• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Clear evidence that 9/11 was an inside job

FatFreddy88 said:
...
Let's hear your analysis of this proof.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm
Click to expand...

The guy who did it is a moron. No analysis is possible because it is pure fantasy.

He shows aircraft burning on the ground, when 77 was flying at 488 knots.

Physics of the impact prove it was a 757 going 488 knots, but you prefer idiots who make up lies, and you think they have something because you can't do math or physics to save yourself from being mislead and repeating lies from morons.

But go ahead take this stuff you posted to the cops, CBS, or 20/20, you are wasting time there, we already know you are spreading lies because you lack the knowledge and skill to think rationally. Who have you told? FBI? What will you do with your failed fantasy?

The web page lies, no video frames are missing the camera was at the gate, it has a bad lens, it has a frame rate of a second or so, and would not catch a 488 knot aircraft clearly anyway. The shadow of 77 can be seen, it is the right size, and your claims failed over 9 years ago.

RADAR and FDR show it was 77, DNA seals the deal and now you spit on the dead falling for the lies of 911 truth nuts, and repeating debunked junk. You are evidence free, your sources are evidence free. You don't have a clue what evidence is.

You have failed to read the posts made to you, you are open-loop SPAM, regurgitating lies. You are a follower, not a leader, you are spreading lies for lairs, and you don't care.
 
Last edited:
FatFreddy88 said:
Look at the top picture in this link.
http://0911.voila.net/index3.htm

You can see the tail above the left side of the box. I don't know the technical name for it but it lifts and lowers the pole that stops traffic.


I looked at the above view in the third photo from the top in this link.
http://www.flugplatzsiedlung.de/Pent_gate.pdf

The point where the green line touches the red line is about where the plane was and that's about as far from the camera as the point where the protruding wall ends on the right.


Not much because the craft seems to be about two thirds the length of a 757. It's really pretty obvious just looking at it without doing any measuring.


I measured the lines in this picture.
http://www.flugplatzsiedlung.de/Pent_gate.pdf
(third from top)

The difference was about twenty percent. If we do the calcs with a thirty percent difference which is obviously too much, the craft is still shorter than a 757.

Let's hear your analysis of this proof.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm
Click to expand...

Freddy I've never been fond of spam, pretty awful stuff really. I'll be nice and hand it back to you.
:spam1:spam1:spam1:spam1:spam1:spam1:spam1


Mind you don't eat too much before dinner, don't want you spoiling your appetite.
 
Literally dozens of people saw a jet flying toward the Pentagon, and several saw it hit.
Click to expand...
There are plausible explanations that would explain this so it isn't conclusive proof.

This video address that issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk
(eight parts)

The theory is that a 757 actually flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it and the killer plane came in at a different angle.

I have to stop now as this cybercafe is about to close. It's after midnight here in Madrid.
 
I don't think his web sites cited are safe, be-careful going to his sources, just noticed some strange pop-ups.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
There are plausible explanations that would explain this so it isn't conclusive proof.

This video address that issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk
(eight parts)

The theory is that a 757 actually flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it and the killer plane came in at a different angle.

I have to stop now as this cybercafe is about to close. It's after midnight here in Madrid.
Click to expand...
That is your cover story, for your IP cover?

At 488 knots, a plane can't land at an airport behind the Pentagon, and eye witnesses watched 77 enter the Pentagon. The USA is an open society, we do the paper work and can get the FDR, it shows impact at the Pentagon, the flight path, and RADAR backs that up. For your lies to be true, the FAA is in on it, the military is in on it, the NTSB did it, the FBI did it, and more, the police, the civilians who saw 77 impact, etc. Why do you like to call people liars when they are telling the truth, and you are spreading moronic lies made up by idiots?
 
Last edited:
FatFreddy88 said:
There are plausible explanations that would explain this so it isn't conclusive proof.

This video address that issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk
(eight parts)

The theory is that a 757 actually flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it and the killer plane came in at a different angle.

I have to stop now as I realize I've had my ass handed to me.
Click to expand...

Fixed that for ya
 
FatFreddy88 said:
I have to stop now as this cybercafe is about to close. It's after midnight here in Madrid.
Click to expand...
Cool story bro. Buenas noches. Espero que al levantarse mañana, se le ha encontrado tu capacitad de pensar de manera crítica. LOL.
 
Last edited:
where do you guys get the funny emotes that aren't available in the options?


Aw crap. Was that off-topic? Ok.

Freddy - where were you on 9/11?
 
NoahFence said:
where do you guys get the funny emotes that aren't available in the options?


Aw crap. Was that off-topic? Ok.

Freddy - where were you on 9/11?
Click to expand...

When you're posting click more beneath the smilies list and use the drop down menu that appears to look through them all.
 
What happened to the aircraft? What happened to the passengers and crew?
Why were the remains of the passengers and their DNA found at the crash site if the aircraft didn't crash?
 
Ok, folks, even though he's calling from the PF911T playbook, he's also citing some CIT myths. And let's be honest: Between the two of them, there's only a shade of difference; they're essentially two sides to the same coin of Pentagon no-planer lunacy. One group looks at the electronic jet evidence, the other really harps on witnesses and NOC, but they both deny the basic events and cite from a central canon. And we here all know what that canon is.

So, because of the more-than-superficial-resemblance, I quote Ryan Mackey's post from 2008, where he summed up the essential reasons Pentagon no-planerism is crazy:
R.Mackey said:
... So let me see if I've got it straight:

According to the Citzen Investigation Team, the Government or whomever wanted to fool the world into thinking American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, along a certain heading that took it through several light poles and low over the freeway just prior to impact.

To do this, They executed the following:
  • They flew an aircraft over the Pentagon
  • The aircraft traveled along a different heading entirely, on the opposite side of a visible landmark (viz. the Citgo station)
  • The aircraft passed nowhere near the light poles in question
  • The light poles were sabotaged anyway, in some completely different fashion than aircraft impact
  • One light pole was staged to penetrate the windshield of a car, in traffic, again despite the actual aircraft not passing anywhere near overhead
  • A large amount of explosives was detonated as the aircraft passed by
  • The aircraft then flew away over the Pentagon, where it was allegedly sighted by at least one individual
  • The explosion or whatever demolition carried out at the Pentagon left a hole far too small to have been caused by AA 77
  • A readable flight data recorder (FDR) was planted (along with an insufficient amount of aircraft debris) that allegedly conflicts with both Their false story and the track of the actual aircraft
And, finally,
  • The aircraft in question was deliberately painted so as to not even resemble an American Airlines jetliner.
I am reasonably certain that the above is the stupidest hypothesis ever conceived for any purpose, including parody, intentional humor, or even stress tests of human perception in psychological experiments.

In the future, I plan to take no notice whatsoever of the Citizens Investigation Team, other than to link back to this post. From here, there is simply no return. I deeply pity the minds that are snared by such utter madness.
Click to expand...

Has our latest truther not cited some of the above points yet? That's true, he hasn't. Not yet. In spite of that, my response: Just wait. We've all seen the trajectories these guys have taken before. After about 3 or 4 pages, look back and see how many of those he ends up dusting off. You'll probably be able to make a BINGO game out of it. :D
 
FatFreddy88 said:
There are plausible scenarios that would explain the light poles and the witnesses.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=9632
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=17179

Witnesses can be planted. That would have to be part of a plan this large.
Click to expand...

I believe when all evidence and witness testimony was tallied up there were 133 people that SAW a PLANE hit the Pentagon. Aside of the people you claim to be "in on it"...you are also calling 133 people plants and liars with no conscience. Do you fathom how big the conspiracy is that you are claiming exists?

Take a look: http://www.debunking911.com/massivect.htm
 
FatFreddy88 said:
The evidence shows that a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon. Our not knowing what happened to the passengers doesn't make that evidence go away. There are a few plausible scenarios. We just don't know which one is the true one.

In this link there's a documentary called "Painful Deceptions".
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

It's also on YouTube.

In the last five minutes of part one a possible explanation for the passengers and the DNA is put forth.
Click to expand...

OMG he just linked Eric Hufschmid...really...dude do you even understand the man that made that nonsensical video? I suggest you research WHO you are getting your information from.
 
Freddy seems to have run off to his mommy for now.

"Mommy I posted my fairy story on JREF and they hated it!"

I wonder if this spam-monkey will come back, perhaps he enjoys being kicked when already down.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
If somebody ever tried to go public, we'd never hear about it as the press is controlled.
http://www.thismodernworld.org/arc/1993/93short-attention-span.gif
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=chomsky+media&aq=f
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=Wi5h3vZl6uo
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=William+Schaap++-+The+Media,+CIA,+FBI+&+Disinfo.+&aq=f
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media/MediaControl_Chomsky.html
http://www.chomsky.info/articles/199710--.htm
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media/media_watch.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Propaganda/Propaganda_page.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media_control_propaganda/Media_Control.html
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/official_culture.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=trWcqxrQgcc
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman /Propaganda_System_One.html

Also, if someone tried to go public, something would probably happen to him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU
Click to expand...

You are aware that we live in reality and not in a movie, correct?
 
FatFreddy88 said:
There are plausible explanations that would explain this so it isn't conclusive proof.

This video address that issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGvXVzdlcQk
(eight parts)

The theory is that a 757 actually flew over the Pentagon and landed at the airport behind it and the killer plane came in at a different angle.

I have to stop now as this cybercafe is about to close. It's after midnight here in Madrid.
Click to expand...

So a 757 flew past the pentagon and landed at Reagan Intl Airport, on THAT day, and NO ONE saw this at Reagan? A MAJOR US HUB! Sorry, the 757 didn't fly over the Pentagon, it smashed right into it.
 
Oz1976 said:
So a 757 flew past the pentagon and landed at Reagan Intl Airport, on THAT day, and NO ONE saw this at Reagan? A MAJOR US HUB! Sorry, the 757 didn't fly over the Pentagon, it smashed right into it.
Click to expand...

Did you even read what you wrote?

REAGAN International. As in RONALD REAGAN. Former US President. Republican.

Clearly, he's in on it too, or they would never have renamed it.

:jaw-dropp
 
NoahFence said:
Did you even read what you wrote?

REAGAN International. As in RONALD REAGAN. Former US President. Republican.

Clearly, he's in on it too, or they would never have renamed it.

:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

Awe Crap!!! I guess I should just call it Washington National Airport, like the dem's love too :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom