Official story supporters can only DENY, for them everything I tell is meaningless.
Any way, you can continue to tell such baseless and meaningless opinions, you are just telling unsupported opinions. That changes nothing to the facts and I am still waiting your explaination "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".
Do not use the words like coincidence, level off, successive take offs; NONE of these claims are reasonable in that case.
- Coincidence is impossible because it's repeated in all 4 cases, regardless take off delays, duration of previous hijacks durations.
- Level off times are not consistent with deviation times, some deviations are before level off, some others are too much later.
- Initial take offs are not planned to be successive, the last flight was delayed too much to make it take off only 4 minutes before the first impact.
In other words, you failed as MISERABLY as Bush Administration to explain "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".
Lets look at your original chart:
http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/11timeline.jpg
Here's how I see it:
The ideal plan for the hijackers was to minimize the time that authorities would have to react. That would mean taking over each plane as soon as the previous one crashed.
So here's what I think happened:
First of all, they
got ahold of airline flight schedules, and chose flights based on how well they fit their plans.
As part of this process, they
did some simple math and calculated how long it would take from takeoff to crash for each plane (factoring in the time of the takeovers). Then they met prior to the flights and
synchronized watches.
When they arrived at the airport they
noted the delays and
adjusted their schedules (possibly confirming by cell phone with each-other while still in the airport). Fortunately for them only one plane was delayed significantly, so they only had to shift things around
so that UA93 would be the last plane taken over rather than the third.
The takeoff of
AA11 was delayed by nine minutes, hence the hijackers knew that this flight's time of
impact would be likewise delayed and therefore the
takeover of the next planes would also have to be delayed by nine minutes. So while there is almost no delay between the leveling off of AA11 and the takeover, the next two hijacks had delayed takeover times of about 9 minutes.
Now the
third plane to be hijacked was
supposed to be UA93, but
because it was delayed by 41 minutes the hijackers calculated that
AA77 would reach it's target first, and so they switched AA77 to third plane in the sequence and moved UA93 to last.
Hence after figuring in the 9-minute delay, they calculated that AA77 would crash at about 9:40, so therefore the team on UA93 would have to takeover at about that time, and they did.
So please explain what aspect of this explanation is impossible:
Is it "impossible" for the hijackers to meet in advance? Yes/no.
Is it "impossible" for the hijackers to acquire plane schedules? Yes/no.
Is it "impossible" for the hijackers to perform math and make calculations? Yes/no.
Is it "impossible" for the hijackers to synchronize watches? Yes/no.
Is it "impossible" for the hijackers to agree to a schedule for plane takeovers? Yes/no.
Is it "impossible" for them to adjust thier schedules while at the airport according to announced delays (as described above)? Yes/no.
What part of this explanation is "impossible?"
: