I'm sure you are going to tell me how much you did....can't wait to hear it.
 
tmd2_1 said:
What is the point in that question? I mean the answer is not much...but I'm sure you are going to tell me how much you did....can't wait to hear it.
Click to expand...

I've exerted none for the simple reason that I'm not advancing a theory. This is your theory, you need to produce evidence. You've not even bothered to collect any.
 
BStrong said:
Faith does not constitute evidence.

Every talking point put forth by some other individual and referenced by you as "evidence" has already been considered, debunked and dismissed.

The fact that it may be new and noteworthy to you doesn't mean that it has any meaning to the rest of us.

You want validation of your religon, there are plenty of websites where yiu'll be another voice in the amen chorus, and other than that, not much of anyone will listen to you.
Click to expand...

My same post still applies. What's debunked to you, is far from debunked to me, and I would think most people who really look at the evidence. I mean what did I hear about the 5 dancing Israelis...oh it's nothing...it's some vague story..yeah that's really good debunking right there.
 
Craig4 said:
Tell me, how much gas and shoe leather have you gone through investigating 9/11?
Click to expand...

It seems that anyone with an 'net connection and an axe to grind is a 9/11 "Investigator."

How many of them could spell the word investigator before that day, nobody knows, and considering the level of professional expertise displayed by these cats, I'd hazard a swag that none of them are trained professionals in the field.
 
Craig4 said:
I've exerted none for the simple reason that I'm not advancing a theory. This is your theory, you need to produce evidence. You've not even bothered to collect any.
Click to expand...

We're going around in circles....I just told you anything I would show you would not be "evidence" there's always some reason to dismiss it...it's not just many people on here....how you can look at that video...and not be a little suspicious is beyond me...but as I said believe what you want to believe.
 
tmd2_1 said:
This isn't just a weird thing. Think about it...he comes walking in with a piece of evidence...from the biggest crime scene in history. Removing evidence from a crime scene is in fact a crime. Comes into a studio with it...you think the FBI would be all over it. But nothing, not a thing..this guy was never heard from again. Could he have gone on TV just to try to sell a lie? I can't prove it...but it makes some sense
Click to expand...

This one small tidbit proves that it was an inside job?
 
BStrong said:
It seems that anyone with an 'net connection and an axe to grind is a 9/11 "Investigator."

How many of them could spell the word investigator before that day, nobody knows, and considering the level of professional expertise displayed by these cats, I'd hazard a swag that none of them are trained professionals in the field.
Click to expand...

Do me a favor...Mr Big time investigator...look at this video by Jon Cole...it's all self contained...even Ryan Mackey and Fred Greening said more tests should be run. Watch the video and do exactly what he says....prove him wrong by experiment...for someone as smart as you that video should be done in just a few hours right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=channel_video_title
 
If we're going to be addressing topics other than that of the OP can we at least chose one? I've seen this thread shotgun through hani Hanjour's piss poor flying, melted steel, thermit, WTC 7, dancing israelie's, and remote controlled aircraft. I thought topic swings like this were the reason why the general discussion thread was made...
 
Last edited:
tmd2_1 said:
We're going around in circles....I just told you anything I would show you would not be "evidence" there's always some reason to dismiss it...it's not just many people on here....how you can look at that video...and not be a little suspicious is beyond me...but as I said believe what you want to believe.
Click to expand...

There's nothing to dismiss. You've not provided anything.
 
tsig said:
This one small tidbit proves that it was an inside job?
Click to expand...

Didn't say that..infact I have never ever said it was an "inside" job. Simply that I believe the evidence is more in the favor of an alternative theory. Which all I really would hope anyone is...at least willing to open that your long hold dogma may be incorrect (whatever the subject may be) it just seems like people here have trouble with that. They bend over backwards to hold on to their beliefs...no matter what the evidence....when if someone presents to me a good case and evidence, I will change my theory or beliefs.
 
Grizzly Bear said:
If we're going to be addressing topics other than that of the OP can we at least chose one? I've seen this thread shotgun through hani Hanjour's piss poor flying, melted steel, thermit, WTC 7, dancing israelie's, and remote controlled aircraft. I thought topic swings like this were the reason why the general discussion thread was made...
Click to expand...

Way to avoid my question...I await your video.
 
Craig4 said:
There's nothing to dismiss. You've not provided anything.
Click to expand...

I am going to post the same thing I posted to that other lovely fellow...I really do await your video.


Do me a favor...Mr Big time investigator...look at this video by Jon Cole...it's all self contained...even Ryan Mackey and Fred Greening said more tests should be run. Watch the video and do exactly what he says....prove him wrong by experiment...for someone as smart as you that video should be done in just a few hours right?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=channel_video_title
 
Grizzly Bear said:
If we're going to be addressing topics other than that of the OP can we at least chose one? I've seen this thread shotgun through hani Hanjour's piss poor flying, melted steel, thermit, WTC 7, dancing israelie's, and remote controlled aircraft. I thought topic swings like this were the reason why the general discussion thread was made...
Click to expand...

Point taken. I've started a new thread for the Israeli connection. I can't wait to see what the crank lobby comes up with.
 
Craig4 said:
Point taken. I've started a new thread for the Israeli connection. I can't wait to see what the crank lobby comes up with.
Click to expand...

I will say..all I have done is defend myself to those who have challenged me...I did not mean for this to get off topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom