No Explosives Here?

[leftysergeant]

I thank you for your service to our country.
I appreciate your comment and sincerely wish you were correct but the facts indicate otherwise. Remember, an 'expert' can be found to say anything. This is why 'appeal to authority' is a logical fallacy. Unless you can explain the features of these events that so overwhelmingly point to explosives, then you are not going to convince many people.

Here are a whole slew of experts who disagree with you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ

They are not experts in the relevant areas, nor do they show us any actual evidence. They mistook a lot of irrelevant stuff for evidence, but that may be because some of them are mentally ill.

Personally, I dont need any of their testimony to be 100% certain that wtc 1 2 and 7 were destroyed with preplanted explosives, -the data (facts on the ground, not to mention the reaction of the bush administration) provide far more than evidence than is necessary to be sure this was the case.

This indicates faulty reasoning skills on your part. That Bush the Lesser and his merry morons were unfit for their jobs does not mean that they could have arranged such a vast operation as this so flawlessly.

Quite the contrary, actually.