Michele Bachmann to run for Prez.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...ploratory-committee-in-june-possibly-earlier/
How about using a degree sign? Like this: M. Bachmann ° You can fill it in when she actually does form the committee.That messes up my dot system, where I induct a candidate upon formation of the committee. Do I wait to dot M. Bachmann in June, or just get it over with?
Pew Research Center. March 8-14, 2011. N=538 Republican and Republican-leaning registered voters nationwide. Margin of error ± 5.5.
"As I name some possible Republican candidates for president in 2012, please tell me which one, if any, you would most like to see nominated as the Republican Party's candidate. [See below.]" If unsure: "As of today, who would you say you LEAN toward?" Options rotated
Mitt Romney 21
Mike Huckabee 20
Sarah Palin 13
Newt Gingrich 11
Ron Paul 8
Tim Pawlenty 3
Mitch Daniels 2
Rick Santorum 2
Haley Barbour 2
Chris Christie (vol.) 2
Other (vol.) 1
None (vol.) 5
Unsure 10
CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. March 11-13, 2011. N=504 Republicans and independents who lean Republican nationwide. Margin of error ± 4.5.
"Next, I'm going to read a list of people who may be running in the Republican primary for president in 2012. After I read all the names, please tell me which candidate you would be most likely to support for the Republican nomination for president in the year 2012, or if you would support someone else. [See below.]" Options rotated
Mike Huckabee 19
Mitt Romney 18
Newt Gingrich 14
Sarah Palin 12
Donald Trump 10
Ron Paul 8
Tim Pawlenty 3
Mitch Daniels 3
Rick Santorum 3
Haley Barbour 1
Someone else (vol.) 4
None/No one (vol.) 3
Unsure 2
In light of Bachmann declaring her intent, when was the last time a representative was nominated from either party?
And Congress>President?
If the last nominee was 1908 you wonder why any Rep bothers.
What a weird election cycle... the "joke" candidates are getting most of the coverage.
In light of Bachmann declaring her intent, when was the last time a representative was nominated from either party?
How about Ford? He went from the House to VP to Pres, and *then* won his party's nomination.
We rank the top 15 GOP contenders using four criteria:
* Money: How much do they have? How much can they raise?
* Campaign infrastructure: Do they have the ability to assemble a competitive and competent staff, both at the national and state levels?
* Strengths: What issue(s) can the candidate truly hang their hat on? Is there a specific area of expertise they can sell to voters? Do they have a strong track record on one particular issue?
* Weaknesses: Every candidate has one -- heck, most candidates have plenty -- and the reality is that eventually they will have to address them. This will be easier for some contenders than others: Explaining away one vote for bad legislation is far easier than justifying a major moral lapse or some fatally flawed executive decision. At the end of the day, some candidates will have weaknesses, and others will have albatrosses. It’s the latter group who should be worried.
Doesn't count. He was the incumbent president. You have to go back to William Jennings Bryan in 1896 for a sitting representative to win the nomination of one of the two major parties. He was re-nominated in 1900, but he was no longer a sitting representative. You have to go back to Lincoln, I think, for one to actually win.