Ancient Pyramids and other structures, astronomical alignment & similarity.

Robe River... Rogue River...

You want me to believe its just a coincidence? Its obvious there's a connection here. More than one, actually.
 
Correa Neto said:
Robe River... Rogue River...

You want me to believe its just a coincidence? Its obvious there's a connection here. More than one, actually.
Click to expand...


My mistake. Well spotted.


Here are evidents:

RogueRiverTrain.jpg
 
Robe Rogue River is home to two open cut mines, including one at Pannawonica, which means 'place where sky-floating man sleeps' in the local language.
 
Last edited:
Marduk said:
wouldn't they need something to fly into them to appease the enquiring minds of watching termites as to why it collapsed at all?

Awesome, thanks
:D
Click to expand...

And I saw a bunch of ants dancing in the streets when it all went down.
 
Akhenaten said:
.



Julia Creek - Many sightings of the Min Min light

Edward River - Possible dinosaur sightings

Stradbroke Seamount - Mysterious offshore formation, not sighted by Captain Cook DESPITE BEING RIGHT ON TOP OF IT!

Port Fairy - What can I say?

Mungo National Park - Home of the ancestral Yowie

Perth - If you've been there, you don't have to ask

Robe River - Obvious reference to Jeebus' time in Australia between the ages of 12 and 30.



It's just a matter of connecting the dots, people!
Click to expand...
OMG! The arrow points to Easter Island! (+/- a couple of degrees)
 
:big: :clap: Akhenaten wins 9 internets.

ETA: Didn't see the next page with more LOLs. I was responding to Akhenaten's Australian Arrow.
 
Last edited:
What it actually points to is the only way I could fit a nice symmetrical arrow onto a map of Australia.

I only went looking for places with a 'wierd' connection after I drew the arrow.

Just like those 'other' researchers do it, I assume.
 
Akhenaten said:
What it actually points to is the only way I could fit a nice symmetrical arrow onto a map of Australia.

I only went looking for places with a 'wierd' connection after I drew the arrow.

Just like those 'other' researchers do it, I assume.
Click to expand...

A very nice illustration of confirmation bias, thank you.
 
Nope, he's just refusing to ackowledge he is actually connected and one with the universe. This would shatter his worldview, you know.
 
Belz... said:
A very nice illustration of confirmation bias, thank you.
Click to expand...


Correa Neto said:
Nope, he's just refusing to ackowledge he is actually connected and one with the universe. This would shatter his worldview, you know.
Click to expand...


Okay, how to I solve this dilemma?

These are both very nice things to say, but they seem mutually exclusive.

I can see that some kind of duality is going to be needed, or maybe even a trinity. This monotheism is harder than it looks.


ETA:


CoreaNeto4.gif


:)
 
Last edited:
Akhenaten said:
Continental drift might account for that.

Geez. The rabbit hole goes even deeper than I thought.
Click to expand...

Not really, because from Easter Island I can go directly to Mornington Crescent FTW!!
 
Akhenaten said:
I only went looking for places with a 'wierd' connection after I drew the arrow.

Just like those 'other' researchers do it, I assume.
Click to expand...

Actually, I don't think they do. The usual practice is simply to make sure you draw enough connections between places that it's almost impossible not to find a pattern somewhere, and then act all surprised that you found a pattern. Of course, in some cases, like this one, the pattern isn't actually a pattern at all, but just something that looks vaguely like it should be*.

It's very similar to the technique used by alt med. Look at enough variables in enough different ways and you're bound to find a positive correlation between your product and something somewhere. Whether this is due to dishonesty or merely incompetence will vary from case to case, but I think very few people are so dishonest that they'll actually start out with the pattern and then try to fit things to it.

*Actually, this brings up an interesting and, amazingly enough, relevant point. The technique of drawing a picture that almost looks like there might be a pattern and claiming that you've found a pattern is extremely similar to what KotA is doing with his "similar" pyramids. If you look at the actual details, they're not similar at all, but if you just look at the general impression, they're all vaguely the same shape and size and therefore look quite similar. The jump to assuming that there must be some connection between them is exactly the same jump made by Tom Brooks in concluding that some wonky, different sized triangles that don't quite make any kind of pattern must be connected.
 
The similarities between octopus and human eyes indicate a clear connection too. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom