• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

CIT Ranke and Marquis make cover of OC Weekly

Yes they have rocketed past delusional.
There should be a separate galaxy named after the CIT.
 
From Gustave
This record wouldn't have been possible without cover boy Craig Ranke (drop the pretentious "CIT" label, Craig: what are you, a doctor of divinity?), who contributed an obsessive 23 comments, all trying to assert Nick libeled him and fellow honorific wielder Aldo Marquis. When I asked Craig to detail specifically how Nick libeled the two, not only did he comment back, but he emailed me the comment as well. Bit OCD there, aren't we?
Click to expand...
 
"Capt. Bob" concerns me. His behavior is.........disturbing. For those of you actively flying planes for hire, please tell me there are checks and balances?!

It really, really disturbs me that someone at the controls of a plane I might be flying on can behave this way. I am not talking about his moon bat theories. Everyone is entitled to their opinion(s).

I am talking about his (seemingly) willingness to move from the computer screen, to a personal confrontation.
 
Is claiming someone committed libel without that actually being an established fact... actually libel in itself?

I can't wait for the little CIT to go to court. That would be worth reporting on.
 
SlightlyAboveApr said:
It really, really disturbs me that someone at the controls of a plane I might be flying on can behave this way. I am not talking about his moon bat theories. Everyone is entitled to their opinion(s).
Click to expand...

He does not have a current Medical Certificate. Believe me, there are plenty of people who will be very interested if he renews it.....
 
Mangoose said:
Mr. Herbert: I'm hitting myself for not thinking of doing that re-do of the cover first! GJ, mate!
Click to expand...


thanks, I was going to place a different object in Ranke's hand... but I'm quite certain the mods would have been on that. (no pun ladies)
 
Totovader said:
Is claiming someone committed libel without that actually being an established fact... actually libel in itself?

I can't wait for the little CIT to go to court. That would be worth reporting on.
Click to expand...
The funny thing is they are probably bragging to friends about the article.

Either way, it's going to be a cold day in heck (heck I tell you) before any other (remotely) MSM news source does a story on them. Not just because its a non-story, but all the trouble of dealing with the CIT-heads.
 
I know that the CiT shout 'libel' but have they actually said they will pursue action in court yet?

Odd that their defence of accusations of libel against Llyod England was, IIRC, that Mr.England was not pursueing such court involvement. Somehow it proved that they were right about him being an operative. So we can then conclude that if the CiT do not take action against Schou that it constitutes an admission by them that Schou's representation of them is in fact true.
 
jhunter1163 said:
Lloyd England probably doesn't even know that these morons are libeling him so. Maybe someone should clue him in.
Click to expand...


Pleeaaase... You give CIT far too much credit. There's a reason Lloyd is possibly unaware of what Craig and Aldo are doing, and that reason is because they're utterly insignificant.

They have no noticeable affect on anything.
 
Cap'n Bob is a blowhard. He won't actually do anything physical. I've met numerous troofers with potty mouths and violent tendencies on Internet forums. They tend to be small and wimpy in person.
 
One other thing I noticed, from the first comment thread at the OC Weekly, was yet another tantalizing glimpse into their beliefs:

CIT Craig Ranke said:
He [Schou] goes on, “-pause for circus music- a magic trick in which a military plane painted to resemble an American Airlines jet flew low over the Pentagon while explosives took down a wall of the structure in a convenient cloud of smoke, thus allowing the plane to fly away and secretly land somewhere, presumably at nearby Reagan National Airport. Unfortunately, their film The PentaCon, doesn’t provide any evidence of this.”

We don’t provide evidence for this because it is not our claim. We never said the decoy jet in question was painted to look like an AA jet and in fact we claim the opposite. The evidence we provide suggests that it did not look like an AA jet since most independent witnesses we spoke with describe different colors.
Click to expand...
Source

This little detail is new to me. So let me see if I've got it straight:

According to the Citzen Investigation Team, the Government or whomever wanted to fool the world into thinking American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, along a certain heading that took it through several light poles and low over the freeway just prior to impact.

To do this, They executed the following:
  • They flew an aircraft over the Pentagon
  • The aircraft traveled along a different heading entirely, on the opposite side of a visible landmark (viz. the Citgo station)
  • The aircraft passed nowhere near the light poles in question
  • The light poles were sabotaged anyway, in some completely different fashion than aircraft impact
  • One light pole was staged to penetrate the windshield of a car, in traffic, again despite the actual aircraft not passing anywhere near overhead
  • A large amount of explosives was detonated as the aircraft passed by
  • The aircraft then flew away over the Pentagon, where it was allegedly sighted by at least one individual
  • The explosion or whatever demolition carried out at the Pentagon left a hole far too small to have been caused by AA 77
  • A readable flight data recorder (FDR) was planted (along with an insufficient amount of aircraft debris) that allegedly conflicts with both Their false story and the track of the actual aircraft
And, finally,
  • The aircraft in question was deliberately painted so as to not even resemble an American Airlines jetliner.

I am reasonably certain that the above is the stupidest hypothesis ever conceived for any purpose, including parody, intentional humor, or even stress tests of human perception in psychological experiments.

In the future, I plan to take no notice whatsoever of the Citizens Investigation Team, other than to link back to this post. From here, there is simply no return. I deeply pity the minds that are snared by such utter madness.
 
R.Mackey said:
I am reasonably certain that the above is the stupidest hypothesis ever conceived for any purpose, including parody, intentional humor, or even stress tests of human perception in psychological experiments.
Click to expand...


But thats exactly why I find the CIT threads so enjoyable. It's so stupid its funny.
 
R.Mackey said:
One other thing I noticed, from the first comment thread at the OC Weekly, was yet another tantalizing glimpse into their beliefs:


Source

This little detail is new to me. So let me see if I've got it straight:

According to the Citzen Investigation Team, the Government or whomever wanted to fool the world into thinking American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, along a certain heading that took it through several light poles and low over the freeway just prior to impact.

To do this, They executed the following:
  • They flew an aircraft over the Pentagon
  • The aircraft traveled along a different heading entirely, on the opposite side of a visible landmark (viz. the Citgo station)
  • The aircraft passed nowhere near the light poles in question
  • The light poles were sabotaged anyway, in some completely different fashion than aircraft impact
  • One light pole was staged to penetrate the windshield of a car, in traffic, again despite the actual aircraft not passing anywhere near overhead
  • A large amount of explosives was detonated as the aircraft passed by
  • The aircraft then flew away over the Pentagon, where it was allegedly sighted by at least one individual
  • The explosion or whatever demolition carried out at the Pentagon left a hole far too small to have been caused by AA 77
  • A readable flight data recorder (FDR) was planted (along with an insufficient amount of aircraft debris) that allegedly conflicts with both Their false story and the track of the actual aircraft
And, finally,
  • The aircraft in question was deliberately painted so as to not even resemble an American Airlines jetliner.

I am reasonably certain that the above is the stupidest hypothesis ever conceived for any purpose, including parody, intentional humor, or even stress tests of human perception in psychological experiments.

In the future, I plan to take no notice whatsoever of the Citizens Investigation Team, other than to link back to this post. From here, there is simply no return. I deeply pity the minds that are snared by such utter madness.
Click to expand...


I would actually love to see those fools lay their delusion out in bullet points like that. I'm confident that it would contain immense idiocy which will continue to be completely hidden from them, but will be out there in all of its hope-for-humanity-crushing glory for everyone else to see...

I also completely understand why they will never do such a thing.
 
I don't know who did a better job of making CIT look like insane, paranoid jerk-offs . . . OCW's respected reporters, or CIT and friends by posting the comments that they have.
 
R.Mackey said:
This little detail is new to me. So let me see if I've got it straight:

According to the Citzen Investigation Team, the Government or whomever wanted to fool the world into thinking American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, along a certain heading that took it through several light poles and low over the freeway just prior to impact.

To do this, They executed the following:
[...]
And, finally,
  • The aircraft in question was deliberately painted so as to not even resemble an American Airlines jetliner.

I am reasonably certain that the above is the stupidest hypothesis ever conceived for any purpose, including parody, intentional humor, or even stress tests of human perception in psychological experiments.

In the future, I plan to take no notice whatsoever of the Citizens Investigation Team, other than to link back to this post. From here, there is simply no return. I deeply pity the minds that are snared by such utter madness.
Click to expand...

You see? How on Earth can they believe this stuff? It's not even good self-parody.

Their best guess is that it's a white plane with a blue stripe, with numbers on the tail (numbers, not letters, insists Reyes). Possibly with 'reflective properties' leading some (like Lagasse and Turcios) to think it was silver. Stephens also saw its tan belly as it neared the tan ground and was amazed. SPreston found its sky blue color of the scrap on the lawn a smoking gun. Sunlight white while in flight, at least according to witnesses mostly to the south. The amazing 'plane of many colors,' to paraphrase the old bible story.

This of course proves military deception.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom