Heliport tower ATC Sean Boger: ultimate validation of the north side approach

[Mr.Herbert]

Interesting that TLB was able to confirm his identity. Has anyone ever heard of uterine cannibalism?

 

[chillzero]

That's enough, everyone. Re-read your membership agreement. Please pay particular attention to Rules 11 and 12. It doesn't matter about anybody's suspicions about any member, if they have no proof. Do not allow yourselves to have your ability to hold a sensible, on topic discussion be destroyed by your bias against a particular group of people.

Deal with the posts. Deal with the evidence and the facts. Stop speculating about people as soon as they mention they support CIT, and stop derailing threads and making personal attacks against those people.

Report any evidence you have about socks to the mod team, and until - UNTIL - the admins ban someone as a sock, you should treat them as a standard member, and keep your posts civil, and on topic.

Any issues with this mod box - take them to the Forum Management section.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

 

[jhunter1163]

Thank you, ma'am! May I have another?

 

[Mr.Herbert]

So, CIT was able to validate that Sean Bolger saw the plane fly into the Pentagon.

Thread closed.

CIT - Done

 

[dtugg]

So, CIT was able to validate that Sean Bolger saw the plane fly into the Pentagon.

Thread closed.

CIT - Done

I agree. TLB even said himself that Boger hit the deck as the plane hit.

 

[TheLoneBedouin]

Center for Military History material was released via a FOIA request in 2008, which led CIT to a conclusion that some of this material corroborated the NOC flight path.

Wrong.

CMH released transcripts and audio recordings from witnesses who CIT would video record on location specifically placing the plane in a right bank on the northern approach just as described by heliport tower ATC Sean Boger in the exclusive interview presented in the OP.

Did you bother to listen to it?

Anti-Semitic Dick Eastman did his own "research" back in 2003.

He was the first researcher to talk to any witnesses direct (via email) and uncovered the fact that Sgt Lagasse was on the "starboard" side of the craft revealing the first piece confirmed direct of evidence for NoC.

National Geographic released some animation or photos in 2004, which in 2008 led CIT to conclude that they had confirmed the NOC flight path already 4 years earlier.

You coincidence theorists are amazing.

Respected professional journalists worked on a world historical piece and created animations that almost perfectly represents three important (and fatal) aspects of the flight path as reported by CIT. East of the river, over the Navy Annex, and north of the citgo.

In 2006 CIT did their first interviews.

All first-hand eyewitness evidence from the people in this most critical area to determine the location of the plane at this final moment unanimously agree on a northern approach.

Not a single first-hand account exists to refute them.

So not-exciting.

If you support permanent war, the slaughter of 10's of thousands of innocent people, and 100's of billions of dollas of defense and rebuilding contracts issued based solely on a lie I could see where it wouldn't be.

Did you know that heliport tower ATC Sean Boger corroborates all the other witnesses regarding a north side approach?

 

[TheLoneBedouin]

However I would have to dig out my tape of the episode out of my towers of unlabeled tapes to be sure.

Yeah, why don't you go ahead and do that and report back what your diligent research discovers about this in the National Geographic thread.

This will be great.

In the mean time did you know that heliport tower ATC Sean Boger saw the plane in a right bank on the north side of the citgo exactly like all the other witnesses?

 

[funk de fino]

Did you know that heliport tower ATC Sean Boger corroborates all the other witnesses regarding a north side approach?

yet, you said he ducked when it hit the pentagon?

Are you calling him a liar when he says he saw it hit and then he ducked?

 

[dtugg]

There has already been one warning to stay on topic here. Going off topic after such a recent warning is not taken lightly by the mods. Please try to restrain your unfocused exuberance.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky

 

[TheLoneBedouin]

yet, you said he ducked when it hit the pentagon?

Are you calling him a liar when he says he saw it hit and then he ducked?

Typo- I meant "as he thought it hit the Pentagon".

If you didn't realize it yet, the plane cannot have approached from the North, banked right, flown at above 1st floor level, and still hit the Pentagon.

 

[The Big Dog]

Wrong.

CMH released transcripts and audio recordings from witnesses who CIT would video record on location specifically placing the plane in a right bank on the northern approach just as described by heliport tower ATC Sean Boger in the exclusive interview presented in the OP.

Did you bother to listen to it?



He was the first researcher to talk to any witnesses direct (via email) and uncovered the fact that Sgt Lagasse was on the "starboard" side of the craft revealing the first piece confirmed direct of evidence for NoC.



You coincidence theorists are amazing.

Respected professional journalists worked on a world historical piece and created animations that almost perfectly represents three important (and fatal) aspects of the flight path as reported by CIT. East of the river, over the Navy Annex, and north of the citgo.



All first-hand eyewitness evidence from the people in this most critical area to determine the location of the plane at this final moment unanimously agree on a northern approach.

Not a single first-hand account exists to refute them.



If you support permanent war, the slaughter of 10's of thousands of innocent people, and 100's of billions of dollas of defense and rebuilding contracts issued based solely on a lie I could see where it wouldn't be.

Did you know that heliport tower ATC Sean Boger corroborates all the other witnesses regarding a north side approach?

YAWN:

"Although Sean has also claimed that he watched the plane go into the building we know this is impossible since he saw it on the north side. He says he hit the deck so logic would dictate that he did this as the plane hit and deduced the impact considering all other witnesses corroborate his north side claim."

Why are we still talking about this, TLB?

 

[funk de fino]

Typo- I meant "as he thought it hit the Pentagon".

If you didn't realize it yet, the plane cannot have approached from the North, banked right, flown at above 1st floor level, and still hit the Pentagon.

So, when he said he saw it hit the Pentagon he was lying?

I know more about aircraft than you and I know your claims are junk.

 

[dtugg]

Typo- I meant "as he thought it hit the Pentagon".

Too bad for you he said back in 2001 that he watched the plane hit. Craig couldn't talk him out of that, could he? We don't care if you think that he only thought that it hit.

If you didn't realize it yet, the plane cannot have approached from the North, banked right, flown at above 1st floor level, and still hit the Pentagon.

Correct. That is why any witnesses that say it flew NoC are incorrect. The physical evidence proves it. Frankly, the path any witnesses gave a couple of fraudulent, delusional, idiotic jackasses years after the fact is of no importance. Especially since they all say it hit the Pentagon.

How's the enemies list going?

 

[The Big Dog]

If you didn't realize it yet, the plane cannot have approached from the North, banked right, flown at above 1st floor level, and still hit the Pentagon.

Hey TLB, the bold part above made me laugh, you are a funny guy! You hear folks, a plane coming directly into the Pentagon at 400 knots at first floor level could not have hit the Pentagon!

Giggle, freaking No Planers! Hilarious.

"Although Sean has also claimed that he watched the plane go into the building we know this is impossible since he saw it on the north side. He says he hit the deck so logic would dictate that he did this as the plane hit."

 

[1337m4n]

Boger saw the plane impact the Pentagon: Yes or no?

 

[Shalamar]

Errrr.

So witnesses that saw the plane impact the pentagon are 'Mistaken, or do not recall properly'

But witnesses who see the NOC path are 'irrefutable eyewitnesses who prove that the plane flew NOC, did not hit the pentagon, and did a flyover?'

Even if witnesses say NOC AND it flew directly into the pentagon?

Do I have this right?

 

[A W Smith]

TLB you have multiple corroborative witnesses that unanimously agree that the plane flew into the pentagon. To dispute this is a case of special pleading and is a logical fallacy.

 

[dtugg]

Errrr.

So witnesses that saw the plane impact the pentagon are 'Mistaken, or do not recall properly'

But witnesses who see the NOC path are 'irrefutable eyewitnesses who prove that the plane flew NOC, did not hit the pentagon, and did a flyover?'

Even if witnesses say NOC AND it flew directly into the pentagon?

Do I have this right?

Pretty much. All they have is small number of witnesses that say it flew NoC (and into the Pentagon) years later. They are a complete joke even in a "movement" that is a complete joke.

They haven't even published all the interviews that they have. Craig says he interviewed dozens of people. Somehow only ones that they can somehow twist to fit their fantasy are included.

 

[uruk]

Shalamar, It's called the "CIT double standard"

It goes: " a wittness is a 100% accurrate except for the parts that we do not agree with."

 

[The Big Dog]

They haven't even published all the interviews that they have. Craig says he interviewed dozens of people. Somehow only ones that they can somehow twist to fit their fantasy are included.

It is worse than that, they have not released the entire videos/recordings of the witnesses upon which they rely.