• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Muslim researcher explains how 9/11 was made

By "outonomous fly" I mean the aircraft controls it's direction itself without any human intervention. That is like a tomahawk missile that finds its target without external intervention.


Would you mind informing me what triggered the tomahawk guidance system to take over control of the aircraft, and who programmed the guidance system? If what you say is true, why did Flt 93 crash in PA.?

Autonomous systems must have some “human intervention”, or they don’t work.
 
When you need small amount of explosives, you can access empty buildings, can make all kind of holes, study the install places of all explosives, put cables everywhere, there is no need to use radio controlled explosives.

Radio controlled explosives requires longtime preparation, able to place thousands of explosives, possibility of misplacement, it's technologically more expensive. We must consider the radio controlled CDI as the "luxury" of the demolition.
You have no idea what you are talking about. But you amuse me, so please continue.
 
Your english is a little bit complex for me, also true for otehr posts here up.

For what I understand: In the case of four teams, each on board of each plane, the only possible work is a random fly of each plane independently from other. That did not happen! So, this is not consistent with the official claim of four teams.


That's my point. You claim that simultaneous take-off, hijacking, and crashing is not possible if the "official claim" were true. You also claim that staggered take-off, hijacking, and crashing is not possible if the "official claim" were true. Therefore, you must believe that complete randomness is the only possible outcome of events if the "official claim" were true. Anything else is somehow suspicious to you.

Look... We don't gave a damn what you find suspicious. You have done nothing to prove that the actual sequence of events is the result of one team of conspirators hijacking and crashing each plane remotely. All you've done is construct a fantasy that you believe to be a reasonable explanation of the events and tried to beat people into submission with it. That is not proof. You must be aware of this.

You claim the Tomahawk guidance system was used and your only support for this claim is basically that Tomahawk missiles have a guidance system. That's unbelievably stupid and completely unscientific.

You, mehmetin, are diving deeper into some bizarre fantasy world that you've constructed for yourself and I urge you to seek help before you're lost forever.
 
Last edited:
If this guy thinks coordinated attacks aren't possible without a tomahawk guidance system, I think he needs to look into Normandy.

Normandy? Hell, he needs to read up on Artemisium and Thermopylae. The Persians under Xerxes didn't even have the benefit self-propelled vehicles like jeeps and tanks, let alone communications technologies like radio.
 
I know that I am late to this party... but I have a simple question.

Has no one introduced this misguided muslim to the Dawson's Field Hijackings from the 1970s?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawson's_Field_hijackings

4 aircraft were hijacked on the same day by 4 teams of PFLP (muslim!!!!) terrorists (and a 5th one was hijacked 2 days later). Oh wait... it couldn't have been... it must have been da jews.

P.s. I live in the UAE, and have met both of the UAE hijackers families. If they didn't do it, why were their families so sad and very apologetic to me when I met them?
 
Last edited:
Still waiting for you to discuss your 2,000+ planted explosive charges and detonation sequence bollox. Pose...........pause...........ignore........change topic.........no clue. lol.

I explained that, see in the thread, and : Prepared and packed explosives anre introduced into the lifts, and from there they are placed at the required places. Nothing is impossible.
 
Originally Posted by mehmetin
None of your explanations was reasonable. And the question is still open. If you think there is one rasonable, feel free to bring it here, I will study your argument.

In your opinion none of the explanations were reasonable. You see you have to explain WHY they are not reasonable. But you can't because you know they are perfectly reasonable. Just another thing in your LOOOONG list of lies.

Everytime, without a single exception, I explained why your explanations are not reasonable. You just need to look the topic.
 
I'd be surprised if mehmetin could explain how we know he isn't one of the dead hijackers.

Simple for you all: If I had any small relation to any illegal thing, I'd be stopped since long time.

But you should all answer if you were member of or related to those teams who controlled the planes, who prepared the explosives, who installed the explosives in the towers, who triggered the explosives, ... :jaw-dropp
 
Keep it civil, please.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Originally Posted by mehmetin
Everytime, without a single exception, I explained why your explanations are not reasonable. You just need to look the topic.

Correction. You ATTEMPTED to explain why they weren't reasonable. You failed miserably however.

Official story supporters can only DENY, for them everything I tell is meaningless.

Any way, you can continue to tell such baseless and meaningless opinions, you are just telling unsupported opinions. That changes nothing to the facts and I am still waiting your explaination "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

Do not use the words like coincidence, level off, successive take offs; NONE of these claims are reasonable in that case.
- Coincidence is impossible because it's repeated in all 4 cases, regardless take off delays, duration of previous hijacks durations.
- Level off times are not consistent with deviation times, some deviations are before level off, some others are too much later.
- Initial take offs are not planned to be successive, the last flight was delayed too much to make it take off only 4 minutes before the first impact.

In other words, you failed as MISERABLY as Bush Administration to explain "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".
 
Official story supporters can only DENY, for them everything I tell is meaningless.

Any way, you can continue to tell such baseless and meaningless opinions, you are just telling unsupported opinions. That changes nothing to the facts and I am still waiting your explaination "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

Do not use the words like coincidence, level off, successive take offs; NONE of these claims are reasonable in that case.
- Coincidence is impossible because it's repeated in all 4 cases, regardless take off delays, duration of previous hijacks durations.
- Level off times are not consistent with deviation times, some deviations are before level off, some others are too much later.
- Initial take offs are not planned to be successive, the last flight was delayed too much to make it take off only 4 minutes before the first impact.

In other words, you failed as MISERABLY as Bush Administration to explain "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

In other words..........you have failed to explain How and Why your Jews can achieve such things in succession but Muslims can't. Your Jews did it in succession. Your Jews did it in succession. Your Jews did it in succession. The took control and did everything you say cant be done. Your theory happens in succession. You dont see it because your thick.
 
Official story supporters can only DENY, for them everything I tell is meaningless.

Any way, you can continue to tell such baseless and meaningless opinions, you are just telling unsupported opinions. That changes nothing to the facts and I am still waiting your explaination "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

Do not use the words like coincidence, level off, successive take offs; NONE of these claims are reasonable in that case.
- Coincidence is impossible because it's repeated in all 4 cases, regardless take off delays, duration of previous hijacks durations.
- Level off times are not consistent with deviation times, some deviations are before level off, some others are too much later.
- Initial take offs are not planned to be successive, the last flight was delayed too much to make it take off only 4 minutes before the first impact.

In other words, you failed as MISERABLY as Bush Administration to explain "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

It's a shame Muslims aren't smart enough to do such things.
 
Official story supporters can only DENY, for them everything I tell is meaningless.

Any way, you can continue to tell such baseless and meaningless opinions, you are just telling unsupported opinions. That changes nothing to the facts and I am still waiting your explaination "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

Do not use the words like coincidence, level off, successive take offs; NONE of these claims are reasonable in that case.
- Coincidence is impossible because it's repeated in all 4 cases, regardless take off delays, duration of previous hijacks durations.
- Level off times are not consistent with deviation times, some deviations are before level off, some others are too much later.
- Initial take offs are not planned to be successive, the last flight was delayed too much to make it take off only 4 minutes before the first impact.

In other words, you failed as MISERABLY as Bush Administration to explain "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

In other words you still can't explain why our explanations are unreasonable. Meanwhile you have yet to explain why your explanation is reasonable. You still fail. Do you know what a Texas Sharpshooter fallacy is?
 
Last edited:
Official story supporters can only DENY, for them everything I tell is meaningless.

Any way, you can continue to tell such baseless and meaningless opinions, you are just telling unsupported opinions. That changes nothing to the facts and I am still waiting your explaination "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

Do not use the words like coincidence, level off, successive take offs; NONE of these claims are reasonable in that case.
- Coincidence is impossible because it's repeated in all 4 cases, regardless take off delays, duration of previous hijacks durations.
- Level off times are not consistent with deviation times, some deviations are before level off, some others are too much later.
- Initial take offs are not planned to be successive, the last flight was delayed too much to make it take off only 4 minutes before the first impact.

In other words, you failed as MISERABLY as Bush Administration to explain "How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?".

4 different teams plan and execute 4 different successful hijackings on the same day.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawson%...eld_hijackings

4 aircraft were hijacked on the same day by 4 teams of PFLP (muslim!!!!) terrorists (and a 5th one was hijacked 2 days later). Oh wait... it couldn't have been... it must have been da jews.


Try again.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom