Belz...
Fiend God
Historian said:Nobody cares what fabrications that you pull out of thin air.
Ditto.
Historian said:Nobody cares what fabrications that you pull out of thin air.
it sort of looks like a coconut shell in the picture, but coconuts are rare in the himalayas.
We also have hair ,blood and other evidence you can touch .
Ive got 4 large amounts of different hair samples from bigfoots if anyone wants to pay for them to be dna tested let me know .
I will give them up for free just to shut some of you up .
How does man get to be closely related to something which evolved that long before?
Are we descended from bigfoot?
How did bigfoot exist for so long and yet leave no trace?
And, since it has left no trace, on what do you base this claim of 135 million years or existence?
Finally, on what are you basing the claim of the DNA match, since there's been no DNA of bigfoot collected?
So you would not want them tested to confirm/deny "BF", but rather just to shut some of us up?Ive got 4 large amounts of different hair samples from bigfoots if anyone wants to pay for them to be dna tested let me know .
I will give them up for free just to shut some of you up .
Ive got 4 large amounts of different hair samples from bigfoots if anyone wants to pay for them to be dna tested let me know .
I will give them up for free just to shut some of you up .
Why don't you pay for the DNA testing. If the hair turns out to be actual "bigfoot" hair, you'll make many times over what you paid for the testing. Get it done within two years and you can claim the jref million bucks.
So what's stopping you?
Elmer, Continuing with your questions. It would appear that the closer the Bigfoot lives to civilization, then the greater the liklihood that they understand English. They have to be exposed to at least campers and hunters, in order to learn. I have met some that do not have a clue. Some people say that some speak a language that is not English. Some say that they have scribbled in the sand, in Spanish Iberic, which predates the Roman Empire I believe. Bigfoot have families just like us. The kids though, have discipline in their lives, which is almost unheard of in the human world. I doubt that they behave like animals and kick anybody out. There are a lot of single Bigfoot in the forest, however. Just compare the Roe Bigfoot sketch and the Patterson-Gimlin photo, and you can easily see that there are different types. Yeti would also be a different type. I have no idea whether they have multiple births. Bigfoot's most predominant trait, is politeness. For instance, by our standards they have a bad hair day everyday. So they are polite enough that they do not make us look at them on their bad hair days. Yeti are a whole lot different than Bigfoot. Bigfoot are just trying to get along and normally want to be our friends. Yeti tend to be vicious and predatory. Which is why the Australian Government apparently tries to keep their citizens either living in ignorance or in denial.

Ho ho... You might have an easier sell with the leprechauns than you think. Burgstahler thinks they're real:Besides, the leprechauns told me the last bigfoots were wiped out in the fairy war![]()
Kinda changes the humour, doesn't it? Welcome to the board, bencg.I have spoken with Americans who have spent a summer in Ireland, and they assured me that Leprechauns are quite real.
Ho ho... You might have an easier sell with the leprechauns than you think. Burgstahler thinks they're real:
Kinda changes the humour, doesn't it? Welcome to the board, bencg.

As bigfeet become an acknowledged and threatened minority, I suspect they will demand an end to the 'bigfoot' moniker.
Its a bit degrading, really.
Sasquatch is more elegant, and we better get used to it, now that bigfoot has been spotted on mars.
How would you like to be called "bigfoot"?
(besides, new fossil evidence suggests that their feet aren't all that big)
You're very welcome, ben.LOL, yeah and I am still having trouble working out who is serious and who is joshing in this thread;
Thanks for the welcome kitakaze![]()