• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I had to go to the hose shop today and I asked the guy. He rolled his eyes and said "it's a *********** nightmare". lol

NYC hydrants use two types. New York Corp and another. Out here we "mostly" use a different thread from those two (I think he said NPT, which is pipe thread) but some towns use the NYC threads.

I just got off the phone with a good buddy of mine in FDNY who I haven't spoke with in a while. He confirmed that depending on the location, and use, it may have different threads.

Color me suprised. I always assumed they were universal.
 
5 seconds? Out of over 70 confiscated security videos. Maybe what happened after is what is being hidden.

No matter. The fact that government agents were in place to confiscate all of the over 70 security videos proves foreknowledge that the Pentagon was going to be attacked.

BAHAHAHAHHAHAHA you think they were "in place" sitting there waiting to confiscate them? You think they were all confiscated immediately following the event? How long after was each confiscated? Post proof or retract this utter hogwash of a statement. Do something you've never done when asked, SOURCED SUPPORT for your statements.
 
Christopher 7:{bolds mine}
in the WTC 7 report Firehouse magazine is referenced as the source of the quote by Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
"Early on, we saw a bulge in the SW corner between floors 10 and 13, and we put a transit on that, and we were pretty sure that she [WTC 7] was going to collapse."
He had just seen the towers come down. He is not a structural engineer and he was completely wrong.

The report goes on to state that at approx 1:15 pm the Chief in charge of operations at WTC 7 recommended that efforts in WTC 7 be given up and that a group of FDNY Chiefs discussed both the condition of the building and the capabilities of the FDNY to fight the fires in WTC 7. They formed conclusions about these including that no water was "immediatly" available to fight the fires, and that the building was generating loud noises that indicated that the structure was "unstable"
this is referenced to FDNY interviews in the winter of 2004.
The chiefs did not write that, NIST did.

Now you can nitpick all you want but the building was declared unsafe to enter and there was no water immediatly available to fight the fires WERE THE DETERMINATIONS MADE by the Chiefs in charge.
Or so we are told.
There was water and personnel available to fight the fires in WTC 7.

Are you now stating that these Chiefs were in on it,
I wish y'all would stop making that stupid accusation over and over and over. The only people who have been saying that are the OCT loyalists.

or coerced or threatened, into ordfering men out of WTC 7 in order to allow a building to be brought down by means other than the fires.
In Barbie doll land that could never happen.


"no water was "immediately" available to fight the fires"
That is "NIST speak" and it is not true. People here, including someone claiming that he was there, talk about priorities, but there is nothing in any report to back that up nor did any of the chiefs say anything about priorities. That's just a diversion tactic used here.

[FONT=&quot]This debate is about the NIST claim that no water was available to fight the fires in WTC 7

Chris Mohr said:
NIST says the building was eventually no match for the flames that raged out of control for several hours after the firefighters were unable to pour any more water on it.
[/FONT]
The evidence shows that they had enough water and personnel to do what needed to be done.

NCSTAR 1-8 pg 205 [pdf pg 259]
9:10 10-84 Engine 240, (At staging area West and Albany Streets when WTC 2 collapsed, stretch hoselines, relay water from Marine 1, extinguished fire at 90 West Street.)

9:17 Engine 286/10 (initially out of service, back in service at 0917, relocated to E-10, arrived at WTC 1 when it collapsed, relayed water from Marine 1, fought fires from upper floors of 85 West street to 90 West street)

9:27 Engine 311 (stretches lines from Marine 1 to 85 West Street, from inside of 85 West Street extinguishes fires on roof of 90 west Street)

9:40 Engine 162 (post collapse operations WTC 1 and WTC 2, operations at WTC 7, hydrant at Church and Vesey Streets, stretched line to WTC 7)

9:41 Engine 219 (post collapse operations, established water supply at West and Liberty Streets, stretched hose lines and extinguished ground level fires)

9:43:04 10-84 Engine 220, (Command post West and Liberty Streets, approaching WTC 2 at collapse, extinguish fire on 9th floor of Gateway Plaza, assisted with water relay from Marine 1 to Vesey and West streets) WTC 6&7

9:55 Engine 246/244 (post collapse operations 5 WTC, hydrant hookup on Broadway and Church Streets, water relay to E 503, operated hose line on street level fires at Church and Liberty Streets)
Engine 284/207 (post collapse operations, hose line stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7

9:59 a.m. WTC 2 collapsed

NCSTAR 1-8 pg 223 [pdf pg 277]
9:59:51 Engine 271/6 (left Command Post at West and Vesey Streets when WTC 1 collapsed, supplied water to standpipe Siamese at Verizon Building, extinguished fires around Verizon bldg.)

10:06 Engine 160 (post collapse operations, supplied water to Tower Ladders operation on WTC 7

10:07:39 10-84 Engine 284, (post collapse operations, hose line stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey street) WTC 6&7

10:12: Engine 518 (post collapse operations, stretched hose lines and operated in WTC 7)

10:15 Engine 236/15 (responding to scene when WTC 1 collapse, stretched handlines from building standpipes and extinguished street level fires)

10:24 Engine 247 (Command Post at Broadway and Vesey Streets, post collapse operations, hydrant hookup and supply to hoselines to Tower Ladders)
Engine 318/279 (post collapse operations, Staging area at West and Chambers Streets, hose stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7

10:29 a.m. WTC 1 collapse

NCSTAR 1-8 pg 228 [pdf pg 282]
10:30:08 10-84 , Engine 318/E 279 (post collapse operations, Staging area at West and Chambers Streets, hose stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7

10:32:30 10-84, Engine 247/E240 (Command Post at Broadway and Vesey Streets, post collapse operations hydrant hookup and supply of hoselines to Tower Ladders)

10:38:32 10-84 , Engine 309 /E33, (reported to Command Post at West and Liberty streets, stretched 3 ½ inch hoselines from command post to Marine Companies at pier, stretched supply lines from Marine 2 to E 209 E 279, stretched supply lines to manifolds and Tower Ladders, searched collapse area)

10:45 Engine 514 (hooked up to hydrant in front of 80 West Street, stretched 3 ½ inch line to Ladder 15 in front of 90 West Street)

10:49 Engine 309/33 (reported to Command Post at West and Liberty Streets, stretched 3 ½ inch hoselines from command post to Marine Companies at pier, stretched supply lines from Marine 2 to E 209 and E279, stretched lines to manifolds and Tower Ladders, searched collapse area)

11:10:21 10-84, Engine 206 (hooked up to serviceable hydrant at Nassau and John Streets, relayed water to E221 that was supplying a Tower Ladder, stretched and operated hoselines at Liberty Street debris fires)

11:19 Engine 155 (search of 5 WTC, supply hose lines to debris pile of WTC 2, hooked up to serviceable hydrant at Church and Murray Streets)


There was no shortage of help. There are more calls about people in reserve and more coming all the time.
This is just an example.
NCSTAR 1-8 pg 232
10:29:53 Battalion Chief 37 reports that eight bus loads of firefighters are located at the Manhattan Bridge.

NCSTAR 1-8 pg 233
10:46:25 Battalion Chief 32 reports from Manhattan Bridge that busses are over Bridge to staging area at City Hall Park.
 
Jesus talking about not getting it....

So who WAS 'in on it' then, Chris? It's almost as if you think we are debating this issue in the Halls of Congress and not in a relatively obscure internet forum.

You should take your earth shattering revelation that there was plenty of water to fight the WTC7 fires-- and therefore the fact it was decided to redirect every resource available to save lives in other areas and let the unoccupied WTC7 collapse is suspicious--to the NY Times. I'm sure they'll run with it.

LOL
 
Last edited:
He had just seen the towers come down. He is not a structural engineer and he was completely wrong.

The chiefs did not write that, NIST did.

Or so we are told.
There was water and personnel available to fight the fires in WTC 7.

I wish y'all would stop making that stupid accusation over and over and over. The only people who have been saying that are the OCT loyalists.

In Barbie doll land that could never happen.


"no water was "immediately" available to fight the fires"
That is "NIST speak" and it is not true.

Total crap. They were still trying to get more water to the scene. Notice all of the trucks arriving to relay water. At some point, the decision was made that it was unsafe to entered the buiilding and the tower hose streams were not going to be very effective. Combine that with the fact that the building was bulged out and making noise suggestive of imminent collapse were moore than enough reason to consider it a waste of water that was needed elsewhwere.

There was no shortage of help.

Not a true stsatement. This was a larger operation than could have beeen expected. There were never enough people going over the wreckage looking for victims.

There are more calls about people in reserve and more coming all the time.

Get a clue what "reserve" means. You cannot just run a fire fighter woithout a break until the scene has been secured. You would have people keeling over dead from exhaustion. From some of the health complaints I have seen ereported, a lot of people did spend more time on the pile and breathing noxious crap than was good for them. You need resewrves to releive those fighting a long fire at reasonable intervals. What Clausewitz said about the use of reserves in war also applies in fire fighting operations.
 
Last edited:
He had just seen the towers come down. He is not a structural engineer and he was completely wrong.
Says you? Says the monday morning quarterbacks? In the moment, with all the available data perhaps he was wrong, perhpas though he was quite correct. After all the structure DID(did,did,did) collapse.


The chiefs did not write that, NIST did.

NIST references it as an interview with FDNY

Or so we are told.
There was water and personnel available to fight the fires in WTC 7.

Have any Cheifs disputed what was written by NIST, Chiefs that wee involved with this 2004interview?

I wish y'all would stop making that stupid accusation over and over and over. The only people who have been saying that are the OCT loyalists.

Well just answer the question or tell us why the Chiefs told an untruth in 2004.
In Barbie doll land that could never happen.

So, you are saying that they were threatened?

More later going to work
 
He had just seen the towers come down. He is not a structural engineer and he was completely wrong.
Keep diggin'.

wtc7pile.jpg


Looks like a perfectly fine building to me.

Do you actually have to try to be this dumb?
 
Total crap. They were still trying to get more water to the scene. Notice all of the trucks arriving to relay water.
Notice all the water available at WTC 7 and the firefighters who were conducting operations at WTC 7?

NCSTAR 1-8 pg 216 [pdf pg 270]
9:40 Engine 162 (post collapse operations WTC 1 and WTC 2, operations at WTC 7, hydrant at Church and Vesey Streets, stretched line to WTC 7)

9:43:04 10-84 Engine 220, (Command post West and Liberty Streets, approaching WTC 2 at collapse, extinguish fire on 9th floor of Gateway Plaza, assisted with water relay from Marine 1 to Vesey and West streets) WTC 6&7

9:55 Engine 284/207 (post collapse operations, hose line stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7

10:06 Engine 160 (post collapse operations, supplied water to Tower Ladders operation on WTC 7

10:07:39 10-84 Engine 284, (post collapse operations, hose line stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey street) WTC 6&7


10:12: Engine 518 (post collapse operations, stretched hose lines and operated in WTC 7)

10:30:08 Engine 318/279 (post collapse operations, Staging area at West and Chambers Streets, hose stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7

10:32:12 10-84 , Engine 328/E 279 (post collapse operations, Staging area at West and Chambers Streets, hose stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7


At some point, the decision was made that it was unsafe to entered the buiilding
The question is, who made that decision? You believe what you are told by NIST. I have caught them lying about the fire on floor 12 so I don't take their word for anything.

waste of water that was needed elsewhwere.
You don't know that, nor do you have a source for your assumption. Neither the firefighters or NIST mentioned priorities being a factor. You just made that up.

Not a true stsatement. This was a larger operation than could have beeen expected. There were never enough people going over the wreckage looking for victims.
Try reading the whole . . . . never mind, you won't do that. They had firefighters coming from all 5 boroughs and Jersey. You are just talking.
 
In the moment, with all the available data perhaps he was wrong, perhpas though he was quite correct. After all the structure DID(did,did,did) collapse.
You started off OK but went into deep denial. He was completely wrong. The damage he was concerned with had nothing to do with the collapse which began at the other end of the building. You know that yet you still manage to block it out and make statements like that.

NIST references it as an interview with FDNY
That does not make it so.

Have any Cheifs disputed what was written by NIST, Chiefs that wee involved with this 2004interview?
Google "Serpico".

Well just answer the question or tell us why the Chiefs told an untruth in 2004.
I have answered that question many times. Read my recent responses on this thread.

So, you are saying that they were threatened?
Possibly.
 
Notice all the water available at WTC 7 and the firefighters who were conducting operations at WTC 7?

NCSTAR 1-8 pg 216 [pdf pg 270]
9:40 Engine 162 (post collapse operations WTC 1 and WTC 2, operations at WTC 7, hydrant at Church and Vesey Streets, stretched line to WTC 7)

9:43:04 10-84 Engine 220, (Command post West and Liberty Streets, approaching WTC 2 at collapse, extinguish fire on 9th floor of Gateway Plaza, assisted with water relay from Marine 1 to Vesey and West streets) WTC 6&7

9:55 Engine 284/207 (post collapse operations, hose line stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7

10:06 Engine 160 (post collapse operations, supplied water to Tower Ladders operation on WTC 7

10:07:39 10-84 Engine 284, (post collapse operations, hose line stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey street) WTC 6&7


10:12: Engine 518 (post collapse operations, stretched hose lines and operated in WTC 7)

10:30:08 Engine 318/279 (post collapse operations, Staging area at West and Chambers Streets, hose stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7

10:32:12 10-84 , Engine 328/E 279 (post collapse operations, Staging area at West and Chambers Streets, hose stretch from Marine 1 to Vesey Street) WTC 6&7


The question is, who made that decision? You believe what you are told by NIST. I have caught them lying about the fire on floor 12 so I don't take their word for anything.

You don't know that, nor do you have a source for your assumption. Neither the firefighters or NIST mentioned priorities being a factor. You just made that up.

Try reading the whole . . . . never mind, you won't do that. They had firefighters coming from all 5 boroughs and Jersey. You are just talking.
Will you still be doing this in twenty year's time? I can think of better hobbies.
 
There was no water available for fighting the fires in WTC7, because all the water that was available was needed for higher-priority operations.

We know that search and rescue operations, maintaining security of site access and egress (e.g. controlling vehicle fires), and protection of facing properties were higher priority than extinguishing an evacuated building. We know that because those are always higher priority at any fire scene.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
There was no water available for fighting the fires in WTC7, because all the water that was available was needed for higher-priority operations.
You don't "know that". No one said so in any of the interviews that I know of. Y'all are just stating your opinions.

Found one more:
10:06:01 10-84, Engine 271/E 6, (left Command Post at West and Vesey Streets when WTC 1 collapsed, supplied water to standpipe Siamese at Verizon Building, extinguished fires around Verizon bldg.)
 
a.) Fighting fires and supporting recovery operations at the two occupied towers that collapsed

or.

b.) Fighting fires in an unoccupied building


Tough choice.
 
You don't "know that". No one said so in any of the interviews that I know of. Y'all are just stating your opinions.


But I do know that. And anyone who bothers to check fire scene priorities from any source about firefighting (firefighting manuals, fire department operational policies, general-audience books about firefighting, asking actual firefighters) can know it also. Even just applying logical thought (e.g. considering why it benefits the firefighters and the public to prioritize things that way) will get you pretty close to understanding, save for some details that one might overlook due to lack of direct experience.

Those who refuse to check such sources might continue to not know it. But those people's views do not matter.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
You don't "know that". No one said so in any of the interviews that I know of. Y'all are just stating your opinions.

Yes, we do know that, because the fire fighters involved, in their oral histories of the event, state that the building looked unsalvageable, so they pulled the operation to concentrate on other buildings and the rescue effort.

Anybody who thinks these are not more important that risking lives to extinguish a building that looked ready to fall down is utterly, without hope of redemption, ignorant of how a fire department works.

10:06:01 10-84, Engine 271/E 6, (left Command Post at West and Vesey Streets when WTC 1 collapsed, supplied water to standpipe Siamese at Verizon Building, extinguished fires around Verizon bldg.)

That was one of the higher priorities. That building didn't look like it might fall down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom