Horatius
NWO Kitty Wrangler
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 29,691
Disappointed, yes. Surprised, no.
One can hope that some fence-sitters will take note of this, and judge Heiwa appropriately.
Top Down Demolition.
- Thread starter Astute Perspicuous
- Start date
Disappointed, yes. Surprised, no.
One can hope that some fence-sitters will take note of this, and judge Heiwa appropriately.
stateofgrace
Unregistered
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 3,843
It would be easy for me to write some sort of light hearted post, or even mickey taking post in response to this but I won't. I am actually glad you have been exposed, again, as the lying fraud you are. It makes me happy that you, a cringe making fool, as no answer other than this and is now nothing but a laughing stock. Your pretend arrogance is laughable and is as significant as you and your false sense of self worth. You have no answer, you never will have because you make crap up in an desperate attempt to gain attention that you do not deserve.
None of your truther pals are rushing to help you, they have abandoned you and I guess they see you as the pathetic fraud you are. You stand alone, the small insignificant loony voice that as now got exactly what it deserves, scorn, mockery and disgust.
You deserve it.
(Am I attacking the arguer? No, I am attacking the entire pathetic argument)
Last edited:
Has anyone alerted the French demo team(s) that they have a claim to Heiwa's million dollars?
Seriously though, this thread makes my head hurt. Some of JREF's best and brightest minds in the fields of engineering, architecture, and physics have repeatedly destroyed Heiwa's over-simplified, mind-numbing idiocy with logic, calculations and theory(actual theory, not bizarro world thruther theory)...they've argued scientifically what 99.99% of the world knows by common sense or common experience.
Fast forward to the present : actual videos of demolitions, which specifically use the very same technique to destroy buildings which Heiwa states is impossible(per his axiom), have been shown to him repeatedly. It's been clarified, with sources, that the larger part has been in no way pre-weakened; so the conditions for the axiom still hold. Yet, there it is...the smaller part destroys the bigger part and we have 6-odd videos showing just that with the verniage technique.
How does Heiwa respond? Congrats the French on their ingenuity and proudly re-affirms his (falsified)axiom. Hence, my headache. Thanks Heiwa, I knew I should have stayed out of the vortex.
Seriously though, this thread makes my head hurt. Some of JREF's best and brightest minds in the fields of engineering, architecture, and physics have repeatedly destroyed Heiwa's over-simplified, mind-numbing idiocy with logic, calculations and theory(actual theory, not bizarro world thruther theory)...they've argued scientifically what 99.99% of the world knows by common sense or common experience.
Fast forward to the present : actual videos of demolitions, which specifically use the very same technique to destroy buildings which Heiwa states is impossible(per his axiom), have been shown to him repeatedly. It's been clarified, with sources, that the larger part has been in no way pre-weakened; so the conditions for the axiom still hold. Yet, there it is...the smaller part destroys the bigger part and we have 6-odd videos showing just that with the verniage technique.
How does Heiwa respond? Congrats the French on their ingenuity and proudly re-affirms his (falsified)axiom. Hence, my headache. Thanks Heiwa, I knew I should have stayed out of the vortex.
Last edited:
Sorry for your trouble. Do you have health insurance?
alienentity
Illuminator
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2009
- Messages
- 4,325
Thank heavens for ignore.
I still think you guys should use this thread, more appropriately titled 'Top Down Collapse - no explosives required' rather than 'demolition'.
The collapse is still gravitational.
I still think you guys should use this thread, more appropriately titled 'Top Down Collapse - no explosives required' rather than 'demolition'.
The collapse is still gravitational.
tsig
a carbon based life-form
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2005
- Messages
- 39,049
Yes. Both CD's and the twin towers were gravitational collapses. The only difference is how the supporting structure was removed.
Justin39640
Illuminator
- Joined
- May 22, 2009
- Messages
- 4,202
the OP in this thread is just too good to let die lol (that must have been embarrassing lol)
Cl1mh4224rd
Philosopher
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2006
- Messages
- 9,778
Or just report them to Universal Law Enforcement. According to Heiwa, they're clearly and recklessly breaking some very fundamental laws.
CHF
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 3,871
Dave Rogers
Bandaged ice that stampedes inexpensively through
Furcifer
Guest
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2007
- Messages
- 13,797
I think he meant symphony.
NutCracker
Muse
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 654
TruthersLie
This space for rent.
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2009
- Messages
- 3,715
I'm sorry you seem to be mistaking your threads.
This thread is about how the verinage technique causes the upper (smaller) portion of the building to crushdown the bottom (larger) part of the building.
IN all of the verinage techniques it is the smaller upper part crushing down the lower larger part.
Are they 1/10th the size? No. But that is not the topic of this thread.
We do have one where you see what appears to be 25% crushing down 75% below it in one of the videos.
are you really going to try to shift shift shift those goalposts? Next you will ask to be shown 100 floors pancaked on top of each other... or maybe just shift to 50...
TruthersLie
This space for rent.
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2009
- Messages
- 3,715
Twin.
He is trying to link these videos to Heiwas failed challenge. Since the challenge is to have a 10% of a building crush down the rest, it is where he is getting his number from.
Of course, the towers weren't crushed down by 10%... much closer to 15%.
Though it is ABSOLUTELY amazing how hard and fast that anders has run from his old statement about how 49% can't crush down 51%. And of course his waterboys ran and hid when these videos came out showing that the smaller part a can crush down the larger part C.
He is trying to link these videos to Heiwas failed challenge. Since the challenge is to have a 10% of a building crush down the rest, it is where he is getting his number from.
Of course, the towers weren't crushed down by 10%... much closer to 15%.
Though it is ABSOLUTELY amazing how hard and fast that anders has run from his old statement about how 49% can't crush down 51%. And of course his waterboys ran and hid when these videos came out showing that the smaller part a can crush down the larger part C.
Edx
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 5,642
Except OOPS theres no explosives involved in that kind of demolition. Somehow still creates puffs of air and lots of dust. Surely thats impossible without explosive superthermites!