CNN "journalist" threatens to shoot census workers

1) Erick Erickson is not a journalist, nor pretends to be one.

Right. He's a dangerous sociopathencouraging other dangerous sociopaths to act out.

2) Erick Erickson's comment was made on his radio show, not CNN.

Whatever. The sociopathic twit said it to at least a few hundred people who are probably as sick as he is.

3) Erick Erickson didn't say anything about "shooting" anyone.

The drooling moron suggests brandishing a weapon. When his kind first brandish a weapon, someone might have a clear reason to expect that the dirtbag means to commit violence, next thing you know the SWAT team is there, which raises the possibility that idiot boy will assume he was right and that he has to go out in a blaze of glory. The least harmful way to employ that sicko's shotgun is as an enema nozzle.

4) Therefore, Erick Erickson's comment has zero to do with how and why the lame stream media is irrefutably liberal.

Had to make a snide comment that has diddly-doo to do with the subject at hand, didn't you?

The left doesn't have anybody that sick.
 
How about this? If any Republicans or Tea-Baggers come to my door looking for a donation, I will have my baseball bat in hand.

its not a threat....I just like baseball.
 
Congress is charged by the Constitution to count heads for the purpose of assigning numbers of representatives to states. Does that mean you have to answer any other question than how many people live there?
 
Congress is charged by the Constitution to count heads for the purpose of assigning numbers of representatives to states. Does that mean you have to answer any other question than how many people live there?

Answer them incorrectly, if it makes you feel better about yourself.
 
Right. He's a dangerous sociopathencouraging other dangerous sociopaths to act out.

Whatever. The sociopathic twit said it to at least a few hundred people who are probably as sick as he is.

The drooling moron suggests brandishing a weapon. When his kind first brandish a weapon, someone might have a clear reason to expect that the dirtbag means to commit violence, next thing you know the SWAT team is there, which raises the possibility that idiot boy will assume he was right and that he has to go out in a blaze of glory. The least harmful way to employ that sicko's shotgun is as an enema nozzle.

My wife hates it when I get drunk before noon. Especially on Easter morning.

Had to make a snide comment that has diddly-doo to do with the subject at hand, didn't you?

The left doesn't have anybody that sick.

Um...

The least harmful way to employ that sicko's shotgun is as an enema nozzle.

Here's looking at you, kid.
 
At the very least, I think we can all agree on this proposed change to the thread's title:

"CNN" "journalist" "threatens" to "shoot" "census workers"


I would write it thus:

CNN contributor encourages radio audience of drooling morons to threaten Census workers with guns.

No scare quotes needed.
 
You obviously have no clue what literally means. Where did he say "shooting?" I understand you know zip about firearms and you have never owned one much less fired one. How does Erickson pulling out his wife's shotgun (he didn't say loaded shotgun or that he pointed it at the geek) when he answers the door turn into "a threat of shooting?" Erickson only says that the twerp would be "scared." So if you understood what "literally" meant, you would have said in the OP "intends to scare" the twerp.

Peephole, it is quite obvious that Erickson meant to threaten census workers by beating them with his shotgun. I mean, that is the primary purpose of a shotgun, right?
 
I think Teabaggers have just argued that the law should be changed for police officers when confronting an armed suspect. If the suspect is waving around his shotgun "just to scare those twerps", it should be unreasonable to assume he means to use it, and police should be prohibited from shooting him.

Well done, Teabaggers. Another heretofore universally understood truism of American life is cast aside in an instant to protect a fellow Tribesman from Liberals.
 
Congress is charged by the Constitution to count heads for the purpose of assigning numbers of representatives to states. Does that mean you have to answer any other question than how many people live there?

No, you don't. So don't answer it, if you don't want.

Of course, given that we are counting people, it is also a convenient time to gather other information about the community that can be useful in terms of planning and providing necessary societal services.

But you go ahead. You can be a stuck-up dick and insist that you only have to give the information required by the constitution. Or you could actually be part of the friggin community and contribute information that can benefit everyone.
 
I would write it thus:

CNN contributor encourages radio audience of drooling morons to threaten Census workers with guns.

No scare quotes needed.

What about Peephole's scare quotes on "Liberal media." Isn't Peephole's OP intended to be an example of how the lame stream media isn't overwhelmingly liberal?

BTW: What was your reaction to Gabriel Range's "Death of a President" which depicts Bush 43's assassination?

"The film was shown to a sell-out crowd at the Toronto Film Festival, who applauded at the end of the screening and several times during a question and answer session with the producers."
 
What about Peephole's scare quotes on "Liberal media." Isn't Peephole's OP intended to be an example of how the lame stream media isn't overwhelmingly liberal?

BTW: What was your reaction to Gabriel Range's "Death of a President" which depicts Bush 43's assassination?

"The film was shown to a sell-out crowd at the Toronto Film Festival, who applauded at the end of the screening and several times during a question and answer session with the producers."


And I thought I was helping you out -- giving you a useful version of the thread title that didn't require scare quotes.

If you have a problem with those other people using scare quotes, don't dump it at my door; go to them. Ingrate. Jeez!
 
Right. He's a dangerous sociopathencouraging other dangerous sociopaths to act out.

Dangerous? Should he be imprisoned?

Whatever. The sociopathic twit said it to at least a few hundred people who are probably as sick as he is.

As opposed to his CNN viewing audience who are sicker?

The drooling moron suggests brandishing a weapon. When his kind first brandish a weapon, someone might have a clear reason to expect that the dirtbag means to commit violence, next thing you know the SWAT team is there, which raises the possibility that idiot boy will assume he was right and that he has to go out in a blaze of glory. The least harmful way to employ that sicko's shotgun is as an enema nozzle.

Now you are advocating Erickson commit suicide?

Had to make a snide comment that has diddly-doo to do with the subject at hand, didn't you?

If the liberal lame stream media has "diddly-doo to do with the subject at hand," why did Peephole only write "liberal media" in his initial post?


The left doesn't have anybody that sick.

Did you intend to pitch this meatball?

KIRO talk host Mike Webb: "Should George Bush get the death penalty? I say yes."


Mike Malloy told listeners he has "violence fantasies" toward White House Spokeswoman Dana Perino. In addition, he has called for physical torture of the "Bush crime family" if they refuse to "tell the truth" about his perceived political grievances.

Mike Malloy Hopes Glenn Beck Comits Suicide On TV

Mike Malloy Wishes "Madness on Palin"; Death on Limbaugh

and for the pièce de résistance:

"A liberal radio talk-show host who aired a comedy skit featuring an apparent gunshot warning to President Bush has apologized, and says she's not afraid of being prosecuted over the matter."

"This was just a stupid, stupid bit!" exclaimed Randi Rhodes on yesterday's broadcast on the Air America network. "But, if it crossed the line, then certainly, there must be punishment, and if there is, I want to be punished so that I can actually say 'Equal justice under law.' Anybody that has stepped over this line of law needs to be prosecuted, including me."
 
I wonder why Cicero has it in for Twoofers, while his Teabagger group welcomes them with open arms? Careful - you won't get your merit badge!
 
WBTW: What was your reaction to Gabriel Range's "Death of a President" which depicts Bush 43's assassination?

"The film was shown to a sell-out crowd at the Toronto Film Festival, who applauded at the end of the screening and several times during a question and answer session with the producers."
Haha, where do you keep getting these strange non-sequiturs?
 

Back
Top Bottom