Split Thread WTC7 is a problem for the 9/11 official story

[jaydeehess]

If you are 'keeping score' you obviously see it as a game yourself. Pot, meet kettle.

English isn't your first language? I will explain;
I was opining that YOU are considering this a game, not me.

 

[jaydeehess]

Let's say I have this tapestry laid out before me and I'm just cutting off the annoying loose threads.

To you people who have made it a mission to defend the official theory, all this might be very frustrating, but you are not compelled to respond to my posts.

I do, and have for over a decade, starting with the Apollo Hoax nonsense, challenged ignorance that is paraded about as information.

911 conspiracies are no different in that regard. I cannot abide anyone who tries to push ignorance. You have been doing so since you arrived and thus I respond to your posts. Are we clear on that now?

I asked you before I believe, why do you feel that the 911 conspiracy theorists should get carte blanche and not be challenged when they are wrong. I received no response.

 

[jaydeehess]

Has this link been ripped apart yet?

http://911review.com/articles/ryan/nist_thermite_connection.html

I assume you are as capable of using the search function here as anyone else is. Are you asking for help to find posts concerning Kevin Ryan's opion piece?

 

[TheBigKahuna]

Originally Posted by BigAl
How would anything set in the core on the impact floors survive the fire?

How does a plane's black box survive a fire? Are you saying it is impossible to conceive of a device that would allow a steady amount of thermi-stuff out onto the structure it was secured to?

Any device that indestructible would have been found in the rubble, don't ya think?

Originally Posted by BigAl
Anything anywhere else would cause the tower to collapse in a way that is different from what we all saw and is remembered on audio and video.

Which is what I am asking you to describe. How would it be different?

Well, you could blow one side of the building, put a big rocket engine on the top, and get it to fall over like a Xmas tree. I don't remember seeing that, however.

Originally Posted by BigAl
There were no man-made demolition explosions at WTC.

Never said there were.

Thermite has been shown not to melt columns, and now there's no demo explosions. Kinda means chucking controlled demo out the widow, doesn't it?

Originally Posted by BigAl
Nobody knows how to use therm-anything to demolish large steel beams in any way useful to make a WTC tower collapse as it did.

And you know this, how?

Because if it were known, the truth movement would have posted that video to utube as the new "smoking gun."

 

[TheBigKahuna]

I find Ragnarok a bit hard to pin down on any specific claim/story.

If he really belived in any story why does he not stick to it?

If you stick to a theory it's pretty readily hammered into dust. If you keep it vague then there's no evidence to the contrary.

 

[aggle-rithm]

Are you saying it is impossible to conceive of a device that would allow a steady amount of thermi-stuff out onto the structure it was secured to?

There was just such a device used in a test on the recent National Geographic Channel special about 9/11 conspiracy theories...and it DID survive the thermite ignition! But then, so did the column it was supposed to cut through.

 

[aggle-rithm]

If you stick to a theory it's pretty readily hammered into dust. If you keep it vague then there's no evidence to the contrary.

Also, if your "evidence" isn't tied to any specific conclusion (other than "the gubmint didit") then you don't have to worry about internal consitency. You could have evidence that supports five different theories that are mutually exclusive, and still say that the evidence is "overwhelming" because you never say what those theories are.

 

[Toke]

Well ok, the vauge approach just appear so ridicilous.
I guess it is neccecary if you just want to be "Against"

 

[dafydd]

What's shocking and awing is the sheer stupidity of your theories.

How can one person be so stupid,you'd think that it would take a committee.