• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who said that? Huh?

Willie Nelson, the great engineer?

Nope, that's not it.

Willie Nelson, the great architect?

Nope, that's not it either......
 
bill smith said:
I knew when Les Robertson said that 'he could not recall' having made a statement that he had seen molten steel under the Towers that he was worried that somebody might have caught him on tape and so he didn't dare to flat-out deny it. Thus the mealy mouth.

He is evidently one of the top Shills as I have said all along and will certainly be arrested come the day. (See Alienentity's signature)
Click to expand...

Is this the quote you refer to in that video?
Quote:
ROBERTSON: We had many engineers on the site of the project following their failure. We and other engineering firms, and yes, there was a red-hot metal, seen by engineers. But molten, molten means flowing. I’ve never run across anyone who said they had in fact seen molten metal, or by the way if they had seen it, that they had performed some sort of analysis to determine what that metal was.
Click to expand...

If so please point out where he does not directly states he saw molten steel rather than what I see as a quite plainly a complete refutiation of the idea of molten metal let alone molten steel.
 
triforcharity said:
Very true. Still one of the greatest musicians of all time IMO.
Click to expand...

On a weather station in the High Arctic islands in late Feb., and one day at noon the sun made its re-appearance for a minute or two for the first time in several months.
Played "Blue Skies" to mark the ocassion.
(oh and by 'played' I mean on a cassette player. Its the only musical instrument I could play well :D )
 
jaydeehess said:
On a weather station in the High Arctic islands in late Feb., and one day at noon the sun made its re-appearance for a minute or two for the first time in several months.
Played "Blue Skies" to mark the ocassion.
(oh and by 'played' I mean on a cassette player. Its the only musical instrument I could play well :D )
Click to expand...

LOL!!!

I can play the radio like nobody's business!! My brother got the musical talents (went to Juilliard) and I went into science. Imagine that.....:D
 
jaydeehess said:
Is this the quote you refer to in that video?


If so please point out where he does not directly states he saw molten steel rather than what I see as a quite plainly a complete refutiation of the idea of molten metal let alone molten steel.
Click to expand...

Well let's wait for this very important video clip to be released into the public domain. Then I assume you will teverse your opinion and see that Les Roberson is an obvious Shill.

Failing that I will be very interested in watching you duck and dive.
 
bill smith said:
I knew when Les Robertson said that 'he could not recall' having made a statement that he had seen molten steel under the Towers that he was worried that somebody might have caught him on tape and so he didn't dare to flat-out deny it. Thus the mealy mouth.

He is evidently one of the top Shills as I have said all along and will certainly be arrested come the day. (See Alienentity's signature)
Click to expand...

bill smith said:
Remember when Les Robertson, chief engineer for the building of the WTC said that he saw molten steel flowing under the Twin Towers ? And a little later he said that 'he could not recall' having made such a statement ? Well finally somebody has come up with the actual video. Great huh ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9EwRm2M1MY&feature=player_embedded
Click to expand...

bill smith said:
The fun part is that we can can now prove that Les lied about what he said. People are sure to want to know why he did that and we are ready willing and able to fill in the blanks for them very very convincingly.

You may think otherwise. You do your thing and we will do ours.
Click to expand...

jaydeehess said:
Is this the quote you refer to in that video?


If so please point out where he does not directly states he saw molten steel rather than what I see as a quite plainly a complete refutiation of the idea of molten metal let alone molten steel.
Click to expand...

bill smith said:
Well let's wait for this very important video clip to be released into the public domain. Then I assume you will teverse your opinion and see that Les Roberson is an obvious Shill.

Failing that I will be very interested in watching you duck and dive.
Click to expand...

Talk about ducking and diving... I asked you a direct question. What quote from Robertson indicates what you say it does? You now seem to be saying that you do not know what the actual quote is. Can I assume then that you are simply believing Gourley and A.Jones without knowing exactly what they are referring to?

ETA: listening now to the clip you linked to.
Filing a lawsuit is less expensive than paying NIST $20,000 ??
My divorce cost me $5000. Gourley works cheap.

Listened to the whole PP episode now. Near the end Gourley suggests that Robertson says he saw a river of molten steel. No direct quote, no video yet available and yet YOU swallow Gourley's description hook line and sinker.
When the video is made public , and hopefully its not edited by Gourley but instead shows the entire interview, and shows that Robertson says nothing of the sort will you then admit it or not , bill?

So far every time I point out how wrong you are you just drop the discussion and attempt to push your errors under the proverbial rug. Will you buck that trend this time , bill?

I expect that it will be the quote above
ROBERTSON: We had many engineers on the site of the project following their failure. We and other engineering firms, and yes, there was a red-hot metal, seen by engineers. But molten, molten means flowing. I’ve never run across anyone who said they had in fact seen molten metal, or by the way if they had seen it, that they had performed some sort of analysis to determine what that metal was.
Click to expand...
 
In a prime example of the 9/11 conspiracists being able to hold to mutually exclusive contentions at the same time, I find these two headlines(links to stories) on 911truthnc

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement
Dr. Ed Ward MD - Mini-nukes at the WTC?
Click to expand...

The first is Harrit's bit of course.

So Gourley is promoting BOTH thermite at WTC and mini-nukes, at the same time!:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Remember when Les Robertson, chief engineer for the building of the WTC said that he saw molten steel flowing under the Twin Towers ? And a little later he said that 'he could not recall' having made such a statement ? Well finally somebody has come up with the actual video. Great huh ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9EwRm2M1MY&feature=player_embedded
Click to expand...

Four days now since A.Jones' interview with Gourley was posted to youtube.

I cannot find the video referred to by Gourley on his site yet. It takes kids in their basement less time to upload a video to youtube. Even if Gourley, as a busy lawyer, does not have time in his day to do it I would think that Jones, with this type of thing being actually what he does for a living, could have done it for Gourley. Surely Jones has an ftp site to which Gourley could post the video and someone at jonmes' office could post it to youtube. It would literally take minutes to accomplish.

Anyways,,,,,,,,,,, bill, you will be sure to post a link when (IF) this video ever does make it to the "public domain", right?
 
Well let's wait for this very important video clip to be released into the public domain. Then I assume you will teverse your opinion and see that Les Roberson is an obvious Shill.

Failing that I will be very interested in watching you duck and dive.
Click to expand...
Bill, will you commit to posting a link to the Robertson interview once Gourley gets around to providing it?

Come on, I double dogs dares ya.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Do you doubt that I will ?
Click to expand...

I wasn't sure but only after prodding you twice did you respond and yet,,, you still have not commited to doing it.

For the record I PROMISE to watch it once its posted. I re-iterate though that what I expect is an un-edited version. If Gourley or Jones cuts it up to suit their own purposes it will only go towards proving the debunker point.
 
jaydeehess said:
In a prime example of the 9/11 conspiracists being able to hold to mutually exclusive contentions at the same time, I find these two headlines(links to stories) on 911truthnc



The first is Harrit's bit of course.

So Gourley is promoting BOTH thermite at WTC and mini-nukes, at the same time!:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Grizzly Bear said:
That's what makes a conspiracy fun!
Click to expand...

That's what it is?

Here I was thinking that it was an example of the 9/11 conspiracists figuratively running around with their heads cut off.
 
I don't see why thermite and mini-nukes are mutually exclusive, they have an equal base in reality and could simply be the result of two different conspiracies, or branches of one.
 
Toke said:
I don't see why thermite and mini-nukes are mutually exclusive, they have an equal base in reality and could simply be the result of two different conspiracies, or branches of one.
Click to expand...

One has to wonder why, if one has a form of thermite that will bring the towers down, one would require a nuclear device also capable of doing the same thing to be installed in the towers as well.(and vice versa)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom