It's not a logical fallacy when the expert in question is actually an expert on the subject at hand.really?
Regardless, 'Appeal to authority' is on the list of logical fallacies bc you can find an expert to say anything.
When people seek the truth they are on the same side. I wish more than anything you were correct but I have reality to contend with.
And just like I cannot believe in a loving god just because it is reassuring to do so, I cannot pretend the facts of 9/11 are other than what they are.
"The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is." - Winston Churchill
Misleading. The reality is that Shaler (the man behind the identification project) has access to many remains that he can't identify because of the condition they were in:
The remains are there, there's just no way to tell who's who.![]()
Why don't you look up what "Appeal To Authority Fallacy" is.really?
Regardless, 'Appeal to authority' is on the list of logical fallacies bc you can find an expert to say anything. (ie. Thomas Eager's embarrassment of a paper!
Except the fact that there are dozens of papers, including real peer reviewed paper is respected scientific journals that do this.You can say 'You're just wrong" but you cannot explain observed events with the gravity driven collapse hypothesis; only explosives can do that.
Wait a minute. You claim body parts like that don't exist.As someone who lived through the events in Manhattan, saw the streets littered with body parts and lost two good friends, I find it difficult to fathom where all this hate comes from.
Yet you do pretend that the facts of 9/11 are other than what they do. You believe a religious theologian has more knowledge of structural engineering than an actual structural engineer that helped design the buildings in question. You ignore the obvious, like explosives are loud and would be recorded by 100% of all recording devices in the area.When people seek the truth they are on the same side. I wish more than anything you were correct but I have reality to contend with.
And just like I cannot believe in a loving god just because it is reassuring to do so, I cannot pretend the facts of 9/11 are other than what they are.
right! Why? 10,000 body parts frozen for later study.
as per your statement, 'bc they are so badly damaged.'
by what ?? The gravity driven collapse of this 1,350 foot 'highly redundant' (thomas eager) structure fell with such force it did that ?
(yet left the basements intact.)
I love it when truthers claim there were so much explosives used in the WTC that it pulverized all of the concrete, and even the people.right! Why? 10,000 body parts frozen for later study.
as per your statement, 'bc they are so badly damaged.'
by what ?? The gravity driven collapse of this 1,350 foot 'highly redundant' (thomas eager) structure fell with such force it did that ?
(yet left the basements intact.)

Yeah, who would ever have thought that a building collapse could ever harm the human body.![]()
ROFLMAO. Hey twoof. Look up "appeal to authority" logical fallacy. It is when you have NO authority but try to pass it off that it becomes the "appeal to authority." When in fact there is AUTHORITY (you know like the real science about what happened) it is no longer a logical fallacy. It is called proof, support and evidence. Nice try though. Handwave coming in 3...really?
Regardless, 'Appeal to authority' is on the list of logical fallacies bc you can find an expert to say anything. (ie. Thomas Eager's embarrassment of a paper!
You can say 'You're just wrong" but you cannot explain observed events with the gravity driven collapse hypothesis; only explosives can do that.
and the vast majority comes from twoofs... it is rather amazing really.I see a lot of personal incredulity here in this forum, not to mention name calling, intolerance and just plain ignorance -
I call BS, but maybe you really are from manhattan.. though I seriously doubt it.As someone who lived through the events in Manhattan, saw the streets littered with body parts and lost two good friends, I find it difficult to fathom where all this hate comes from.
When people seek the truth they are on the same side. I wish more than anything you were correct but I have reality to contend with.
And just like I cannot believe in a loving god just because it is reassuring to do so, I cannot pretend the facts of 9/11 are other than what they are.
"The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is." - Winston Churchill
right! Why? 10,000 body parts frozen for later study.
as per your statement, 'bc they are so badly damaged.'
by what ?? The gravity driven collapse of this 1,350 foot 'highly redundant' (thomas eager) structure fell with such force it did that ?
(yet left the basements intact.)
No blast injuries, no shrapnel injuries... yet these magical tools launched panels several tones over 600 ft! Troofer logic can truly astound!I love it when truthers claim there were so much explosives used in the WTC that it pulverized all of the concrete, and even the people.
And somehow no sound of such an incredible amount of explosives is audible on any recording device used that day, nor were windows blown out by the shock wave, nor was debris blasted miles around.
Quick atavism, switch to therm*te mode!
![]()
OH twoof. It helps if you had any idea of biology, physics or chemistry.
Why would they freeze 10,000 body parts that are too badly damaged or decomposed to id? because with technology advancing at the rate it does, hopefully in a few year, they will be able to identify those parts.
Now back to this point about unidentified body parts. How many thousands of tons were dropped on those bodies? Huh? Lets just say a muther ****ing ********.
now how long were those body parts in the piles twoof? Some of them up to 3 months. How long does a human body take to start decomposing? (the answer is almost immediately bacteria attacks the tissue). So 3 months, in small pieces in a HOT PILE full of fires...
It is amazing that they RECOVERED ANY body parts that were identifable.
What part of that do you not understand?
No way, man. I'm a No-Mothra believer. There is no evidence of any Mothra at any of the scenes. You're an NWO Mothra-shill!
You radical amothrists are relying on faith just as much as the Mothra-huggers!
A reasonable amothrist would simply have no belief in Mothra, rather than actively promoting "No Belief in Mothra". As we cannot know for sure if Mothra exists or not, the only sensible position is Mothratic Agnosticism.
The damage was to the DNA, by the conditions in the pile, as it said in the paragraph I quoted.right! Why? 10,000 body parts frozen for later study.
as per your statement, 'bc they are so badly damaged.'
by what ?? The gravity driven collapse of this 1,350 foot 'highly redundant' (thomas eager) structure fell with such force it did that ?
(yet left the basements intact.)
Please provide a list of witnesses and on-site investigators who believe explosives were used to bring down any of the WTC buidlings on 9/11.