• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

Please re - read post 152. You asked for proof of parts, i directed you to search for them. .


Please be an adult for once. As stated the onus is on you to show proof of what you state.

I can show proof of what i post, why can't you?
 
What's with all the obstruction here? The man wants serial numbers, why not give him serial numbers?

Here you go:

00000001
00000002
00000003
00000004
00000005
00000006
00000007
00000008
00000009
00000010
00000011
00000012
00000013
00000014
00000015
00000016
00000017
00000018
00000019
00000020
00000021
00000022
00000023
00000024
00000025
00000026
00000027
00000028
00000029
00000030
00000031
00000032

You can use these to number any plane parts you happen to have around. (They're also useful for checks, invoices, limited editions, prescriptions, and clones.) Let me know if you need more. I've got way more than I need.

Respectfully,
Myriad

Dibs on 00000031!
 
Please be an adult for once. As stated the onus is on you to show proof of what you state.

I can show proof of what i post, why can't you?

You show no proof U1. Never have done and never will. You show delusion and BS.

You asked for proof of parts. As have others and so it will continue i'm sure.
Each time of asking proof has been shown. This site is full to the brim of all you request. The internet is full to the brim of all you request.

The truth is U1 - you are simply a source of ammusement or irritation for many. We no longer need Gravy when we have U1 to convince us that the official story is the truth!
 
Have you actually worked on a plane?

I have, so i know about serial numbers too and what parts are numbered and where.

I have shown the requlation that covers NTSB working at crime scenes.
Why are serial numbers needed for 911?

Why? Can you show me the regulation and source?
 
Why are serial numbers needed for 911?

As part of the criminal investigation to verify the planes, as is done with most investigations done by the NTSB when they do a reconstruction.

Why? Can you show me the regulation and source?

Already shown.

http://www.ntsb.gov/Abt_NTSB/invest.htm
In cases of suspected criminal activity, other agencies may participate in the investigation. The Safety Board does not investigate criminal activity; in the past, once it has been established that a transportation tragedy is, in fact, a criminal act, the FBI becomes the lead federal investigative body, with the NTSB providing any requested support.
 
Last edited:
I see a couple photos (with no sources), showing a wheel not the "plenty" of parts that you keep talking about and no actual proof or reports that the parts shown are from AA77.


Dare to try something new. Read the article.
 

And also this

None of this is the kind of pedantic ninth-grade-geometry-class proof that CTers commonly whine for, but the fact that pieces of aircraft debris photographed on the scene, when carefully compared to photos of existing planes and the manufacturer's tech manuals, turn out to be consistent with
items expected to be on a 757 adds to the heap of evidence.

That kind of evidence is like a swarm of ants- one bit is like one ant- no threat to anything, but just turn loose the entire swarm and the next thing you know your CT has been eaten away to a few bones.
 
Dare to try something new. Read the article.

And also this

None of this is the kind of pedantic ninth-grade-geometry-class proof that CTers commonly whine for, but the fact that pieces of aircraft debris photographed on the scene, when carefully compared to photos of existing planes and the manufacturer's tech manuals, turn out to be consistent with
items expected to be on a 757 adds to the heap of evidence.

That kind of evidence is like a swarm of ants- one bit is like one ant- no threat to anything, but just turn loose the entire swarm and the next thing you know your CT has been eaten away to a few bones.

The fact is it has no real facts, evidence, or reports that the wheel or any or other parts found match AA77.
 
Last edited:
And also this

None of this is the kind of pedantic ninth-grade-geometry-class proof that CTers commonly whine for, but the fact that pieces of aircraft debris photographed on the scene, when carefully compared to photos of existing planes and the manufacturer's tech manuals, turn out to be consistent with
items expected to be on a 757 adds to the heap of evidence.

That kind of evidence is like a swarm of ants- one bit is like one ant- no threat to anything, but just turn loose the entire swarm and the next thing you know your CT has been eaten away to a few bones.

And little do the CTers realise that the very parts/serial numbers that they whine about actually confirm the aircraft to be the type hijacked etc. Any aircraft manufacturing personnel will immediately determine any given aircraft part from specific locations - Why? Because they spend 8 hours per day sourcing, preparing, fitting, testing and recording those very parts. That specific part can then be traced permanantly to the person who fitted it. Spotting aircraft parts in twoofers photos is easy - except to a twoofer who doesnt want to find it!

Twoofers live in basements and fail their physics exams so can hardly be expected to know how an aircraft is built, let alone what parts look like.
 
The fact is it has no real facts, evidence, or reports that the wheel or any or other parts found match AA77.
The FDR matches 77! Your delusion means you can't comprehend 911 evidence.

Got some evidence? No, you have the lies, hearsay, and fantasies of 911Truth.

Explain and source why we need serial numbers.
Produce the regulation stating clearly why serial numbers are needed.
 
Last edited:
The fact is it has no real facts, evidence, or reports that the wheel or any or other parts found match AA77.


But AA Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and the parts are those of a Boeing 757. Do you read your own posts? What possesses you to continue marching along this strange path? Do you think that maybe a different 757 was involved? What on earth are you claiming?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom