Zanders
Muse
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Messages
- 689
*"This man is dead from a gun shot wound."
"Where's the gun?"
*"We haven't found the gun, yet."
"Then how do you know it was a gun shot?
*"Well we've got this hole, a bullet, and powder burns."
"So, SHOW me the gun."
*"We haven't found it yet."
"THEN HE WASN'T SHOT, NOT WITH A GUN, AT LEAST!"
Nice, you assume that there is actually evidence that a specific kind of device you don't even know exists did it, when there are already good enough explanation being offered. Oh, and there is such thing as something we don't know yet, without assuming it was something that pretty much violates all facts that we know. We know that guns exists, and we know how they work.
If we have no idea how they did it, why speculate that it was something so absurd?
Now, there is no proof of such a thing as this ancient super technology, so there is no reason to assume it existed based on one artifact you don't understand.
Oh, and where is your proof of that ascension I keep asking about? Why are you avoiding answering? And how about some proof that some sort of super technology disappeared with them.
Last edited: