Well not really, because you're doing the thing again where you're countering positions I don't hold and haven't argued. I've got nothing against the majority of the WWII German soldiery. You get called up to fight, you fight.
On an individual level, I can even see mitigating circumstances in units that end up committing war crimes. Does the prison camp guard conspire to help prisoners escape and risk getting shot himself, or does he perpetuate the atrocity, or does he desert and risk being hung?
But none of that is at issue in this case, because the problem is that they don't address this issue. They put the problem at the ideological level, at the party level, and they remove it from the people that they're actually emulating. They don't mention the war crimes, so they don't deal with how the morality plays out.
In fact, as Unaboogie's quote shows, Iott wants to dodge any moral judgements on them. And this is a group that committed warcrimes.
If you've got a historical accuracy fetish down to the authenticity of the belts and canteens you're using, you can expect the lack of mention that their ultra-authentic genuine Mark II Panzerhauser bayonets were used to stab prisoners to death will draw some criticism. Especially when you retreat to moral relativism when questioned.
