• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Heliport tower ATC Sean Boger: ultimate validation of the north side approach

None of the twoofers have done anything to get their "evidence" in a court except a handful like Judy Wood. Are they all faking?
 
Since CIT has been unable to provide any evidence or eyewitnesses of any jet flying over and away from the Pentagon, you may post any verifiable evidence or eyewitnesses to a "flyover" here.
 
The NOC/ONA flight path was first discovered by the Center for Military History in November 2001.
Who made up this insane idea? Who at CIT is this dumb to push this idiotic BS? Lack of evidence dooms delusion.


Dick Eastman corroborated their findings in 2003.
Where is your evidence for this hearsay junk for corroborating a thing that is not true in the first place.


National Geographic corroborated the flight path in 2004.
This is funny, you can’t tell anyone what the data to form the path is from. You failed to prove this due to ignorance of CIT. Or is this your delusion. Fraud, NG does not corroborate your delusion. You failed to provide evidence again. Fraud is CIT


And CIT first corroborated the findings by going to Arlington and recording first-hand accounts in 2006.
CIT failed to do anything but show witnesses pointing to the south path, and their witnesses confirm 77 impacted the Pentagon. CIT confirmed they were the dumbest investigators on 911.


Boger is your best witness as he watched Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

Failure comes to dolt ideas of CIT the Terrorist apologists who fail to figure out 911.

Failure to present what data was used for NG flight path. Failed to present your one and only North Flight path, you have no flight path. No flight path from CIT or p4t. Paiks flight path published by CIT and p4t failed cult members requires 10 Gs and over 80 degrees of bank.
The failed non-paths of NoC, and TLB posts
Boger SAW FLIGHT 77 HIT THE PENTAGON spell doom for dumb ideas inspired by Craig of CIT.
 
Last edited:
Craig is insane.
I don't think he's insane. He's a liar, a megalomaniac, a fraud, a huckster, a profiteer, a snake oil salesman, an idiot, a moron, well the list goes on and on but he's not insane.

Good thing he's no longer a member here or I couldn't say those things, right TLB? :rolleyes:
 
I don't think he's insane. He's a liar, a megalomaniac, a fraud, a huckster, a profiteer, a snake oil salesman, an idiot, a moron, well the list goes on and on but he's not insane.

Good thing he's no longer a member here or I couldn't say those things, right TLB? :rolleyes:

Even if he doesn't believe the fantasy he made up, he is still crazy if you ask me. Mentally stable people don't spend thousands of hours (I would bet he has spent at least a thousand hours doing this) defending ideas they know to be BS. Well, one might do that if there is money involved, but there is no way Craig has made any money off of his crappy DVDs. Mentally stable people also don't make enemies lists with pictures of their detractors when they know their detractors are right.
 
Last edited:
"Insanity" cannot be operationally defined and even if it could be it'd be a waste of time because a label is not an explanation of behavior. In order to understand this kind of bizarre behavior one has to identify the reinforcer. The main reinforcer of his behavior comes from his cyber pals giving him a slap on the ass after he sticks it to those debunkers (normal people). Birds of feather flock together.
 
Last edited:
No sticky no slappy

"Insanity" cannot be operationally defined and even if it could be it'd be a waste of time because a label is not an explanation of behavior. In order to understand this kind of bizarre behavior one has to identify the reinforcer. The main reinforcer of his behavior comes from his cyber pals giving him a slap on the ass after he sticks it to those debunkers (normal people). Birds of feather flock together.
But he has not done that yet,
 
But he has not done that yet,

Oh, I knew that. In their own little world they have, though. Like when WACjobs call screaming and yelling out of the blue then running off a "confrontation". And having their buddies back at the batcave give them a slap on that ass for doing such a "hit piece". Groupthink runs rampant in wooville. That's what I was alluding to in that clause.
 
Uh oh Looks like TLB's been suspended

sockpuppet300x386.jpg


Does Craig Ranke really take these Internet forums so seriously he has to set up different accounts on different computers? Why all the effort for something so stupid?
 
Even if he doesn't believe the fantasy he made up, he is still crazy if you ask me. Mentally stable people don't spend thousands of hours (I would bet he has spent at least a thousand hours doing this) defending ideas they know to be BS. Well, one might do that if there is money involved, but there is no way Craig has made any money off of his crappy DVDs. Mentally stable people also don't make enemies lists with pictures of their detractors when they know their detractors are right.

I don't believe Craig is "mentally unstable", although he may sound that way when he gets all exited about his theories on the radio, etc. Obviously there is some motivation he has for what he does.

Possible Motivations:

Justice - No, his evidence has never seen the light of a court room
Money - If this is his motivation, he's failing miserably
Popularity/Significance - Craig's actions on various message boards certainly seem to point this direction. I think he wants to be who Dylan Avery was in 2006.
 
How many mentally stable people do you know of that make up crazy fantasies they know to be false, and then spend countless hours pathetically defending them just to try to get popular on the Internet?
 
I was just listening to Craig's phone call to Howard Stern's wrap up show. How crazy he sounds aside, I notice that he said he interviewed dozens of witnesses. Really? How many are included in their "evidence"? Could they have left a bunch of them out for some reason?

It is amazing that Craig actually posted that on youtube. Is he delusional enough to think that made him look good?
 
Last edited:
Uh oh Looks like TLB's been suspended

http://www.thriftyfun.com/images/articles11/sockpuppet300x386.jpg

Does Craig Ranke really take these Internet forums so seriously he has to set up different accounts on different computers? Why all the effort for something so stupid?
I believe that TLB was previously suspended for this same reason but let back in
I would think that for a JREF mod to again suspend him for the same reason they must now have found out more info.
Good for them!
I hope that it is revealed that TLB is Craig.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom