• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread WTC7 is a problem for the 9/11 official story

You're asking me to prove that I was an eyewitness?? I cannot do that without revealing my identity, and I will not do it. Sorry, we have been through this before.

I can tell you pretty much anything you would like. I believe I have gone into detail about this before, and do not have a problem doing it again. Feel free to ask me whatever you like, and try to discredit it.
 
triforcharity said:
You're asking me to prove that I was an eyewitness?? I cannot do that without revealing my identity, and I will not do it.
Click to expand...

That's cause you're the :rule10ing Harley Guy, aren't you??? I :rule10ing knew it, you're the god :rule10ed Harley Guy. Oh HAPPY :rule10ing Day now that we have all that :rule10 cleared up.
 
I don't ride that kind of bike. I prefer the manually operated type. But, that would be the logic of most twoofers.
 
Dog Town said:
Do you have any idea, when the SEC began investigating,AA & ENRON? When they began taking documents from the AA & ENRON offices? You know, the stuff they would use against them! Didn't think so!

Also why would any info gathered be in NY? Hard copies would be in Texas, at a Field office set up for this type situation!
Click to expand...


Bill doing a cricket! SURPRISE (repeat chorus)!
 
RedIbis said:
I'm familiar with the reports of a bulge in WTC 7. I was speaking more to your eyewitness testimony.
Click to expand...

Why did you say "claims" then? Plural?

Do you agree there were huge roaring fires in the WTC7? And a huge bulge in the building?

Do you agree there were many firefighters and engineers who thought the building would fall?
 
It doesn't make difference if you don't believe somebody on an internet forum, truthers. No rational person can deny that there were many observers at the scene, firemen and engineers, who reported major fires and a bulge in the building and were concerned that it could collapse at any time. Claim they were "in on it", claim they were just following orders blindly and didn't really think it was going to collapse, flap your hands all you want truthers, but you can't claim they weren't there.
 
funk de fino said:
Why did you say "claims" then? Plural?

Do you agree there were huge roaring fires in the WTC7? And a huge bulge in the building?

Do you agree there were many firefighters and engineers who thought the building would fall?
Click to expand...

Sorry there Funk. I'm not hopping on that carousel again. Even I have my limits as to how many times I repeat and post the same information.
 
RedIbis said:
Please don't bump your non-sequitors. To illustrate, I said this:

And somehow you ended up with this:



Which makes zero sense.
Click to expand...

No instead of ANSWERING THE SIMPLE FREAKING question, you have tried to again impinge upon the good name of a fellow Jrefer (who you have accused of lying w/out proof) and tried to dodge around yet again.

We already know what YOUR word is worth by your actions and deeds, so stop the handwaving and underhanded attempts to call someone a LIAR, when the ONLY PROVEN liar in this thread is YOU.
 
TruthersLie said:
No instead of ANSWERING THE SIMPLE FREAKING question, you have tried to again impinge upon the good name of a fellow Jrefer (who you have accused of lying w/out proof) and tried to dodge around yet again.

We already know what YOUR word is worth by your actions and deeds, so stop the handwaving and underhanded attempts to call someone a LIAR, when the ONLY PROVEN liar in this thread is YOU.
Click to expand...

The word you're looking for is impugn, not impinge. Weren't you the guy who was criticize my language skills?
 
RedIbis said:
The word you're looking for is impugn, not impinge. Weren't you the guy who was criticize my language skills?
Click to expand...
Will you continue dodging, or is this your cue to fly away again?

You really have no clue how intellectually bankrupt you appear, do you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom