• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't want to be the person to inform you that you are in the company of pilots and flight instructors.

It won't take you long to cotton on then, will it?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
I'll tell you what. You come up with a credible scenario for hijackers to find their way from Logan to the South tower in 175 and I'll go away, how's that?
Click to expand...

Dude... all they had to do was head in the general direction of New York City and keep an eye out for smoke.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
NY is 200 miles away and covered by clouds.
Click to expand...
planes have this thing called autopilot, you tell it what airport you want to go to (say, for example, JFK in new york) and it flies you there, since the pilot hijackers were instrument rated for large aircraft its a safe bet they knew how to enter a 3-letter airport code and kick back for a while, once near JFK its easy to navigate to the WTC by sight alone

How do two people in an executive jet, remotely controlling/ following the attack plane, suddenly get to thousands?
Click to expand...
so the same two people configured the plane for remote control, replaced f175 with their plane, did away with the passenger, disposed of the real f175 and covered all their tracks...all by themselves?

quite impressive, care to elaborate on how they did all this?

These hijackers of yours, how come half of them are still alive?
Click to expand...
have you spoken to any of them? has anyone spoken to any of them? if so, why isnt it all over the news? or at the very least all over youtube

They certainly didn't step out of 175 andwalk down the stairs.
Click to expand...
no, they crashed planes into WTC1....and WTC2....and the pentagon....and a field in PA....

Your sides can't still be aching, yet the ridicule has still dropped off.
Click to expand...
no, not really, since you are still posting
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Don't you think 175 is enough for the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


It's not merely enough--it's far too much. I must throw in the towel.
The probablity that you will take the following advice is exactly zero, but I would be remiss if I failed to mention Apathoid's invaluable paper explaining why no commercial airliners were flown by remote control on 9/11 (available on 911myths.com, in the section "Investigations, more"). Don't get excited. I promise you, there isn't a soul here who thinks that you would consider reading it.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
I don't want to be the person to inform you that you are in the company of pilots and flight instructors.

It won't take you long to cotton on then, will it?
Click to expand...
How about some first-hand knowledge, bub.

Mr Ignore, meet Malcolm. Malcolm, meet Mr Ignore.

Have a nice life.
 
planes have this thing called autopilot, you tell it what airport you want to go to (say, for example, JFK in new york) and it flies you there, since the pilot hijackers were instrument rated for large aircraft its a safe bet they knew how to enter a 3-letter airport code and kick back for a while, once near JFK its easy to navigate to the WTC by sight alone
Click to expand...

which would entail using that other navigation instrument, the window, and aiming for the tallest building on the horizon in the case of the first plane, and aiming for the large column of smoke in the second case.
 
PhantomWolf said:
I think this is about the only thing you've gotten right so far, but even then it would appear that Flight 175 is still too much for you considering that you're sadly lacking in facts or knowledge.
Click to expand...
With all your facts and knowledge, it won't take you long to come up with a viable scenario, that gets hijackers from logan, through the steel wall of the South tower, in a tin and plastic commercial plane, will it?
Don't rush, it's 5.30 am here, past my bedtime. I didn't expect such a big and may I say, welcoming response.
Take your time with your hijack scenarios. I'll be back tomorrow night to shoot them all down in flames.
Nighty night y'all.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
With all your facts and knowledge, it won't take you long to come up with a viable scenario, that gets hijackers from logan, through the steel wall of the South tower, in a tin and plastic commercial plane, will it?
Don't rush, it's 5.30 am here, past my bedtime. I didn't expect such a big and may I say, welcoming response.
Take your time with your hijack scenarios. I'll be back tomorrow night to shoot them all down in flames.
Nighty night y'all.
Click to expand...

I already did, you ignored it. Just because you don't know how to use a compass, GPS and autopilot doesn't mean that a comercial rated pilot can't. Oh and guess what. All four hijacker pilots had commercial rated licences, imagine that....

As to the plane vs wall. There is this little thing called momentum and another thing called dynamic loading in inelastic collisions. Here's an experiment for you. Get someone to throw a bullet at you. Does it penetrate your skin? Now get them to fire one at you and see if that one bounces off too.
 
pomeroo said:
It's not merely enough--it's far too much. I must throw in the towel.
The probablity that you will take the following advice is exactly zero, but I would be remiss if I failed to mention Apathoid's invaluable paper explaining why no commercial airliners were flown by remote control on 9/11 (available on 911myths.com, in the section "Investigations, more"). Don't get excited. I promise you, there isn't a soul here who thinks that you would consider reading it.
Click to expand...

Precisely my point.
I said they weren't commercial planes. I said they were ex-military. After 15 posts, I'll show you a photo of one.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
With all your facts and knowledge, it won't take you long to come up with a viable scenario, that gets hijackers from logan, through the steel wall of the South tower, in a tin and plastic commercial plane, will it?
Click to expand...

Tin and plastic? First I've heard of that. I guess Boeing would also be surprised to hear such a thing.
Don't rush, it's 5.30 am here, past my bedtime. I didn't expect such a big and may I say, welcoming response.
Take your time with your hijack scenarios. I'll be back tomorrow night to shoot them all down in flames.
Nighty night y'all.
Click to expand...

I find your lack of insight quite staggering. It's 2.30pm here and I won't be surprised if you never come back.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Precisely my point.
I said they weren't commercial planes. I said they were ex-military. After 15 posts, I'll show you a photo of one.
Click to expand...

You never did answer me about if Stanley Praimnath was lying when he saw a big grey plane in United colours and lettering out the window of his office just seconds before it slammed into WTC 2.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Precisely my point.
I said they weren't commercial planes. I said they were ex-military. After 15 posts, I'll show you a photo of one.
Click to expand...
We saw 175 hit live on tv, and hundreds saw it with their eyes. Where were you?

How does it feel to be totally wrong on 9/11?
 
I'm looking forward to seeing the picture of a big military plane which has harder wings than a 767. I guess they build the military version out of stainless steel instead of aluminum.
 
CurtC said:
I'm looking forward to seeing the picture of a big military plane which has harder wings than a 767. I guess they build the military version out of stainless steel instead of aluminum.
Click to expand...

I think you mean tin and plastic.
 
PhantomWolf said:
I already did, you ignored it. Just because you don't know how to use a compass, GPS and autopilot doesn't mean that a comercial rated pilot can't. Oh and guess what. All four hijacker pilots had commercial rated licences, imagine that....

As to the plane vs wall. There is this little thing called momentum and another thing called dynamic loading in inelastic collisions. Here's an experiment for you. Get someone to throw a bullet at you. Does it penetrate your skin? Now get them to fire one at you and see if that one bounces off too.
Click to expand...

Here's a little experiment for you. Drive your car into a corrugated steel wall at 200+ mph and if it goes through the wall, you win the bet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom