In light of the fact that it should be painfully clear by now to the members here that not a single first-hand witness account exists to refute the north side approach we should take a closer look at the first-hand accounts that do exist.
Sean Boger is obviously a critical expert witness due to...
911files,
Welcome to the jref forum.
I'm glad you joined because I have questions regarding your research and conclusions.
From what I have read regarding your work and prior statements, you have come to the conclusion that the 2006 released NTSB data and 2007 released 84th RADES data have...
With CIT “to ignore or not to ignore” has been the question. But I’ve just seen some insanity that sharpens the question. Since their flyover witness turned out to be simply toying with the boys, and their miraculous list of 13 NoC witnesses was achieved by including six copies of the same...
For those who haven't been paying attention, the north side approach has been independently validated 13 times over.
CIT found out about many of the the recent north side witnesses from interview transcripts released this year via FOIA from the Center for Military History (CMH).
The employees...
When discussing the witnesses proclaimed by CIT as proving a "NOC" flight path, most people mention the unreliability of memory and the way leading questions could bias memory. Even CIT acknowledges that memory can be inaccurate in the details, as they recently said:
Of course, they don't...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.