• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
Well I guess you can use the default debunker position for this eventuality. 'I was just having fun with Truthers your honour'.

If the videos were releaseed under the NIST signature they will be hung by by that. Treason is Treason after all.
Click to expand...
NIST did not make the videos. Why do you think Jones said that NIST withheld them? I didn't see any new ones in that video. Wasn't it a FOIA request that got the videos released and not a law suit?


:rolleyes:
 
DGM said:
NIST did not make the videos. Why do you think Jones said that NIST withheld them? I didn't see any new ones in that video. Wasn't it a FOIA request that got the videos released and not a law suit?


:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

If you think so then maybe you better make a case for it.

In the meantime NIST will be convicted of Treason in any fair court for supressing essential 9/11 evidence.
 
bill smith said:
If you think so then maybe you better make a case for it.

In the meantime NIST will be convicted of Treason in any fair court for supressing essential 9/11 evidence.
Click to expand...
There you go again.......... (you really don't like that due process do you?)



:o


ETA I just looked it up, a law suit was indeed filed.
 
bill smith said:
Roseanne Barr, Coleen Rowley and Jon Gold talk 9/11.

http://911truthnews.com/roseanne-barr-for-911-truth-part-2/

http://peaceoftheaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/goldrowleybarr10312010.mp3 audio
Click to expand...

Roseanne is a dope. "I knew 9/11 was an inside job because everything that happens in this world, the US Government is behind" "My first thought when this happened was this is an inside job back to when Reagan was in office because he got rid of the air traffic control unions"
 
"I contend that the big conspiracy is that the CIA is behind the 9/11 truth movement"
"JFK deserved what he got"

This is gold.
 
Crazytimes said:
Roseanne is a dope. "I knew 9/11 was an inside job because everything that happens in this world, the US Government is behind" "My first thought when this happened was this is an inside job back to when Reagan was in office because he got rid of the air traffic control unions"
Click to expand...

Yes, she should have realised that it was Reagen's deregulation of the press in the early 80's that would lead to the Tyranny we see today. Post deregulation the 50-odd competing corparations that ran America's media shrank over time to the five or six easily controllable entities we see today.
 
bill smith said:
Yes, she should have realised that it was Reagen's deregulation of the press in the early 80's that would lead to the Tyranny we see today. Post deregulation the 50-odd competing corparations that ran America's media shrank over time to the five or six easily controllable entities we see today.
Click to expand...

Why don't we just blame the Wright brothers for inventing controlled flight?

:confused:
 
Interesting two year old email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Kevin Barrett. I think both of them are of a kind that the US needs more of, but this argument of respected MIT Professor Chomsky certainly doesn't fly:

Noam Chomsky said:
Some day you might want to learn something about people who really have devoted their lives to activism, and who have given up promising careers and livelihoods to live in poverty and vilification (if they are noticed at all).
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Interesting two year old email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Kevin Barrett. I think both of them are of a kind that the US needs more of, but this argument of respected MIT Professor Chomsky certainly doesn't fly:
Click to expand...
Kevin Barrett may not be mentally ill, but his views on 911 are insane and wrong. We don't need more idiots who can't figure out 911. Kevin can't think rationally (on 911 issues), and he proves it.


It seems self-evident that convincing evidence that 9/11 was a false-flag operation would be by far the strongest imaginable weapon against empire and its crimes; and most of those (virtually all, in fact) who carefully study the evidence presented by the leading figures in the 9/11 truth movement conclude that this evidence is not just convincing, but overwhelming. For a list of names and positions of many of us who have put our reputations and careers on the line for affirming this, see htttp://www.patriotsquestion911.com Your own actions, as a self-professed opponent of empire who is not only not supporting the 9/11 truth movement in its work, but seemingly propagandizing against it, seem exceedingly irrational to a very large and growing number of people. When you ask "How could I believe anything as nutty as that?" (about "it wouldn't matter") the answer is, your position already strikes many of us as just about that nutty.
Click to expand...

His career is on the line because he has moronic claims on 911. When will you and Kevin present the overwhelming evidence.

... Poor Kevin, overwhelming means zero, and evidence is comprised of lies, delusions and hearsay. 9 years of failure.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Well beachnut, we don't need you to tell us what to think. You are in no position to tell us anything of relevance in regards to 9/11. Sorry.
Click to expand...
If Barrett and CIT fool you with 911 insane moronic claims, I can't tell you anything since you filter reality and prefer insane claims, lies and hearsay.

Got some of Barrett's overwhelming evidence? No


This is the paranoid rant of Barrett.
the strength of the evidence that 9/11 was a false-flag operation,
Click to expand...
Did you steal Kevin's evidence? You posted proof Kevin is delusional (on 911) as he rants about evidence and has failed for over 9 years to produce anything. Good job

well, is a hole in the ground, where 911 TM evidence was suppose to be
 
Last edited:
Politics and ideology never actually have a clear cut answer because the definition of "what's right" relies on a person's ideological views. 9/11 truth treaded into scientific fields dealing with physicals, engineering, architecture, biology, chemistry, forensics, fire, and other such investigations whose answers are not as reliant on ideology. Shouldn't be any surprise that if the science part doesn't hold up the politics of the guy isn't going to make much difference in his answer that the truth movement arguments are bat poo crazy...
 
beachnut, i hate those quotewall posts so i try to avoid quoting people i directly respond to, but with habits like yours of post-editing, it gets harder every day. I guess with the arbitrary nature of your posting kit it doesn't matter anyway, but it annoys me. Got style? No.
 
Childlike Empress said:
beachnut, i hate those quotewall posts so i try to avoid quoting people i directly respond to, but with habits like yours of post-editing, it gets harder every day. I guess with the arbitrary nature of your posting kit it doesn't matter anyway, but it annoys me. Got style? No.
Click to expand...

Does this mean you and Barrett lost the overwhelming evidence?

You posted links to idiotic claims made by Barrett, it was a great example of moronic claims based on nothing but lies and fantasy that are typical of the 911 TM. You did a great job finding 911 TM nonsense. Keep up the good work.


Barrett 911 TM BS shot down, debunked by Noam Chomsky...
... matters, and have only rarely come across cases of dismissal even for expressing view that are far more offensive to power interests. Just to take a personal example, I was one of the organizers of resistance during the Vietnam war, and was saved from a probable long prison sentence only because of the Tet offensive, which led the government to cancel the announced trial, in which I was to be the main defendant. But even though MIT was almost entirely funded by the Pentagon, neither I nor others in the lab where I worked -- the main academic center of the resistance movement -- were threatened in any way within the university. I was in fact teaching courses on international affairs, and did not hesitate to express my opinions, which were well known. But I did this (for over 25 years) on my own time, not within the framework of professional responsibilities. http://www.barrettforcongress.us/chomsky.htm
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I suppose I'll be taking a break from this section for a while. I have a rather big project that's ramping up in my studio design course and being that we have an actual client the due date is pretty much absolute. I need to focus my time on that for the next couple of weeks as we have tons of stuff to finish.

I might still be posting in the community section here and there but I need to get away from certain sections that draw my attention more than others :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom