• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
With all your facts and knowledge, it won't take you long to come up with a viable scenario, that gets hijackers from logan, through the steel wall of the South tower, in a tin and plastic commercial plane, will it?
Wow, I just realized what the above implies: bullets, weighing only a few ounces, can't possibly penetrate or shatter hard human bones.

This is outstanding news, since it means bullet-proof vests are no longer required.
 
I don't have any pictures of kitties or puppies, but here's a good picture anyway:

[URL]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_9193465d0b3dd8dfb.jpg[/URL]

Original and explanation here.

I couldn't sleep tonight so I figured reading this thread was not much of a waste of time. Then Mackey posted a beautiful pic and all was not wasted. All of the rest, Malcom, has value only to the extent that it conforms the notion that lunacy is malignant.
 
Did you guys miss NWO Directive X35568-1a3-5?

Just a reminder:

All operatives are reminded that during the hours of 0200 GMT to 1200 GMT playing whack-a-mole with a new twoofer is forbidden if you do not notify Pacifc Rim Neo-Con Central Agent Foolmewunz.

How come the new loons only come out when I'm busy with clients?
 
Dang nabbit, four pages of stupid posted while I sleep and go to work.

Sigh....

Okay who ordered the kittens?




469761052_6f055c51e9.jpg



128241779803750000_79a7a79b-367d-43.jpg
 
I reckon "malcolm kirkman" is none other than, drumroll please ... Dr. David Ray Griffin ... yes it's true we are in the presence of greatness!

David please stop regurgitating the same tired old CT nonsense over and over again it's making you look a little stupid!

:D
 
Well, gee, there wasn't much left of the commercial airliners, either.



I have to say, I do not know how the critical thinkers here do this, day in, day out. But my admiration for you all knows no bounds.

I can't remember who came up with:

The stupid! It burns!


Darth Rotor, I think. :D At any rate, it's too apt.
 
I thought "The Stupid! It BURNS!" was a parody of Gollum's movie yelp about the elf rope. I see Atrios use it all the time.

No matter where it came from, it's very apt.
 
Not as much damage as the wall would do to the car.

...you are aware that when one object impacts another object, there is likely to be damage to BOTH objects, right?

Unless it's my friend Brug's car...we call it the tank. He reversed it full speed into a light pole, and it came out from that with nary a scratch on it. Strange stuff.
 
175 did NOT hit the South tower. A remote controlled flight from Offutt AFB did.
1.
Raytheon, in Aug 2001, flew a passenger jet, take off – flight around – landing. (Der Spiegel).
So?
2.
Raytheon deal in small executive jets, there is no reason for them to fly large passenger planes by remote control.
Um, isn't this the OPPOSITE of what you're arguing?
3.
There is a very good reason for Raytheon not to interest themselves in flying passenger planes by remote control, because it is against the law.
Again, this goes against your theory, does it not?
4.
The law requires that the passengers on any flight, have the flight crew present themselves to the passengers, by standing by the entrance door. This is to reassure the passengers, that the crew are not hung over or worse.

5.
No flight crew by the door = no flight.
What in the hell? What does this have to do with anything? And I don't even think it's true.
6.
Raytheon could have no legitimate reason, for flying a large passenger plane by remote control.
Yeah, you said that already. You shouldn't post while drinking, dude.
7.
Offutt AFB, is a joint civilian/military installation.
8.
Boeing and Raytheon were there.
Hey, so was the Air Force! Maybe they did it!
9.
Boeing has been the subject of RICO law suits for over a decade.
And again, so what?
10.
The military prefer daylight take offs.
So do civilians.
11.
Any commander of an Air Force Base who closed his airport for ‘civilian’ reasons during massive war games, would face disciplinary action.
WTF? Again, what in the devil does this have to do with anything at all?
12.
For the first time in history, a civilian politician was placed in direct command of Norad and other parts of the USAF.
See above.
13.
In order to get a night-time take off from a military airfield, some compelling reason must be given.
I really think you're just making stuff up now. Just because you say it doesn't make it true.
14.
Private civilian executive jets began arriving at dawn on 9/11, because of a celebrity golf tournament that day.
Oh, well, now we know it's an inside job!
15.
Warren Buffet was persuaded out of retirement to host one last celebrity golf tournament.
Golf. Yeah, that's fishy.
16.
Neocons are involved in paedophilia.
People of every political stripe are involved with it. It's a sickness, not a political leaning. Sheesh, you really are a strange one.

17.
Offut AFB is twenty minutes away from Boystown, Omaha.
18.
Boystown is steeped in allegations of paedophilia.
I think you're steeped in something. Forum rules prevent me from saying what that is.
[quote}
19.
Things occurred (criminal convictions) in the Twin Towers apartment block in Omaha, which is midway between the executive jet landing at Offutt and Boystown, ten minutes from either location.
20.
So many planes or non-planes were in the sky that morning, that air traffic controllers didn’t know a real plane from a blip on their screen.
21.
Air traffic controllers deal only with planes that are about to land in their area.
22.
All take offs from Offutt, for both Northern Vigilance, Vigilant warrior and any other reason, would have to be during the night of 9/10 – 9/11.[/quote]
Yeah, things occured in Kansas City, Butte, San Diego, Portland. Hey, I even heard things happened in your house that night, also. Are you in on it, too?
Come back when you actually can post something that's true and makes a lick of sense. We have enough lies and distortions here already, thank you.
 

I have removed some bickering and sniping. Please remember to stay civil in your debates, or further action may follow.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
Precisely my point.
I said they weren't commercial planes. I said they were ex-military. After 15 posts, I'll show you a photo of one.
No need. I've seen them, up close. Actually ridden in a few. Have you even seen an airplane before, outside of photos?
 
I thought "The Stupid! It BURNS!" was a parody of Gollum's movie yelp about the elf rope. I see Atrios use it all the time.

No matter where it came from, it's very apt.


Perhaps it was adapted from "The food ... it burns" which occurs in the 1957 Sci-Fi film "Quatermass 2":

http://www.kamera.co.uk/reviews_extra/the_quatermass_xperiment_and_quatermass_ii.php

"But the most revolting sequence occurs early on when Broadhead
stumbles from the food plant leaving a trail of blood and burning
flesh as he gasps his last - 'The food...it burns'. It's a truly unsettling
scene, and probably harder to watch because of the black and white
photography."
 
What do Boystown have to do with this?
Well, it's obvious! The neocons are pedophiles. Boystown is where the Boys are (hence the name), so the dastardly bastages behind 9/11 were from Boystown!
It' frikken obvious!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom