Muslim researcher explains how 9/11 was made

DGM said:
Requires about 5 minutes. Are you afraid to admit the data (and countless real world experiences relayed here) proves that you're wrong.

We know it's embarrassing to admit something you worked on for years was shown to be wrong with 5 minutes work. Admit it, caulk it up to experience and spend 10 more years on another "theory".
Click to expand...

The work is not 5 minutes. It's not only opening a web page and notice some numbers. It requires at least about two hours of intense investigation to check everything.

Secondly, this is not one of my main claims. The 41 minutes delay of UA93 is only a secondary aspect that will not change teh conclusions of my work.
 
When I first clicked on this thread and read the OP I seriously thought it was from 2003, when these bizarre theories first came about....

Fella - they chose what planes to hijack based on how far they were going to go - which ones had the most fuel. These radical Muslims, being able to afford a cross-country trip on an airplane, most likely can also afford a watch. Even still, they didn't need to, nor did they, synchronize anything beyond a short window. All were taken within an hour of each other if I can recall.

That you're still even arguing this point is silly.
 
mehmetin said:
The work is not 5 minutes. It's not only opening a web page and notice some numbers. It requires at least about two hours of intense investigation to check everything.

Secondly, this is not one of my main claims. The 41 minutes delay of UA93 is only a secondary aspect that will not change teh conclusions of my work.
Click to expand...

Thirdly, your book doesn't have any physical evidence (photographs) to support your lunacy!
 
Last edited:
EventHorizon said:
Because according to mehtmin, Muslims are the ONLY group of people on the entire planet who don't do bad things or hurt people.
Click to expand...


Muslims = just fine.

Radical Muslims = not so much.

Same thing for every religious group. Christians have wacko's, Jews have wacko's....

Actually, do Buddhists? They seem pretty cool peeps.
 
NoahFence said:
Muslims = just fine.

Radical Muslims = not so much.

Same thing for every religious group. Christians have wacko's, Jews have wacko's....

Actually, do Buddhists? They seem pretty cool peeps.
Click to expand...

According to mehtmin though, there are no radical Muslims. Just good honest caring loving Muslims. I also believe that according to him only Jews can do bad things, but it's hard to understand him sometimes. I don't speak crazy.

If you're really looking for his POV you may want to read this thread from the beginning, but since you are a new poster I feel obligated to warn you that the stupid might make your brain melt. It's best to tackle this thread only a few pages at a time.
 
EventHorizon said:
If you're really looking for his POV you may want to read this thread from the beginning, but since you are a new poster I feel obligated to warn you that the stupid might make your brain melt. It's best to tackle this thread only a few pages at a time.
Click to expand...


That's what I'm doing...I started to feel a little nauseous, with a slight headache and stroke-like symptoms. These are signs of early onset brain melt. So I stopped.
 
abaddon said:
Why do you think CDI uses det-cord and never uses remote control?
Click to expand...

When you need small amount of explosives, you can access empty buildings, can make all kind of holes, study the install places of all explosives, put cables everywhere, there is no need to use radio controlled explosives.

Radio controlled explosives requires longtime preparation, able to place thousands of explosives, possibility of misplacement, it's technologically more expensive. We must consider the radio controlled CDI as the "luxury" of the demolition.
 
preptic said:
And you failed to address this:

"And where did the explosion patterns you would expect from controlled demolitions go? A couple of "booms" won't be sufficient to take down a building."
Click to expand...

The explosion patterns are visible, you just need to look them carefully. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFz9TZUyIZk

You can find teh succession of two explosives distant by 3 floors (see slide 51 of my power point) and after that you can find the succession of explosives on every floor. For the sound, as the explosions happened inside the core, between two steel parts, the building acted like silencer to redce the sound; any way the sounds are still audible.
 
mehmetin said:
When you need small amount of explosives, you can access empty buildings, can make all kind of holes, study the install places of all explosives, put cables everywhere, there is no need to use radio controlled explosives.

Radio controlled explosives requires longtime preparation, able to place thousands of explosives, possibility of misplacement, it's technologically more expensive. We must consider the radio controlled CDI as the "luxury" of the demolition.
Click to expand...

You understand that the demolition of WTC 1 was nearly three times the size of the world record demolition, right?

And that "they" had to do it again for the 2nd tower?
And that WTC 7 was twice the size of the world record?

There is no way explosives were used. None.
 
sheeplesnshills said:
So the planes can fly autonomously for the very hardest parts of their flight but not all???? That makes no sense. The flights up to a minute or two before impact are the easy part. So if they can fly the last minute or two autonomously it makes no sense to say they can't do the whole flight that way from soon after take off (just as it is done in a Tomahawk missile).
Clearly succession is not a requirement of any reasonable system nor proof of anything.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Nothing proves that the last part is teh easiest one. Your own opinion. These operations were high security ones, they should succeed at 100% probabilty; the team can not leave the plane cross thousands of miles without controlling if it is going to the right directon, without any risk of collison with another aircraft, ... No, they should absolutely control teh plane up the vere near their target before leave it make the last straight way by its own as an automated control system requires it to be.
 
mehmetin said:
The explosion patterns are visible, you just need to look them carefully. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFz9TZUyIZk

You can find teh succession of two explosives distant by 3 floors (see slide 51 of my power point) and after that you can find the succession of explosives on every floor. For the sound, as the explosions happened inside the core, between two steel parts, the building acted like silencer to redce the sound; any way the sounds are still audible.
Click to expand...
The rate of expansion is too slow to be an explosive. I hope this is not one of your "main claims".


:o
 
Sideroxylon said:
Originally Posted by mehmetin
According to your comments, my qualifications seems to be higher than yours.

Once again: Are you Turkish or not?

If you had the necessary experience and qualifications to honestly call yourself a scientist I figure you would have simply said so. It's a lie then?
Click to expand...

My qualification is simply writtent in the first slide of my power point! Why sould I repeat it everytime. I told it one time, that's all.

Once again: Are you Turkish or not?
 
2,728 lbs of explosives in a 439' building.

Lets have fun with math!

1,350 (wtc1) +1,350(wtc2) +840(wtc7) = 3,540 total feet.
(We'll disregard the other buildings that collapsed that day)

3,540 / 439 = 8.06

So...
2,728 x 8.06 = 21,987lbs of explosives planted in the 3 towers with nobody noticing.

Okee doke.
Shall I go onto detcord?
 
mehmetin said:
The explosion patterns are visible, you just need to look them carefully. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFz9TZUyIZk

You can find teh succession of two explosives distant by 3 floors (see slide 51 of my power point) and after that you can find the succession of explosives on every floor. For the sound, as the explosions happened inside the core, between two steel parts, the building acted like silencer to redce the sound; any way the sounds are still audible.
Click to expand...

In the video linked on the previous page that you probably didn't watch, Mark Loizeaux points out that buildings surrounding the tower had only facing windows broken by falling debris, and not to others as occurs from a blast.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj6ZtXt6W90
 
mehmetin said:
My qualification is simply writtent in the first slide of my power point! Why sould I repeat it everytime. I told it one time, that's all.

Once again: Are you Turkish or not?
Click to expand...

The first slide of your power point has three lines:

9/11 Strikes
Technical Investigation
Eng. Mehmet

No qualification written anywhere. Did you lie again or am I looking at the wrong power point?
 
Last edited:
GStan said:
Originally Posted by GStan
Apparently, if each guest rings your doorbell within a window of exactly 3 to 9 minutes of the previous doorbell ring, then obviously one person was controlling all of the arrivals. Any other explanation is impossible.

Wow, of all the directions from which your response could have come, I certainly didn't anticipate that one. Just wow dude.:eye-poppi
Click to expand...

May be I missed your meaning, but the regular succession is not as you called it "between previous doorbell". We should change your words as :
if each guest rings your doorbell within a window of exactly 3 to 9 minutes of the end of the lunch of the previous guest, then obviously one person was controlling all of the arrivals according to the end of the lunch of the previous guest. Any other explanation is impossible.

Any way, the example of succession of lunch was good to be considered.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom