• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Split Thread WTC7 is a problem for the 9/11 official story

bill smith said:
No problem. We only have this guys word for this, Apart from that I can believe that the electronic data would mostly have been on other computers but perhaps not some of the hard socumentation. They could 'lose' any critical document they liked after a mess like this.
Click to expand...

Do you have any idea, when the SEC began investigating,AA & ENRON? When they began taking documents from the AA & ENRON offices? You know, the stuff they would use against them! Didn't think so!

Also why would any info gathered be in NY? Hard copies would be in Texas, at a Field office set up for this type situation!
 
Last edited:
Caustic Logic said:
Why don't they hire people with faces?
Click to expand...

The EEOC demands that they be allowed to get work too. There would be faceless uprisings, massive faceless lawsuits, faceless protests because their ability to work is protected under the americans with faceless disabilities act.

So don't be hatin because they have the kool jobs.
 
bill smith said:
I realise that this is a very difficult question for you to answer, but when you were a Truther did you think that WTC7 looked like a Controlled Demolition ?
Click to expand...

Is that a trick question, Bill? What it looks like does not affirm what it is. What would be the next step on the road to discovery?
 
oldhat said:
How come 9/11 Truthers haven't been murdered/silenced/jailed/deported etc. for telling the Truth, bill?

If what you say is true about how fearful the government and powers-that-be are about this stuff getting out, how come you and your compatriots are still there and tapping away on your keyboards, holding meetings, calling into radio show and so on? People like Jason Bermas have made quite a lucrative career out of it. Why aren't the IRS or FBI dragging them away in the night?
Click to expand...
Back in the earlies I asked an old grizzled Truther whether he thought it wasdangerous to be posting the Truth in the face of evil. This is what he said;-

''...very dangerous, powerful and resourceful people, to say the least. But don't worry. They are very busy watchiing each other and hangers-on for whistle blowers with real knowledge. If you are on that list, you have had it.
Luckily we are not on that list! But they don't like us, that's for sure. Normal caution is recommended ''
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Does WTC7 resemble the controlled demolition shown in the video below ? If not, what significant differences do you see ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo
Click to expand...

For one, collapse started eight seconds before the video starts timing. And the idiots who made it labeled corner damage as squibs -- there were none. Oh and did I forget? One was on fire for seven hours without any active fire protection running because a skyscraper nearby collapsed destorying the city's infrastructure?

RedIbis said:
Nope. I'd ask you for support for your claims, but I think I know how that would go.
Click to expand...
Seeing as you've failed thus far after 10 months to answer to your hypocrisy, your opinion is bluntly worthless and a waste of air.

bill smith said:
Where did you se these 'huge roaring fires' ?Which side of WTC7 ?
Click to expand...
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4958874#post4958874

Turbulent smoke flow and high volume is a sign of major fire underway. The mechanism for the velocity of the smoke evacuating the building at that rate is heat.
 
bill smith said:
Back in the earlies I asked an od grizzled Truther whether he thought it wasdangerous to be posting the Truth in the face of evil. This is what he said;-

''...very dangerous, powerful and resourceful people, to say the least. But don't worry. They are very busy watchiing each other and hangers-on for whistle blowers with real knowledge. If you are on that list, you have had it.
Luckily we are not on that list! But they don't like us, that's for sure. Normal caution is recommended ''
Click to expand...
Well that explains why all "truthers" are safe. "No real knowledge". You said it.
 
Last edited:
MIKILLINI said:
Is that a trick question, Bill? What it looks like does not affirm what it is. What would be the next step on the road to discovery?
Click to expand...

Pretend tou are him- a reformed Truther. Then try to answr the question without opening yourself up to a host of problems.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Pretend tou are him- a reformed Truther. Then try to answr the question ithout opening yourself up to a host of problems.
Click to expand...

the host of problems come in where somewhere deep in your mind you think it looks like one thing, but every single other characteristic of what it resembles is completely missing. The evidence of demolition just never came in.
 
Grizzly Bear said:
the host of problems come in where somewhere deep in your mind you think it looks like one thing, but every single other characteristic of what it resembles is completely missing. The evidence of demolition just never came in.
Click to expand...

Do you want to play the game as outlined ?
 
bill smith said:
It wasn't unknown to Enron pr Worldcom or the SEC who were investigating the 63 billion dollar Enron fraud in California and the Worldcom scandal amongst several others. Apparently those investigations were extremely hampered by the loss of so many original documents.
Click to expand...

Wow, you are following teh twoofer line verbatim. In the midst of extreme measures taken to destroy documents, there was quite a bit of fire in WTC 7.
I suppose these people were not convinced fire could destroy documents, so they had to use explosives for assurance?
 
Grizzly Bear said:
the host of problems come in where somewhere deep in your mind you think it looks like one thing, but every single other characteristic of what it resembles is completely missing. The evidence of demolition just never came in.
Click to expand...
Has he actually said what these "host of problems" would be?

I have yet to see a "problem" that a "truther" found that couldn't be solved by dropping the speculation and paranoia.

You think he can prove me wrong?
 
bill smith said:
Back in the earlies I asked an old grizzled Truther whether he thought it wasdangerous to be posting the Truth in the face of evil. This is what he said;-

''...very dangerous, powerful and resourceful people, to say the least. But don't worry. They are very busy watchiing each other and hangers-on for whistle blowers with real knowledge. If you are on that list, you have had it.
Luckily we are not on that list! But they don't like us, that's for sure. Normal caution is recommended ''
Click to expand...

:dl: Congratulations Bill! You've accepted Hook, line and sinker.
 
RedIbis said:
I'm sorry, what? I yawned and then took a sip of Guinness.
Click to expand...
Wow, that anger you feel over your government murdering thousands of its own citizens in order to launch a war of imperial world domination that has killed thousands more must really be burning you up inside to make you so bored and listless!

Oh wait, maybe you don't actually believe this nonsense after all and are just trolling. :rolleyes:
 
bill smith said:
Justin, under current American Law you can be snatched from your bed this very night at 5am on the orders of some faceless person in some government department. our family will be gagged. Unable to speak of it under penalty of the law. You can be imprisoned forever and waternoarded 180 times in a single month, lust like KSM because you fall under he exact same law if they call you an 'enemy combatant'.
You guys should really check this stuff out in yur own personal interest.
Click to expand...


You know who else can terminate all my rights with no warning? A terrorist. With no orders or paperwork or vast prison system required. Just a bomb in a vehicle or building I happen to be walking past. And then... boom! No more rights. Can't speak freely because my jaw isn't attached to my skull any more. Can't freely assemble because my legs are nowhere to be found. Can't keep and bear arms because mine don't work any more. Can't tell the Army not to quarter troops in my house because I'm dead.

Of course, lots of other things can do that to me too. A drunk driver. A trigger-happy mugger. A virus, most likely one whose lineage has never ever passed through a government lab. A bolt of lightning. A careless moment the next time I'm doing some home wiring. The slight headache I've had since this morning, that could turn out to be an inoperable brain tumor.

Your scenario of a 5am government snatching is about number 1,375 on my list of terrible possible things to worry about. Much less worrisome than, for example, the magnificent tall trees in my back yard that could crush half my house and me with it, right in my bed or here at my desk, if blown over in the wrong direction by a wind storm.

Of all the things in the world that can disrupt your life, hurt you, or kill you, why does that particular one loom so large in your thinking? What do you believe the probability of it happening to you is, per year?

Ever heard of atherosclerosis? You should really check it out, in yur own personal interest.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom