In all fairness, I don't think anyone apart from Historian is claiming that, and I don't think he's taken seriously by anyone inside or outside the bigfoot community.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Just what the world needs - Another Bigfoot thread
In all fairness, I don't think anyone apart from Historian is claiming that, and I don't think he's taken seriously by anyone inside or outside the bigfoot community.
Locknar
Sum of all evils tm
This is, of course, because he is the only one that can see them...and the only one that can escape the NSA agents and thus able to post all sorts of "valuable"* information"
* NOTE: In this context, "valuable" stands for false, or other wise made up claims/lies
William Parcher
Show me the monkey!
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 27,654
Fairness? You have got to be kidding. Show me your poll. Show me any poll that verifies your ascertation. There are other chat rooms for the people who know about the inter-dimensional nature of the Bigfoot. It is certainly not at JREF because the truth is not what they stand for. Half of the International Bigfoot Society, is of paranormal belief. There are thousands of an older generation, that was alive in the 60' s and 70's, when the inter-dimensional nature of the Bigfoot was COMMON KNOWLEDGE ON THE WEST COAST. Why the west coast? Because that is where many observers for the Lawrence Livermore National Labs, Bigfoot captivity study in the 60's, came from. And when they got home, they naturally could not contain their excitement. So everybody knew. Even my grandmother. So you boys and girls are living in the wrong times and the wrong place, to have received the memo on the subject matter. But that doesn't stop you from claiming that you are "being fair, by smearing me".
Many of the older BFRO people are well aware that Bigfoot are paranormal. I had much of what I have stated here, explained to me by BFRO persons.
So in all fairness, Cuddles appears to have reached a premature conclusion based on a complete lack of adequate preparation and research in regard to the true nature of the Bigfoot people, again.
Did you tell them that you think that you are a BIGSHOT, and that the History Channel would do well to at least read what you have too say, instead of delete it?
Now that the History Channel has moved the Bigfoot shows up to 7 pm, where can they go from here? 24/7 Bigfoot just to irritate people like Spektator? Interview a Bigfoot on the nightly news? Set a Bigfoot up as a nightly news anchor at 6PM? Or they could interview the moronic majority, that does not want to learn about Bigfoot. Now that would be priceless.
kitakaze
Resident DJ/NSA Supermole
When one is considering Burgstahler's claims of Carter this or spirit orb that I find it rather fun to reflect on this post of his in which he explains to us that an art piece by Kainan Jordan is in fact an undebunkable photo of bigfoot:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3268878#post3268878
Posting the above link is in fact, as I have found, a sure-fire way to Neal to ignore you, if anyone is interested...
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3268878#post3268878
Posting the above link is in fact, as I have found, a sure-fire way to Neal to ignore you, if anyone is interested...
LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
Uruk, the BF community does not accept Historian's or Monstro's (or Beckjord's) versions of bigfoot. They pretty much point at them and laugh just like skeptics do.
It's unfair to saddle bigfootery with Historian, imo.
It's unfair to saddle bigfootery with Historian, imo.
Locknar
Sum of all evils tm
Priceless!
Correa Neto
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2003
- Messages
- 8,548
Maybe better say "part of the bigfoot community". Some, from the tone of their posts, are more open to paranormal bigfoot.
Its not unlike UFOlogy, where you have the "esoteric" and the "scientific" branches. I suppose the "esoteric" bigfoot community is smaller than the "scientific", but my sampling may be biased. Not to mention that surely there are "transitional members".
Its not unlike UFOlogy, where you have the "esoteric" and the "scientific" branches. I suppose the "esoteric" bigfoot community is smaller than the "scientific", but my sampling may be biased. Not to mention that surely there are "transitional members".
Last edited:
LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
I've never run across any other footer that comes close to Historian for being off of plumb, though. The fake beliefs, dishonesty, and whackiness are unique in my experience.
aggle-rithm
Ardent Formulist
I won't ask you for evidence, historian. I'm just curious: Why do you believe this? What is your source of information?
It is outlined in The Psychic Sasquatch, I believe. Fossil record of bigfoot sized bare foot footprints, along side dinosaur footprints in stone.
Last edited:
Locknar
Sum of all evils tm
Either it is or it's not; which is it? If you could give a page reference that would be grand.
"BF" sized bare footprints along side dinosaur ones; you'd think that would be pretty heavily covered...almost to the point of common knowledge...in paleontology. Odd I can't find mention of this.
Hopefully though, with your help and page reference you can shed some insight into this claim of yours.
madurobob
Philosopher
Bah - not troo. All of those legacy footers know the truth: that LLNL accidentally created Morgellons disease during their invisibility tests and that this dreadful disease actually creates invisible bigfoot out of otherwise healthy humans. Why do you continue to bury your head in the sand on this?
How can bigfoot both be man's closest relative and 135 million years old?
grayman
Happy-go-lucky Heretic
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2006
- Messages
- 5,655
When you're making the facts up, anything is possible.
AtomicMysteryMonster
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2007
- Messages
- 1,004
Closest relative = closest DNA match to man
135 million years old = Bigfoot was on earth for at least 135 million years vs. modern man's 100,000 tops.
They have nothing to do with each other.
arthwollipot
Limerick Purist Pronouns: He/Him
Oh, you've barely scratched the surface of historian's bigfoot claims. I'd be satisfied if I were you. That way lies madness.